Jump to content

Talk:Resurrectionists in the United Kingdom/GA1: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎GA Review: replies
→‎GA Review: GA fail
Line 13: Line 13:


:The lead section is just fine and I shall not be shortening it. There is no need for quotes around resurrectionists, it's a perfectly valid noun. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">[[User:Parrot of Doom|Parrot]] [[User talk:Parrot of Doom|of Doom]]</span> 16:27, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
:The lead section is just fine and I shall not be shortening it. There is no need for quotes around resurrectionists, it's a perfectly valid noun. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">[[User:Parrot of Doom|Parrot]] [[User talk:Parrot of Doom|of Doom]]</span> 16:27, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

I see that you reverted my edits. You clearly have no intention to collaborate to improve the article. I am closing the review as GA fail. [[User:Axl|<font color="#808000">'''Axl'''</font>]] <font color="#3CB371">¤</font> <small>[[User talk:Axl|<font color="#808000">[Talk]</font>]]</small> 18:34, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:34, 2 February 2013

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Axl (talk · contribs) 14:44, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I shall review the article. Axl ¤ [Talk] 14:44, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The lead section is too long in comparison to the rest of the article. Please reduce the size of the lead section. Axl ¤ [Talk] 14:46, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

From the lead section, paragraph 2: "Faced with this paucity of supply, anatomists began to employ the services of resurrectionists." Perhaps put "resurrectionists" in inverted commas? Axl ¤ [Talk] 14:52, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The lead section is just fine and I shall not be shortening it. There is no need for quotes around resurrectionists, it's a perfectly valid noun. Parrot of Doom 16:27, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you reverted my edits. You clearly have no intention to collaborate to improve the article. I am closing the review as GA fail. Axl ¤ [Talk] 18:34, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]