Jump to content

User talk:Lecen: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
MediationBot (talk | contribs)
A request for formal mediation has been filed for a case in which you are involved
Line 41: Line 41:
<small>Message delivered by [[User:MediationBot|MediationBot]] ([[User talk:MediationBot|talk]]) on [[Wikipedia:Mediation Committee#MediationBot|behalf]] of the Mediation Committee. 11:38, 26 March 2013 (UTC)</small>
<small>Message delivered by [[User:MediationBot|MediationBot]] ([[User talk:MediationBot|talk]]) on [[Wikipedia:Mediation Committee#MediationBot|behalf]] of the Mediation Committee. 11:38, 26 March 2013 (UTC)</small>
}}
}}

== [[Pedro I of Brazil]] & [[Pedro II of Brazil]] ==

Will you ''PLEASE'' stop pushing your [[WP:OWN|ownership]] on those articles. [[User:GoodDay|GoodDay]] ([[User talk:GoodDay|talk]]) 14:49, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:49, 26 March 2013

No doubt;)

Sure thing- I'd be glad to help you. Thank you kindly for the compliment:). I'll get to it as soon as I have some spare time. Cheers Hoodinski (talk) 16:10, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Have a look at this. Hoodinski (talk) 10:39, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Corrections done. Sure I'd like to help you with maps- I love cartography:D. Hoodinski (talk) 13:23, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It'd be my pleasure, mate:). Hoodinski (talk) 15:11, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Sure thing mate. I'll get to it as soon as I've got a moment. Hoodinski (talk) 09:34, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There we are- Uruguayan War and Territorial disputes. Hoodinski (talk) 11:47, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re the Apa R.- that was actually a conscious decission since the river on the original map isn't well distinguished- I'm not sure where exactly does it start and end; also not sure whether it flows to Parana or Paraguay. I tried consulting with google maps but was unable to establish anything final. Hoodinski (talk) 13:29, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
My pleasure, mate. As I said before- I really like maps. So if you'd need some more of them just shoot. It'd be my pleasure. Cheers Hoodinski (talk) 18:10, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Portuguese invasion of the Eastern Bank (1811–1812) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Eeekster (talk) 21:03, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Lecen, I was going to leave a note on his page about the quick speedy, but there was a half-hour difference between creation and speedy nom. Maybe next time you could get a workable article together in your sandbox (say at User:Lecen/Sandbox/Portuguese invasion of the Eastern Bank (1811–1812)) and then move it into the mainspace? It might help you avoid these sorts of issues. :-) Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 21:20, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Request for arbitration: Argentine history

Your statement is excessively long and needs reducing. You should indicate to the Arbitration committee why they should take the case; should it be accepted you will be given ample opportunity to provide evidence and produce workshop proposals. Please refactor your request using this guidance, or myself or another clerk will do so. Alexandr Dmitri (talk) 16:39, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Formal mediation has been requested

The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Argentine history on Wikipedia". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 2 April 2013.

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 11:38, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Will you PLEASE stop pushing your ownership on those articles. GoodDay (talk) 14:49, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]