User talk:4bpp: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
You may also drop your valuable suggestions on other related articles on my talk page. [[Image:Teeth.png]]<br /> |
You may also drop your valuable suggestions on other related articles on my talk page. [[Image:Teeth.png]]<br /> |
||
[[User:Jobin RV|Jobin]] ([[User talk:Jobin RV|talk]]) 14:46, 28 September 2011 (UTC) |
[[User:Jobin RV|Jobin]] ([[User talk:Jobin RV|talk]]) 14:46, 28 September 2011 (UTC) |
||
== Unblock request== |
|||
{{unblock|I am affected by a range block on 213.239.192.0/18, justified by "it being believed to be an open proxy". In fact, it belongs to a legitimate German server hoster, Hetzner Online AG, and for various reasons I tunnel my entire internet traffic through my hired server machine, which is hosted with them. Since IPs within the block are handed out on a static basis, blocking the entire range does not seem reasonable to me.}} |
Revision as of 20:10, 5 April 2012
Hello!!!
Hi, this is Jobin, a new wikipedia user. I came to understand that you have an interest in Computer and related topics. I am working on a few articles related to Programming in C. Therefore, I kindly request you to help me on these topics
You may also drop your valuable suggestions on other related articles on my talk page.
Jobin (talk) 14:46, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
Unblock request
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f6/Appointment_blue.svg/48px-Appointment_blue.svg.png)
4bpp (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I am affected by a range block on 213.239.192.0/18, justified by "it being believed to be an open proxy". In fact, it belongs to a legitimate German server hoster, Hetzner Online AG, and for various reasons I tunnel my entire internet traffic through my hired server machine, which is hosted with them. Since IPs within the block are handed out on a static basis, blocking the entire range does not seem reasonable to me. |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=I am affected by a range block on 213.239.192.0/18, justified by "it being believed to be an open proxy". In fact, it belongs to a legitimate German server hoster, Hetzner Online AG, and for various reasons I tunnel my entire internet traffic through my hired server machine, which is hosted with them. Since IPs within the block are handed out on a static basis, blocking the entire range does not seem reasonable to me. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=I am affected by a range block on 213.239.192.0/18, justified by "it being believed to be an open proxy". In fact, it belongs to a legitimate German server hoster, Hetzner Online AG, and for various reasons I tunnel my entire internet traffic through my hired server machine, which is hosted with them. Since IPs within the block are handed out on a static basis, blocking the entire range does not seem reasonable to me. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}