Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sergio Urias: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 04:20, 20 September 2012

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. This is basically A7 with a slight twist; for the reasons Chaser explained, I find the "valedictorian" claim to be implausible. I'd usually not, however, shut down an AfD early, but in this case I think allowing a likely false claim inserted by someone who, to put it charitably, does not have anything close to a good track record, to be associated with the subject is highly inappropriate; any impression that the subject himself inserted the false claim would be extremely damaging to him, and this is even more important given the creator's chosen username. I'm doing this deletion explicitly under BLP special enforcement. T. Canens (talk) 04:10, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sergio Urias

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Mostly procedural nomination. Valedictorian at Harvard Law is enough of an assertion to notability that I'm not going to speedy this. But it's unusual such an achievement wouldn't be listed on someone's biography page, and I've never heard of someone at a law school for an LLM--often a one-year program--being declared the valedictorian. Any evidence of notability? Besides that, are the sources cited enough to satisfy our biography of living persons policy. I have no strong opinion yet. Chaser (talk) 03:06, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note; I've blocked the author of the article for legal threats. His other comments at the talkpage don't appear to really address the issues raised by Chaser. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 03:10, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was    '''speedy delete'''. This is basically A7 with a slight twist; for the reasons Chaser explained, I find the "valedictorian" claim to be implausible. I'd usually not, however, shut down an AfD early, but in this case I think allowing a likely false claim inserted by someone who, to put it charitably, does not have anything close to a good track record, to be associated with the subject is highly inappropriate; any impression that the subject himself inserted the false claim would be extremely damaging to him, and this is even more important given the creator's chosen username. I'm doing this deletion explicitly under [[WP:BLPSE|BLP special enforcement]]. [[User:Timotheus Canens|T. Canens]] ([[User talk:Timotheus Canens|talk]]) 04:10, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
-The result was    '''speedy delete'''. [[User:Timotheus Canens|T. Canens]] ([[User talk:Timotheus Canens|talk]]) 04:10, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
 ===[[Sergio Urias]]===