User talk:OsamaK: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
ClueBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:OsamaK/February 2012. (BOT) |
Jimbo Wales (talk | contribs) →Alexa Bot: new section |
||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
<!--:<h1 style="border: none; font-variant: small-caps; font-weight: bold; line-height: 1.2; text-align: center;">Don't tell me that sources are not required for [[WP:PD|PDs]]. We do have [[WP:CITE#IMAGE|clear policies]]!</h1>--> |
<!--:<h1 style="border: none; font-variant: small-caps; font-weight: bold; line-height: 1.2; text-align: center;">Don't tell me that sources are not required for [[WP:PD|PDs]]. We do have [[WP:CITE#IMAGE|clear policies]]!</h1>--> |
||
== Alexa Bot == |
|||
Hi Osama! Long time, no chat! |
|||
I'm curious as to what you might think about generally replacing alexa statistics throughout English Wikipedia with quantcast numbers. In the industry, Quantcast numbers are considered to be much more accurate, and Alexa numbers to be highly questionable. At the very least, I wonder what the possibility might be of updating these numbers in infoboxes to include both, rather than Alexa alone.--[[User:Jimbo Wales|Jimbo Wales]] ([[User talk:Jimbo Wales|talk]]) 11:35, 2 April 2012 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 11:35, 2 April 2012
Index
| ||
|
||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III. |
Alexa Bot
Hi Osama! Long time, no chat!
I'm curious as to what you might think about generally replacing alexa statistics throughout English Wikipedia with quantcast numbers. In the industry, Quantcast numbers are considered to be much more accurate, and Alexa numbers to be highly questionable. At the very least, I wonder what the possibility might be of updating these numbers in infoboxes to include both, rather than Alexa alone.--Jimbo Wales (talk) 11:35, 2 April 2012 (UTC)