User talk:INeverCry

Template:Archive box collapsible A kitten for you! Just found your user page after reviewing edits to Herb Tam. You are awesome! Aichikawa (talk) 21:32, 25 June 2012 (UTC) Thanks a lot Thanks for the help and the wish. When work has progresses to a significant degree, can I request you to take another look? Aditya(talk • contribs) 03:14, 27 June 2012 (UTC) I'd be happy to take a look whenever you like. INeverCry 04:51, 27 June 2012 (UTC) Thanks Thanks for all your work on poetry articles. It is seen and appreciated. Cheers. Span (talk) 23:47, 29 June 2012 (UTC) George Crabbe If I were you, I'd try to get it in the WP:GAN queue while the elimination drive is going on. You may get someone to review it very quickly. I am not someone who really reviews poet bios.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 05:03, 1 July 2012 (UTC) Good luck with the GA nomination. I haven't had time to look at the article lately, and won't have the time this morning; but if you think it'd help the cause, I'd be glad to go through and try to do some copy-editing this afternoon. Ammodramus (talk) 12:53, 1 July 2012 (UTC) Went through George Crabbe and made some copy-edits; hope that they improve the article's chances at a GA. If you've got the time and inclination, I think it'd be a good idea to break up the section titled "Critical reception". Much of that is about critical reception; but there's also some material about Crabbe's writing style, notably "Crabbe's poetry was predominantly in the form of heroic couplets". That feels out of place in the section. I'd suggest creating a separate section on form (meter, rhyme scheme, etc.) and themes in Crabbe's work, and following that section with a more focused one on critical reception. Ammodramus (talk) 03:33, 2 July 2012 (UTC) Sorry to learn that you've withdrawn the GA nomination. I sympathize with your difficulties with the critical-reception business, since I find myself in much the same boat re. Trollope. I'm fine with writing plot summaries and with the history of the work (writing circumstances, publication history, etc.), but I start feeling out of my depth when it comes to themes, current criticism, etc. Your time and effort haven't been wasted: you've still got a very good article, even if it's not a Good Article. Ammodramus (talk) 11:27, 2 July 2012 (UTC) Jayne Mansfield biographies One excellent idea. Please, go ahead with it. Aditya(talk • contribs) 03:48, 2 July 2012 (UTC) Great. I was thinking in the same line when you proposed the new format for the biography books. Aditya(talk • contribs) 08:07, 2 July 2012 (UTC) Yayyy. Absolutely awesome. Is it also possible to merge the references section with the book section? It's essentially the same set of books. Problem is that the harvrefs/shortcites need to link to the reference books (did I manage to mean what I meant?). Aditya(talk • contribs) 03:36, 3 July 2012 (UTC) Okies. Lemme give it a try on my own first. Aditya(talk • contribs) 04:24, 3 July 2012 (UTC) Barnstar The Literary Barnstar For your many services to literature and especially poetry. Span (talk) 18:51, 3 July 2012 (UTC) A very nice surprise. Thank you. INeverCry 19:53, 3 July 2012 (UTC) Health issues I know those things so well – and they can have the most dramatic effect on us, right through every aspect of us. They can be bastards. My heart goes out to you (along with any kind of good vibes which you might find acceptable). Pace yourself; take on enough challenges to be fun and stimulating, but not so many that they begin to overwhelm you. Always remember the benefits of good food, fresh air, and plenty of water! (most people are borderline dehydrated most of the time, and it has hard knock-on effects on everything else). Many hugz; look after yourself well. Pesky (talk) 05:09, 5 July 2012 (UTC) Your kind words are very much appreciated. I just wish there were more nice folks around, both here on wikipedia and in the wide world. I have to admit, though, that I happen to enjoy the occasional argument or heated discussion. That might come from the half of me that's Irish (my Mother is full Irish, and her and I really go at it now and then; nothing personal of course, we both love to "discuss" politics and social issues, and we always end with laughs and smiles :). My disability is certainly a bastard of the highest order, but I deal with it ok, and the kindness of others certainly helps. One thing that wikipedia does for me is to take my mind off my wretched body a bit. Anyways, I won't ramble on, but rather return the hugs and say thanks. INeverCry 21:28, 5 July 2012 (UTC) Haha! Wikipedia as displacement activity! Gawds, yes ... and thank you! Pesky (talk) 18:52, 7 July 2012 (UTC) Q re assessment of book on American Struggle for Independence Hello! Thanks for your assessment just now of a book article at Talk:Resistance, Politics, and the American Struggle for Independence, 1765-1775. I noticed that you assessed the article as class C, and that you appeared to have done the assessment quite rapidly, since your previous edit was only 1 minute earlier. If you have time, I'd be interested to know your suggestions for improving the article (i.e., what it was missing), so that it might become class B or higher. Feel free to respond on the article's talk page too. Thanks -- Presearch (talk) 22:53, 5 July 2012 (UTC) Thanks much for your response - knowing your thoughts is very useful. Those all surely are bona-fide quotes (since I'm careful about that), but obviously that wasn't clear; and your stylistic suggestions sound good. And thanks also for your suggestions about processes for getting further input for improving the article. All the best -- Presearch (talk) 00:15, 6 July 2012 (UTC) Thanks for barnstar - Fyodor Dostoyevsky Thank you very much, I appreciate it. Richard asr (talk) 20:39, 7 July 2012 (UTC)