User talk:AmandaNP

Nominate someone to receive a DeltaQuad Award today!

Archives (Index)

2009/December 2010/January 2010/February 2010/March 2010/April 2010/May 2010/June 2010/July 2010/August 2010/September 2010/October 2010/November 2010/December 2011/January 2011/February 2011/March 2011/April 2011/May 2011/June 2011/July 2011/August 2011/September 2011/October 2011/November 2011/December 2012/January 2012/February 2012/March ISI 2012/April 2012/May 2012/June 2012/September 2012/August 2012/July 2012/October 2012/December 2012/November 2013/January 2013/March 2013/February 2013/April 2013/May 2013/June 2013/July 2013/August 2013/September 2013/October 2013/November 2013/December 2014/January 2014/Early 2014 2014/July 2014/August 2014/September 2014/October 2014/December 2014/November 2015/March-July 2015/January 2015/February 2015/August-November 2015/December 2016/January-February 2016/March-May 2016/June 2016/June-October 2016/November-December 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Autopatrolled status

User:DeltaQuad/talkdone I noticed you didn't get that readded when you resigned your bit -- you should probably ask for it. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 20:38, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

Ahh yes, because of my SPI tagging. Thanks for the notice :) -- DQ (t) (e) 21:03, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

Yep, that was where I spotted it. :-) --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 21:15, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

Concerning the Arbitration Committee Elections

User:DeltaQuad/talkdone DeltaQuad,

As a candidate for the Arbitration Committee elections, please be aware that your name has been entered into the SecurePoll ballot and can no longer be removed barring the most dire of emergencies and direct manipulation of the database. While you may still withdraw from the election, your name will not be removed from the ballot, but only struck through. If you have any further questions on the process, feel free to contact myself, the other election administrators, or the election coordinators. --Tznkai (talk), 2011 Arbitration Committee Election Administrator. 21:18, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

Unanswered question

User:DeltaQuad/talkdone Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2011/Candidates/DeltaQuad – I've noticed that you haven't answered this question yet. That page is transcluded on Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2011/Candidates/Discussion, so it's highly visible to any voter who navigates there via the links on the Special:SecurePoll page. If you don't want to respond, then you're free to do so. I'm letting you know since the voting has begun. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 02:39, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Darn I didn`t see that, thanks for the heads up. -- DQ (t) (e) 02:43, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

You're welcome. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 03:00, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Taking a break

User:DeltaQuad/talkdone Hi DQ. I'm not being picky (really), but perhaps you'd like to consider removing the icons and UBX from your up & tp while you are taking a break just to avoid any confusion. Take care :) Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:41, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Made this edit, but i'm not sure what your referring to for my talkpage, I don't see anything but the large notice at the top saying i'm not. -- DQ (t) (e) 05:20, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Ratel

User:DeltaQuad/talkdone I noticed this edit of yours. What checkuser is currently looking at this? The case seems to have come to a dead stall.—Kww(talk) 02:55, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

As I said, it was only a procedural noting of the above note by Chase me ("I'm looking into this at the moment. The Cavalry (Message me) 5:29 pm, 22 November 2011, last Tuesday (6 days ago) (UTC−5)"). I could have taken it wrong though, but it sounded to me Like Chase me was looking into it. But i'll see if it's actually being looked into tomorrow. -- DQ (t) (e) 06:34, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 November 2011

• News and notes: Arb's resignation sparks lightning RfC, Fundraiser 2011 off to a strong start, GLAM in Qatar

• In the news: The closed, unfriendly world of Wikipedia, fundraiser fun and games, and chemists vs pornstars

• Recent research: Quantifying quality collaboration patterns, systemic bias, POV pushing, the impact of news events, and editors' reputation

• WikiProject report: The Signpost scoops The Bugle

• Featured content: The best of the week

• Arbitration report: Voting underway in the elections, finally a final decision on Abortion, scant movement on requests

• Technology report: Foundation appears correct to back improved smartphone support; and how a Reddit slip meant no-one could read anything for thirty minutes

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 06:31, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

Email from ClaudioSantos

Hello, AmandaNP. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

-- ClaudioSantos¿? 18:08, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

 Replied -- DQ (t) (e) 00:32, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

Re-Replied too.I sent you a new message. Please, check your email box again. -- ClaudioSantos¿? 03:05, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

 Working but it's gonna take me a bit to look into it. -- DQ (t) (e) 19:43, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Unblock-en-l Statistics.pdf missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Unblock-en-l Statistics.pdf is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:10, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

I welcome thee

• Here, take the mop and bucket... let's get back to work. --Dave ^{♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫®} 06:13, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

  Already on it :) -- DQ (t) (e) 18:05, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the good work!

	The Bronze Wiki Award
	Thanks for all your help reviewing unblock requests on unblock-en-l during November! By my count, you were third in the number of responses sent during this month, so you have earned the Bronze Wiki Award! Congratulations! Hersfold (t/a/c) 04:00, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

Really? Wow. Can you pass on those statistics so I can make up an official report like last time? -- DQ (t) (e) 04:36, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

block evasion at Range Resources

Our corporate whitewasher has come back...maybe semi-protection would be needed if the PR team returns. elle _{vécut heureuse} ^{à jamais} (be free) 04:22, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

I got an email from them too. Filed an SPI requesting CU, and depending on the positive result or not I'll look at semi-ing. But thanks for the follow up. -- DQ (t) (e) 04:35, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

Btw, can we have a look at User:WikiLoverr? (The name seems chosen to avoid suspicion). Based on the the user's edits to the Gasland article I can't help but wonder. elle _{vécut heureuse} ^{à jamais} (be free) 04:43, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

I don't want us to be too harsh either. Certainly I'd like executives / PR teams to contribute to a good, balanced article, and I do see that the newest editor left a lot of the critical content intact. elle _{vécut heureuse} ^{à jamais} (be free) 04:48, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

I would too, no doubt, and I don't wanna be harsh, but we can't keep coming back to new accounts every time. That's why I didn't block the master the first time around. As for him, I don't think he is related, but he'll probably come up in a sleeper check if he is, which I have requested. -- DQ (t) (e) 05:43, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

109.127.86.52

Re. 109.127.86.52 (talk · contribs) block [1] "mistake, not a proxy" & WPOP arch

Can you just clarify to me what happened, with that one? 'Coz on that last page (the WPOP), it's not very clear how that was closed.

Only reason I'm asking is, this (which is re. BRFA/SharedIPArchiveBot 2.  Chzz  ►  12:58, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

As far as I remember it, at the time it was not a proxy, it was only the software I was accidentally using at the time that made it look like it was. I have not rechecked it since. -- DQ (t) (e) 16:47, 1 December 2011 (UTC)