Jump to content

User talk:NSLE: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 90: Line 90:


--<small>[[User:Cool Cat|Cool Cat]]<sup>[[User talk:Cool Cat|Talk]]|[[Special:Emailuser/Cool Cat|@]]</sup></small> 21:27, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
--<small>[[User:Cool Cat|Cool Cat]]<sup>[[User talk:Cool Cat|Talk]]|[[Special:Emailuser/Cool Cat|@]]</sup></small> 21:27, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

== [[Zakir Naik]] ==

NSLE, I just went over 3RR. I lost count. You're an admin active right now, so I'm reporting for the tongue-lashing or the block or whatever.

We have a brand-new user named RedCrescent who believes that he has a direct line to Allah. He is editing the Zakir Naik article to say that Zakir Naik's beliefs are not orthodox and are contrary to the Qur'an and Sunnah. I keep pointing out that WP cannot make religious judgments and he keeps coming up with new ways to say that Zakir Naik's beliefs are WRONG.

Punish me if you must, but please throw in a few reverts at Zakir Naik. [[User:Zora|Zora]] 07:38, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:38, 28 March 2006

Leave me a new message

See also: Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9

All discussions are archived monthly or when talk page exceeds 50 headers, or when I feel like it, except for ongoing discussions. Ongoing discussions will be archived at the next archive date. I'm reserving the right to refuse to respond to any comments or remove any messages if need be. NSLE (T+C+CVU) 05:02, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hi NSLE, and thank you for taking time to vote on my RfA. I understand that my last 6000+ edits were not sufficient to convince you that edits like some of my early ones would never be repeated again, but I sincerely hope that at some point I would be able to convince you of my transformation. Looking forward to working with you in future. Regards, deeptrivia (talk) 03:23, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Hey NSLE, I prepared my questions in advance, including yours. Would you like to see them? --Khoikhoi 04:41, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

My RfA recently closed and it was a success, passing at 84-02-00. I would like to thank you for your support. Normally I would extend a hand in regards to any help I could offer, but seeing as your an admin as well, any help from me would probably be minimal. Nonetheless, if something does come up and you would like another opinion, please by all means, grab a Pepsi and stop by my talk page. Thanks again. Pepsidrinka 17:54, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Esperanza Newsletter, Issue #1

Reach out is a program aimed at allowing users to bring issues that they have had in Wikipedia to a listening, sympathetic and caring audience:
"No one can know how we feel if we do not say. We cannot expect to get understanding if we do not ask for it. No one will dispute that sometimes life's issues are too much for one person. It is fair to say that sometimes Wikipedia's problems fall under the same heading. This is a place where you can bring the bruises that can sometimes be got on this project for attention."
The Stress alerts program aims at identifying users who are stressed, alerting the community of thier stress and works in tandem with the Stressbusters at trying to identify causes of stress and eliminating them.
Note from the editor
Welcome to this new format of the Esperanza Newsletter, which came about during the last Advisory Council meeting - we hope you like it! The major changes are that each month, right after the Council meeting, this will be sent out and will include two featured programs and a sum up of the meeting. Also, it will be signed by all of the Advisory Council members, not just Celestianpower. Have an Esperanzial end of March, everyone!
  1. Future meetings are to be held monthly, not fortnightly as before.
  2. Bans and Access level changes (apart from autovoice) in the IRC channel are to be reported at the new log.
  3. In the IRC channel, there is going to be only one bot at a time.
  4. The charter requires members to have 150 edits and 2 weeks editing. Why this is the case will be clarified.
  5. A new Code of Conduct will be drafted by JoanneB and proposed to the Esperanza community.
  6. The NPA reform idea is to be dropped officially.
  7. Charter ammendments are to be discussed in future, not voted on.
  8. The Advisory Council is not going to be proposed to be expanded by the Advisory Council themselves, if others want to propose it, they will listen.
Signed...

Re: RfB

Thanks for letting me know; I'll take a look at it now. Thanks! Flcelloguy (A note?) 01:24, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've answered your question now. Please don't hesitate to ask for clarification or ask any more questions. Thanks! Flcelloguy (A note?) 01:50, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about the stress

I'm sorry to hear you're stressed out...don't let the trolls get to you. Here's a self-hypnosis thing to try (it works for me):

Close your eyes for 10 seconds. Picture your mind in a dark, quiet space. Each time you breathe in, it cools, and becomes calm. You are in control of the state of your mind.

I hope it helps....good luck ;)--The ikiroid (talk/parler/hablar/paroli/说/話) 01:27, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Don't feed the trolls. Don't let them get to you, either! -- Natalya 17:11, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi & Splash

Hi NSLE, could you tell me what comments in particular of Splash's you are referring to with this edit? Cheers, Talrias (t | e | c) 07:03, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for reverting vandalism on my user page. Apparently I'm an "idiot admin bastard." I don't know which of the three insults is the worst. ;) --TantalumTelluride 07:13, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Trolls

Hey there, I see your hands are full due to trolls. Well so are mine. So I suggest we cooperate in dealing with them which would benefict us both. I for one am overwhelmed with the number of trolls I deal with to the point of loosing my objectivity. I believe you may be suffering from the same problem.

Here is what I propose. I'll collect evidence against people pestering you and you do te same for me.

Since I have no idea who you are, I do not believe there is a conflict of interest.

--Cool CatTalk|@ 21:27, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NSLE, I just went over 3RR. I lost count. You're an admin active right now, so I'm reporting for the tongue-lashing or the block or whatever.

We have a brand-new user named RedCrescent who believes that he has a direct line to Allah. He is editing the Zakir Naik article to say that Zakir Naik's beliefs are not orthodox and are contrary to the Qur'an and Sunnah. I keep pointing out that WP cannot make religious judgments and he keeps coming up with new ways to say that Zakir Naik's beliefs are WRONG.

Punish me if you must, but please throw in a few reverts at Zakir Naik. Zora 07:38, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]