User talk:RobertMfromLI

My first Editor Review: User:RobertMfromLI/EditorReviews

Welcome to my talk page

I prefer to keep conversations in one place in order to make it easier to follow them. Therefore, if I have begun a conversation with you elsewhere, that is where I would prefer you reply and is probably where I will reply to you.

If you are a (talk page stalker), you are welcome here, and any help you give is greatly appreciated.

If you think I've done something wrong (marked your edit as vandalism?) please check your talk page for an explanation first. If you still don't understand why, then please click here to leave me a message - it is possible I've made a mistake, and will freely admit it.

Currently I am seeking adoptees to mentor. If you're a new or relatively new user and need a hand learning about Wikipedia, drop me a message on my talk page. If you want to know what one of my previous adoptees thought of the experience, check out this page (read the "Wikipedia and Me" section and"Ratings" section).

Threads older than 15 days are archived automatically by MiszaBot

Hello, RobertMfromLI. You have new messages at Ramos1990's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Ramos1990 (talk) 01:47, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

Talkbacks

Hello, RobertMfromLI. You have new messages at Cahuber's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Talkback

Hello, RobertMfromLI. You have new messages at Cahuber's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

TB

Hello, RobertMfromLI. You have new messages at Atomician's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Muhammad images Arbitration request

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests#Muhammad Images and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—

• Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests#Requests for Arbitration;
• Wikipedia:Arbitration guide.

Thanks, -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 13:53, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

Muhammad images arbitration case

An arbitration case involving you has been opened, and is located at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Muhammad images. Evidence that you wish the Arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence sub-page, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Muhammad images/Evidence. Please add your evidence by January 11, 2011, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can contribute to the case workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Muhammad images/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Alexandr Dmitri (talk) 14:50, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Happy holidays

		Happy holidays.
		Best wishes for joy and happiness. Hope you have a great one! Jonayo! Selena 4 ever 00:06, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Adoptee

I need to be adopted! Could you help or suggest a mentor? Thanks!Donnabalancia (talk) 18:34, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Adopt me!

I'm new this, but i think i can learn fast. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Veritas77777 (talk • contribs) 21:10, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Muhammad images closed

An arbitration case regarding Muhammad images has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:

1. The community is asked to hold a discussion that will establish a definitive consensus on what images will be included in the article Muhammad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views), and on where the images will be placed within the article. As with all decisions about content, the policies on verifiability and the neutral point of view must be the most important considerations. The editors who choose to participate in this discussion are asked to form an opinion with an open mind, and to explain their decision clearly. Any editor who disrupts this discussion may be banned from the affected pages by any uninvolved administrator, under the discretionary sanctions authorised in this decision. The decision reached in this discussion will be appended to this case within two months from the close of the case.
2. Ludwigs2 is prohibited from contributing to any discussion concerning Muhammad.
3. Ludwigs2 is banned from the English Wikipedia for one year.
4. Tarc is admonished to behave with appropriate professionalism in his contributions to discussions about disputed article content.
5. FormerIP is admonished to behave with appropriate professionalism in his contributions to discussions about disputed article content.
6. Hans Adler is reminded to engage in discussions about disputed article content with an appropriate degree of civility.
7. Standard discretionary sanctions are authorised for all pages relating to Muhammad, broadly interpreted.
8. The participants in the dispute about depictions of Muhammad are reminded that editors who engage extensively in an intractable dispute can become frustrated, and that it is important to be aware that as editors we are limited in our ability to contribute constructively to a deadlocked disagreement. Our exasperation with a dispute can make us unprofessional or unreceptive to compromise. We therefore encourage the disputants of this case to consider if their participation in the coming community discussion of depictions of Muhammad would be useful, and we remind them that if they disrupt the community discussion they may be banned from the discussion or otherwise sanctioned under the discretionary sanctions provision of this case.

Mlpearc (powwow) 16:17, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

For the Arbitration Committee

You have a user that needs help!

Thanks! NCISfan2 (talk) 20:44, 8 March 2012 (UTC)