User talk:Sgt. R.K. Blue

Closing RFCs

When you closed the username RFC on Tourism Team (talk · contribs), you forgot to add the {{subst:rfcn bottom}} at the bottom of the section. I've taken care of it, this is just in case you dind't know to add it. If it was just a slip, ignore me. --GraemeL ^(talk) 15:06, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

It was just a slip. Thanks for fixing it. --Sgt. R.K. Blue (talk) 17:34, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

AFD

A discussion on possible deletion of the Francesco Schettino biographical article (currently a redirect to the article on the disaster) is underway at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francesco Schettino. I see you've participated in discussions on this topic in the past and thought you might like to share your thoughts as well.--RadioFan (talk) 19:22, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

WP Connecticut in the Signpost

The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Connecticut for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. -Mabeenot (talk) 03:13, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Congrats

		The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
		For expert service in signature digitization. Cheers! —Eustress talk 14:25, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Thank you! —Sgt. R.K. Blue (talk) 09:02, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Dispute resolution survey

Dispute Resolution – Survey Invite Hello Sgt. R.K. Blue. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Wikipedia, in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your experience. The survey takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released. Please click HERE to participate. Many thanks in advance for your comments and thoughts. You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated research page. Steven Zhang DR goes to Wikimania! 02:31, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Your post at Template talk:Episode list

It seems that the problem you identified at Template talk:Episode list#Edit request on 8 April 2012 was created by people screwing around with the template to compensate for poor editing practices. ie including fields that need headings without including column headings for those fields. This (other blank parameters) appears to be the sort of thing that was causing the problem. --AussieLegend (talk) 11:32, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the information. People should be more careful. —Sgt. R.K. Blue (talk) 11:02, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

You're invited! New England Wikimedia General Meeting

	New England Wikimedia General Meeting
	The New England Wikimedia General Meeting will be a large-scale meetup of all Wikimedians (and friends) from the New England area in order to discuss regional coordination and possible formalization of our community (i.e., a chapter). Come hang out with other Wikimedians, learn more about ongoing activities, and help plan for the future! Potential topics: What is a Wikimedia chapter and should we work towards one? Planning of regular Boston meetups (any other New England cities?) Planning for upcoming coordinated events (Wikipedia Love Libraries, Wiki Loves Monuments, Wiknic, etc.) Outreach to universities (WikiProject Academical Village) and cultural institutions (GLAM) Wikimania DC is this summer. Your ideas!
	Sunday, April 22 1:30 PM – 4:30 PM	Conference Room C06, Johnson Building, Boston Public Library—Central Library 700 Boylston St., Boston MA 02116
Please sign up here: Wikipedia:Meetup/New England!

---

Message delivered by Dominic at 08:56, 11 April 2012 (UTC). Note: You can remove your name from this meetup invite list here.

I made a bit of a mess

Trying to be helpfull I actually made a mess with CountMaculas comments on Talk:Republican Party presidential primaries, 2012#Merge proposed, and I am now trying to undo it. That mean his comment is gone from the talkpage. (originally he made it and then undid it, indicating in history that he wanted to move it. So when he didnt I thought he had technical problems - I was wrong). You made a comment to the general dicussion after his comment. I have of course not removed it, but you might want to check if it is still logical and nice with his comment gone. I know this is not regulare procedure on talkpages and I am sorry I messed up, but I hope for your understanding and patience. You can see the whole conversation on his talkpage: User talk:CountMacula#Problems with the talkpage on Republican primaries? and on my talkpage: User talk:Jack Bornholm#Please undo your undo of my undo Jack Bornholm (talk) 13:40, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Mine was more of a general comment and not a response to what CountMacula had written. I'm fine with how things appear at Talk:Republican Party presidential primaries, 2012#Merge proposed. If anything, my post more related to GoldRingChip's mentioning of adding the word "presidential" in the article title of Massachusetts Republican presidential primary, 2012 than anything else. My thoughts to add the word "presidential" to all state primary articles is probably a proposal worthy of its own discussion, however, and I hope that I didn't cause any confusion by adding these thoughts to the merge discussion. —Sgt. R.K. Blue (talk) 15:33, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

It is an interesting thought, will take some work to get done though, so when this merge are decided on, one way or another, you could maybe write a new section about it. Jack Bornholm (talk) 17:10, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Request for Opinion

In Talk:United_States_Senate_election_in_Massachusetts,_2012#Polling_order, we are currently having a dispute concerning whether polls should be listed in chronological or reverse-chronological order. I am asking you because you seem to know these editors, you live in that area, and you're a skilled debater. Thanks! >>Light-jet pilot (talk) 23:56, 9 May 2012 (UTC)