Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emily Addison (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 14:27, 23 May 2013

Emily Addison

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Has been recreated twice since the last AFD but this doesn't qualify for G4. What it does fail is WP:GNG and clearly lacks the required reliable sourcing to survive. If this closes as delete, please can the closing admin salt the page as we have multiple recreations here. Spartaz ^Humbug! 18:42, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:46, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:47, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:48, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails GNG as well as other suitable SNGs (ANYBIO, NMODEL, PORNBIO). Cavarrone (talk) 20:03, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails GNG. My search for reliable source coverage yielded a brief article in XBiz. No real claim of notability per NMODEL or PORNBIO. • Gene93k (talk) 00:58, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the various sound analyses above. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 21:11, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As has been said by other she fails the relevant guidelines. We should not have articles on people that are just not notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:01, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally this article was deleted a year ago and no one has presented any reason to change that outcome.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:06, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of Penthouse Pets because that seems to be her only real notability outside of her porn career, as she has never been nominated for anything (Twistys Treat notwithstanding). Erpert ^{Who is this guy? | Wanna talk about it?} 08:14, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 * '''Delete''' fails GNG as well as other suitable SNGs (ANYBIO, NMODEL, PORNBIO). [[User:Cavarrone|Cavarrone]] ([[User talk:Cavarrone|talk]]) 20:03, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
 *'''Delete'''. Fails GNG. My search for reliable source coverage yielded a brief article in XBiz. No real claim of notability per NMODEL or PORNBIO. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 00:58, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
-* '''Keep''' as is notable [[User:Davey2010|<font color="blue">'''''→Davey'''''</font><font color="blue">'''''2010→'''''</font>]][[User talk:Davey2010|<font color="orange">'''''→Talk to me!→'''''</font>]]
-**''[[WP:NOREASON|How]]'' is she notable, Davey? With all due respect, you never seem to explain this. '''<span style="color:orange;">Erpert</span>''' <small><sup><span style="color:green;">[[User:Erpert|Who ''is'' this guy?]]</span> | <span style="color:yellow;">[[User talk:Erpert|Wanna talk about it?]]</span></sup></small> 08:14, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 *'''Delete''' per the various sound analyses above. [[User:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz|Hullaballoo Wolfowitz]] ([[User talk:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz|talk]]) 21:11, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
 *'''Delete''' As has been said by other she fails the relevant guidelines.  We should not have articles on people that are just not notable.[[User:Johnpacklambert|John Pack Lambert]] ([[User talk:Johnpacklambert|talk]]) 22:01, 21 May 2013 (UTC)