User talk:Buster7: Difference between revisions
→test: 7 billion views per month |
Will Beback (talk | contribs) →Ask Jimbo: new section |
||
Line 114: | Line 114: | ||
{{wb|GoingBatty|Congratulations}} [[User:GoingBatty|GoingBatty]] ([[User talk:GoingBatty|talk]]) 17:15, 6 February 2012 (UTC) |
{{wb|GoingBatty|Congratulations}} [[User:GoingBatty|GoingBatty]] ([[User talk:GoingBatty|talk]]) 17:15, 6 February 2012 (UTC) |
||
== Ask Jimbo == |
|||
Thanks for your note. Since no policy other decisions are determined at user talk pages (except for unblock issues), I don't see how the prohibition on [[WP:CANVASS|canvassing]] would apply. <b>[[User:Will Beback|<font color="#595454">Will Beback</font>]] [[User talk:Will Beback|<font color="#C0C0C0">talk</font>]] </b> 04:06, 7 February 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:06, 7 February 2012
![]() | This user gives a helping hand to new editors at the Feedback Dashboard. |
![]() | An editor thinks something might be wrong with this page. They can't be bothered to fix it, but can rest assured that they've done their encyclopedic duty by sticking on a tag. Please allow this tag to languish indefinitely at the top of the page, since nobody knows exactly what the tagging editor was worked up about. |
Template:Multicol
2008 |
This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/23/Nice_biscuit.jpg/175px-Nice_biscuit.jpg)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/ea/Defend_equality_poster_cropped.png/175px-Defend_equality_poster_cropped.png)
Quote
This project does not exist to help editors grow a thicker skin. Our mission is to build an encyclopedia, not establish limits for low-level abuse that we think our volunteer editors should be willing to suffer. If we drive away more people than we attract, then it's a genuine loss to the project and we should fix it rather than label those who would prefer to work in a civil environment as "thin skinned." -- User:Cool Hand Luke [2]
"First they came…"
is a famous statement attributed to Pastor Martin Niemöller (1892–1984) about the inactivity of German intellectuals following the Nazi rise to power and the purging of their chosen targets, group after group. The text of the quotation is usually presented roughly as follows:
First they came for the communists,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a communist.
Then they came for the trade unionists,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a trade unionist.
Then they came for the Jews,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a Jew.
Then they came for me
and there was no one left to speak out for me.
test
w~), E~), :~0, ;~), I~), C~), S~), 8~), {~), {;~), x:~), {:~)x, §:~)
- Many an edit war (or talk discssion) may seem like a fight over nothing to the casual observer, but considering that according to its staff, the popular, multilingual Web site Wikipedia gets about 7 billion views per month, stakes can be high. An edit yields what millions of people read on the site on any particular topic.
wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Flemish_people
The Signpost: 23 January 2012
- News and notes: SOPA blackout, Orange partnership
- WikiProject report: The Golden Horseshoe: WikiProject Toronto
- Featured content: Interview with Muhammad Mahdi Karim and the best of the week
- Arbitration report: Four open cases, proposed decision in Muhammad images, AUSC call for applications
- Technology report: Looking ahead to MediaWiki 1.19 and related issues
The Signpost: 30 January 2012
- In the news: Zambian wiki-assassins, Foundation über alles, editor engagement and the innovation plateau
- Recent research: Language analyses examine power structure and political slant; Wikipedia compared to commercial databases
- WikiProject report: Digging Up WikiProject Palaeontology
- Featured content: Featured content soaring this week
- Arbitration report: Five open cases, voting on proposed decisions in two cases
- Technology report: Why "Lua" is on everybody's lips, and when to expect MediaWiki 1.19
Newtatis newtandum
Greetings good Sir! Fortunately many people now know (1) they can't trust anything they read on WPedia, and also (2) unless they're utter fools they must corroborate/cross-check whatever "information" they find here - particularly where political articles are concerned. (Several professor friends warn their students that WP articles should be regarded with circumspection, and the political articles extremely so; and one I know has already regaled her students with the fact that the Newt articles are now edited by proxies for Newt's campaign manager (without this breaking any rules! How cute is that!). There is already a small notice on the Newt talk page, which just might act as a caveat for anyone who troubles to read it, so I guess that'll have to do? As for anyone who reads the article but doesn't go to - or even know about - the talk page, well, they'll never know that Newt's campaign manager is editing it by proxy. (Unless it's brought to wider attention off-wiki.) So tough tits for them! Readers? Schmeaders! Writegeist (talk) 04:16, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
- I don't know for sure but I guess that Jimbo depends on the ability of fellow editors to keep political articles fair and un-biased. Thats asking alot from amateur un-paid oppressed volunteers. At important articles there will always definitley be the core of opposing viewpoint or 'other Party' editors that will keep the train on track. But propoganda can be subtle and gradual with only a hint of its dishonesty. Paid operatives get paid to do a job. Wikipedia is the Worlds first choice for information gathering on every topic. What pays the mortgage, the tuition, the car payment, etc. Observance of WP rules? Or proving you can slip under the fence and get the job of directing communications done? Talk about poisoning the well. I'm not paid to be a watchdog, guarding the merchandise. So...the new rules are...just be upfront and open about who you are. "I'm a Martian. I'm paid to make sure that the Mars article always and forever will show Mars to be a wonderful place. I can't edit myself but I can get other people from other planets to edit for me. Its like they are my assistants but I dont have to pay them. Isn't Earth a wonderful place. Someone should write an article about it. Maybe when I'm off the clock. Nah! To busy looking for a new client."```Buster Seven Talk 07:08, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
lol
you are truly one of the most wonderful people I have ever met online. Please don't ever lose touch with me: Anonomous User
- TY. Back at you. Whatever is going on will abate with time. I surmise you have run across abrasiveness and mis-understanding. If you go, they win! If you stay, your fellow editors win; one of their champions has decided to stay "on the pitch". What I said in my edit summary is very true...get some rest, have a hardy meal, do something fun w/ a friend and life goes on. You got mixed up in a dog fight and got bit and scratched. What did you expect? Life lesson #32...Never extend your hand to a pit bull. He may bite it off. ```Buster Seven Talk
Lewis Thomas 1973
- "We need to preserve the absolute unpredictability and total unprobability of our connected minds.....We are all obsessed with the need to feed informtion in, as fast as we can, but we lack sensing mechanisms to get anything back."
- "....a system with multiple agents, dynamically interacting in multiple ways, following local rules and oblivious to any higher-level instructions."```Buster Seven Talk
Reply
Hello. You have a new message at GoingBatty's talk page. GoingBatty (talk) 17:15, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Ask Jimbo
Thanks for your note. Since no policy other decisions are determined at user talk pages (except for unblock issues), I don't see how the prohibition on canvassing would apply. Will Beback talk 04:06, 7 February 2012 (UTC)