Jump to content

Guantanamo Bay files leak: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Handcuffed (talk | contribs)
this is npov and more than well-sourced (imo); since I originally wrote it, I won't revert it again
Line 7: Line 7:


==Source of the leak==
==Source of the leak==
''[[The New York Times]]'' says it received the documents from an anonymous source other than Wikileaks,<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/04/25/wikileaks-gitmo-documents-backstory_n_853126.html|title=WikiLeaks' Guantanamo Bay Documents: The Backstory On News Outlets' Race To Publish Them|date=25 April 2011|accessdate=25 april 2011}}</ref> which they shared with other news outlets such as ''[[The Guardian]]'' and ''[[NPR]]''. Wikileaks, however, noted that "our first partner, ''[[The Daily Telegraph|The Telegraph]]'', published the Gitmo Files 1am GMT, long before NYT or Guardian."<ref>{{cite news|url=https://twitter.com/#!/wikileaks/statuses/62584937680863233|title=Twitter / @WikiLeaks|date=25 April 2011|accessdate=25 April 2011}}</ref> The Guardian reports that "the [[Guantanamo Bay detention camp|Gitmo]] files are the fifth (and very nearly the final) cache of data that disaffected US soldier Bradley Manning is alleged to have turned over to the Wikileaks website more than a year ago." <ref name="guardian_live_25apr">{{cite news|url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/blog/2011/apr/25/guantanamo-bay-files-live-coverage|title=Guantánamo Bay files - live coverage|date=25 April 2011|accessdate=25 April 2011}}</ref> However, before the time of Manning's alleged leak, WikiLeaks was already being reported and rumored to have Gitmo files.<ref>[[Greg Mitchell]] [http://www.thenation.com/blog/160135/wikileaks-news-views-blog-monday-day-149 ''The WikiLeaks Blog: The Guantánamo Files''], at ''The Nation'', April 25, 2011</ref>
''[[The New York Times]]'' says it received the documents from an anonymous source other than Wikileaks,<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/04/25/wikileaks-gitmo-documents-backstory_n_853126.html|title=WikiLeaks' Guantanamo Bay Documents: The Backstory On News Outlets' Race To Publish Them|date=25 April 2011|accessdate=25 april 2011}}</ref> which they shared with other news outlets such as ''[[The Guardian]]'' and ''[[NPR]]''. Wikileaks, however, noted that "our first partner, ''[[The Daily Telegraph|The Telegraph]]'', published the Gitmo Files 1am GMT, long before NYT or Guardian."<ref>{{cite news|url=https://twitter.com/#!/wikileaks/statuses/62584937680863233|title=Twitter / @WikiLeaks|date=25 April 2011|accessdate=25 April 2011}}</ref> The original source of the leak may be [[Bradley Manning]], who is currently detained for allegedly having leaked other material to Wikileaks. The Guardian reports that "the [[Guantanamo Bay detention camp|Gitmo]] files are the fifth (and very nearly the final) cache of data that disaffected US soldier Bradley Manning is alleged to have turned over to the Wikileaks website more than a year ago." <ref name="guardian_live_25apr">{{cite news|url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/blog/2011/apr/25/guantanamo-bay-files-live-coverage|title=Guantánamo Bay files - live coverage|date=25 April 2011|accessdate=25 April 2011}}</ref> However, before the time of Manning's alleged leak, WikiLeaks was already being reported and rumored to have Gitmo files.<ref>[[Greg Mitchell]] [http://www.thenation.com/blog/160135/wikileaks-news-views-blog-monday-day-149 ''The WikiLeaks Blog: The Guantánamo Files''], at ''The Nation'', April 25, 2011</ref>


==Detainees==
==Detainees==

Revision as of 04:37, 26 April 2011

The Guantánamo Bay files leak (also known as The Guantánamo Files)[1] began on 25 April 2011, when WikiLeaks, along with several independent news organizations, began publishing 779 formerly secret documents relating to detainees at the Guantánamo Bay detention camp.[2] The documents consist of classified assessments, interviews, and internal memos, which were written by The Pentagon's Joint Task Force Guantanamo, headquartered at Guantanamo Bay Naval Base. The documents are marked "secret" and "noforn" (information that is not to be shared with representatives of other countries).[3]

The documents reveal that some of its youngest and oldest detainees, which include an 89 year old man and a 14 year old boy, suffered from fragile mental and physical conditions.[vague][4] They also reveal that over 150 innocent Afghans and Pakistanis, including farmers, chefs, and drivers, were held for years without charge.[5][6][7]

Source of the leak

The New York Times says it received the documents from an anonymous source other than Wikileaks,[8] which they shared with other news outlets such as The Guardian and NPR. Wikileaks, however, noted that "our first partner, The Telegraph, published the Gitmo Files 1am GMT, long before NYT or Guardian."[9] The original source of the leak may be Bradley Manning, who is currently detained for allegedly having leaked other material to Wikileaks. The Guardian reports that "the Gitmo files are the fifth (and very nearly the final) cache of data that disaffected US soldier Bradley Manning is alleged to have turned over to the Wikileaks website more than a year ago." [10] However, before the time of Manning's alleged leak, WikiLeaks was already being reported and rumored to have Gitmo files.[11]

Detainees

Al-Jazeera journalist Sami al-Hajj was detained from 2002 to 2008 "to provide information on [...] the al-Jazeera News Network's training program, telecommunications equipment, and newsgathering operations." He was considered to be "a HIGH risk, as he is likely to pose a threat to the US, its interests, and allies." He claims to have been beaten and sexually assaulted.[12]

"Nuclear hellstorm"

Another element from the documents cited Khalid Sheikh Mohammed saying that, if Osama Bin Laden is captured or killed by the Coalition of the Willing, an Al-Qaeda sleeper cell will detonate a "weapon of mass destruction" in a "secret location" in Europe, and promised it would be "a nuclear hellstorm".[13][14][15] This admission might have been extracted from Khalid Sheikh Mohammed after he was waterboarded by the CIA.[16]

Reactions

As for previous releases, Wikileaks stated that at least as important as the content of the published documents is the reaction of each media news outlet; Wikileaks suggested to "compare the first paragraph of these two stories about the same thing" by BBC and CNN.[17] The BBC version opened with the statement:[18]

Wikileaks: Many at Guantanamo 'not dangerous' -- Files obtained by the website Wikileaks have revealed that the US believed many of those held at Guantanamo Bay were innocent or only low-level operatives.

While the CNN version stated:[19]

WikiLeaks reveals details about Guantanamo detainees -- Nearly 800 classified U.S. military documents obtained by WikiLeaks reveal extraordinary details about the alleged terrorist activities of al Qaeda operatives captured and housed at the U.S. Navy's detention facility in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

The US government issued a statement that read: "it is unfortunate that The New York Times and other news organizations have made the decision to publish numerous documents obtained illegally by Wikileaks concerning the Guantanamo detention facility." The documents seem to be "Detainee Assessment Briefs" (DABs) written between 2002 and 2009 and "may or may not represent the current view of a given detainee."[10]

See also

References

  1. ^ http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/apr/25/guantanamo-files-lift-lid-prison
  2. ^ Leigh, David; Ball, James; Burke, Jason (25 April 2011). "Guantánamo files lift lid on world's most controversial prison". The Guardian. UK. Retrieved 25 April 2011.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  3. ^ Temple-Raston, Dina; Gjelton, Tom; Williams, Margot (25 April 2011). "Military Documents Detail Life At Guantanamo". US National Public Radio. USA. Retrieved 25 April 2011.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  4. ^ Ball, James (25 April 2011). "Guantánamo Bay files: Children and senile old men among detainees". The Guardian. UK. Retrieved 25 April 2011.
  5. ^ http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/wikileaks/8471907/WikiLeaks-Guantanamo-Bay-terrorist-secrets-revealed.html
  6. ^ http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/wikileaks-leak-reveals-new-guantanamo-secrets-2274616.html
  7. ^ http://www.democracynow.org/2011/4/25/wikileaks_documents_reveal_us_knowingly_imprisoned
  8. ^ "WikiLeaks' Guantanamo Bay Documents: The Backstory On News Outlets' Race To Publish Them". 25 April 2011. Retrieved 25 april 2011. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  9. ^ "Twitter / @WikiLeaks". 25 April 2011. Retrieved 25 April 2011.
  10. ^ a b "Guantánamo Bay files - live coverage". 25 April 2011. Retrieved 25 April 2011.
  11. ^ Greg Mitchell The WikiLeaks Blog: The Guantánamo Files, at The Nation, April 25, 2011
  12. ^ "Sami Mohy El Din Muhammed Al Hajj". 25 April 2011. Retrieved 25 April 2011.
  13. ^ http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/wikileaks/8471907/WikiLeaks-Guantanamo-Bay-terrorist-secrets-revealed.html - "A senior Al-Qaeda commander claimed that the terrorist group has hidden a nuclear bomb in Europe which will be detonated if Bin-Laden is ever caught or assassinated. The US authorities uncovered numerous attempts by Al-Qaeda to obtain nuclear materials and fear that terrorists have already bought uranium. Sheikh Mohammed told interrogators that Al-Qaeda would unleash a 'nuclear hellstorm'."
  14. ^ http://www.news.com.au/breaking-news/nuclear-hellstorm-if-bin-laden-caught-911-mastermind/story-e6frfku0-1226044724298
  15. ^ http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20110425/wl_mideast_afp/usattacksguantanamowikileakssheikh_20110425184242
  16. ^ http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/20/world/20detain.html
  17. ^ Wikileaks tweet, April 25th, 2011
  18. ^ Wikileaks: Many at Guantanamo 'not dangerous', at BBC.co.uk, 25 April 2011
  19. ^ Lister, Tim WikiLeaks reveals details about Guantanamo detainees, at CNN.com, April 25, 2011