:[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:OpenFuture&diff=427008046&oldid=426960461 Replied] on your talk page. -- [[User:Gogo Dodo|Gogo Dodo]] ([[User talk:Gogo Dodo#top|talk]]) 04:17, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
:[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:OpenFuture&diff=427008046&oldid=426960461 Replied] on your talk page. -- [[User:Gogo Dodo|Gogo Dodo]] ([[User talk:Gogo Dodo#top|talk]]) 04:17, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
: As I said, I was only trying to get to the discussion page for Ideal wealth distribution. I inadvertently thought that the discussion for the deletion reasons were on thetalk page fo rthe article. I did not know that ther was discussion going on on the deletion page. The whole process is a bureaucratic nightmare for a novice and I hav enot gone through it before. So I was simply trying to reinstate that page. Then I discovered I could actually protest the deletion and os I tried that bu that still makes no sense to m since there is still no discussion. However I would like to get back to the discussion I had with opnfuture so I can understand this process a bit better; fo rthe next occasion.
My complaint with openfuture is that he and I were having a discussion adn yet he saw that our discussion was on an irrlevant page that was going to get deleted and woudl not affect any one else's decision. He could have pointed this out o me with a small amount of courtesy, but he gleefully insulted my ability as a psychologist nd ALL psychologists in connection with economics. He seems to be ignorant of the wide spread praise for behavioral economists or behavioral finance researchers such as [[Daniel Kahneman]] ( a psychologist) who won the nobel prize in economics. I would like to have that discussion in case he pursues this issue into other irrelevant areas. In my opinion OpenFuture was nasty in his reckless dismissal of psychologissts. If you look at my user space, you will see that that is all there is on it, and he did look at that and then made some (to my mind) deliberately abusive comments.
Anyway, I do want to get and keep his commentary but I hav e no interest in pursuing the ideal wealth distribution article in the face of such uninformed hostility. So If you can, please delete it but please help me get the commentary back for the record. By the way, someone else joined the discussion there modestly supporting my position, but I cannot remember who - perhaps PAR. None of this showed up ont he crucial deletion page, of course.... Thanks. [[User:Imersion|Imersion]] ([[User talk:Imersion|talk]]) 00:42, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
== Thank you ==
== Thank you ==
Revision as of 00:42, 3 May 2011
Welcome to my talk page! I will reply on your talk page unless you prefer otherwise as usually noted on your talk page. If you are an editor without an account, I will reply here.
When leaving messages, please keep these tips in mind:
Use a descriptive subject/headline.
If you are asking a question about an article, please tell me which article you are referring to.
Please do not add your message to another editor's conversation unless you are commenting on the same topic. Start a new section, unless...
If you are continuing a conversation with me, please edit the relevant section instead of starting a new section.
As I said, I was only trying to get to the discussion page for Ideal wealth distribution. I inadvertently thought that the discussion for the deletion reasons were on thetalk page fo rthe article. I did not know that ther was discussion going on on the deletion page. The whole process is a bureaucratic nightmare for a novice and I hav enot gone through it before. So I was simply trying to reinstate that page. Then I discovered I could actually protest the deletion and os I tried that bu that still makes no sense to m since there is still no discussion. However I would like to get back to the discussion I had with opnfuture so I can understand this process a bit better; fo rthe next occasion.
My complaint with openfuture is that he and I were having a discussion adn yet he saw that our discussion was on an irrlevant page that was going to get deleted and woudl not affect any one else's decision. He could have pointed this out o me with a small amount of courtesy, but he gleefully insulted my ability as a psychologist nd ALL psychologists in connection with economics. He seems to be ignorant of the wide spread praise for behavioral economists or behavioral finance researchers such as Daniel Kahneman ( a psychologist) who won the nobel prize in economics. I would like to have that discussion in case he pursues this issue into other irrelevant areas. In my opinion OpenFuture was nasty in his reckless dismissal of psychologissts. If you look at my user space, you will see that that is all there is on it, and he did look at that and then made some (to my mind) deliberately abusive comments.
Anyway, I do want to get and keep his commentary but I hav e no interest in pursuing the ideal wealth distribution article in the face of such uninformed hostility. So If you can, please delete it but please help me get the commentary back for the record. By the way, someone else joined the discussion there modestly supporting my position, but I cannot remember who - perhaps PAR. None of this showed up ont he crucial deletion page, of course.... Thanks. Imersion (talk) 00:42, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you
Thank you for the help, I really appreciate your efforts, and actually the countless reverts really started getting on my nerves. I'll let you know. Shahid • Talk2me20:41, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
