General Aviation Revitalization Act: Difference between revisions
Added notes and references for Russ Meyer and Sen. John McCain, clarified language, corrected wiki links |
Add notes about 'foreign competition', insurance, other factors, Senate debate and participants, references, formatting |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
<ref name="angelley_summary">Angelley, William (attorney with aviation accident liability law firm Hightower/Angelley, LLP.), [http://www.hightangel.com/aviation-accident-information/2011/10/general-aviation-revitalization-act-of-1994/ General Aviation Revitalization Act of 1994], on October 25, 2011</ref> |
<ref name="angelley_summary">Angelley, William (attorney with aviation accident liability law firm Hightower/Angelley, LLP.), [http://www.hightangel.com/aviation-accident-information/2011/10/general-aviation-revitalization-act-of-1994/ General Aviation Revitalization Act of 1994], on October 25, 2011</ref> |
||
<ref name="public_citizen_gara_critique1">"[http://www.citizen.org/congress/article_redirect.cfm?ID=562 The General Aviation Act: When it Comes to Product Liability, Don't Believe What They Claim]," [[Public Citizen]] (non-profit public -interest advocacy group) website.</ref> |
<ref name="public_citizen_gara_critique1">"[http://www.citizen.org/congress/article_redirect.cfm?ID=562 The General Aviation Act: When it Comes to Product Liability, Don't Believe What They Claim]," [[Public Citizen]] (non-profit public -interest advocacy group) website.</ref> |
||
<ref name="aubert_trends_abc2004">Aubert, Garth W. and Michael A. Hession, "[http://www.aircraftbuilders.com/UserFiles/File/lr2004c.pdf Trends and Developments: The General Aviation Revitalization Act]," ''[http://www.aircraftbuilders.com/lawreport2004.html 2004 Law Report],'' Aircraft Builders Council. (a legalistic dissertation on the evolving use and interpretation of the statute).</ref> |
<ref name="aubert_trends_abc2004">Aubert, Garth W. and Michael A. Hession, "[http://www.aircraftbuilders.com/UserFiles/File/lr2004c.pdf Trends and Developments: The General Aviation Revitalization Act]," ''[http://www.aircraftbuilders.com/lawreport2004.html 2004 Law Report],'' Aircraft Builders Council. (a legalistic dissertation on the evolving use and interpretation of the statute).</ref> <ref name="truitt_tarry_rise_fall_of_gen_av">Truitt, Lawrence J. and Scott E. Tarry, "[http://www.freepatentsonline.com/article/Transportation-Journal/17572867.html The rise and fall of general aviation: product liability, market structure, and technological innovation]," in ''Transportation Journal'', June 22, 1995, American Society of Transportation and Logistics, Inc., as reproduced on the website ''FreePatentsOnline.com''</ref> |
||
* S. 1458 (103rd): General Aviation Revitalization Act of 1994 |
* Introduced as Senate Bill: S. 1458 (103rd): General Aviation Revitalization Act of 1994 |
||
* Introduced:Sep 14, 1993 (103rd Congress, 1993–1994) |
* Introduced: Sep 14, 1993 (103rd Congress, 1993–1994) |
||
* Sponsor: Sen. [[Nancy Kassebaum]] [R-KS] |
* Sponsor: Sen. [[Nancy Kassebaum]] [R-KS] |
||
* Signed by President [[Bill Clinton]], Aug 17, 1994. |
* Signed by President [[Bill Clinton]], Aug 17, 1994. |
||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
=== General Aviation Industry Decline in the 1980s/1990s === |
=== General Aviation Industry Decline in the 1980s/1990s === |
||
[[General aviation]] aircraft manufacturers, in the 1980s and 1990s began to terminate or reduce production of their piston-powered, propeller aircraft, or struggled with solvency.<ref name="forbes_2012_08_29_heart">Franson, Dave, "[http://www.forbes.com/sites/businessaviation/2012/08/29/did-economics-and-politics-cut-the-heart-out-of-personal-aviation/ Did Economics And Politics Cut The Heart Out Of Personal Aviation?]," ''Forbes'' magazine blog, August 29, 2012</ref> <ref name="mccain_speech_1993_11_09">[[John McCain|McCain, John]], U.S. Senator (R-Arizona), "[http://www.mccain.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressOffice.Speeches&ContentRecord_id=C553EEEA-CED4-4492-AA9C-7AB38346475F General Aviation Revitalization Legislation]", speech before the U.S. Senate, November 9, 1993, Washington, D.C.</ref> |
[[General aviation]] aircraft manufacturers, in the 1980s and 1990s began to terminate or reduce production of their piston-powered, propeller aircraft, or struggled with solvency.<ref name="forbes_2012_08_29_heart">Franson, Dave, "[http://www.forbes.com/sites/businessaviation/2012/08/29/did-economics-and-politics-cut-the-heart-out-of-personal-aviation/ Did Economics And Politics Cut The Heart Out Of Personal Aviation?]," ''Forbes'' magazine blog, August 29, 2012</ref> <ref name="mccain_speech_1993_11_09">[[John McCain|McCain, John]], U.S. Senator (R-Arizona), "[http://www.mccain.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressOffice.Speeches&ContentRecord_id=C553EEEA-CED4-4492-AA9C-7AB38346475F General Aviation Revitalization Legislation]", speech before the U.S. Senate, November 9, 1993, Washington, D.C.</ref> <ref name="bls_1993_06_acft_mfg_productivity">Kronemer, Alexander and J. Edwin Henneberger "[http://www.bls.gov/mfp/mprkh93.pdf Productivity in aircraft manufacturing]," ''Monthly Labor Review,'' June, 1993, Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Dept. of Commerce.</ref> |
||
General aviation aircraft production |
'''General aviation aircraft production''' in the U.S. dropped from approximately... |
||
* '''18,000 units in 1978'''<ref name="mccain_speech_1993_11_09" /> |
* '''18,000 units in 1978'''<ref name="mccain_speech_1993_11_09" /><ref name="bls_1993_06_acft_mfg_productivity" /> |
||
:: to only |
:: ...to only... |
||
* '''928 units in 1994'''. <ref name="clinton_statement_1994_08_17" /> <ref name="kovarik_gara_stretched_too_far" />(p.975) |
* '''928 units in 1994'''. <ref name="clinton_statement_1994_08_17" /> <ref name="kovarik_gara_stretched_too_far" />(p.975) |
||
(In a [http://www.mccain.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressOffice.Speeches&ContentRecord_id=C553EEEA-CED4-4492-AA9C-7AB38346475F 1993 speech], Sen. John McCain said "nearly 500 last year [1992]")<ref name="mccain_speech_1993_11_09" /> |
(In a [http://www.mccain.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressOffice.Speeches&ContentRecord_id=C553EEEA-CED4-4492-AA9C-7AB38346475F 1993 speech], Sen. John McCain said "nearly 500 last year [1992]")<ref name="mccain_speech_1993_11_09" /> |
||
At the time, industry analysts estimated the U.S. decline in general aviation aircraft manufacturing eliminated about 100,000 jobs -- sharply different from other segments of the global aerospace industry, where U.S. market share was still strong. |
At the time, industry analysts estimated the U.S. decline in general aviation aircraft manufacturing eliminated about 100,000 jobs -- sharply different from other segments of the global aerospace industry, where U.S. market share was still strong. <ref name="bls_1993_06_acft_mfg_productivity" /> <ref name="kovarik_gara_stretched_too_far" />(p.975) |
||
<ref name="kovarik_gara_stretched_too_far" />(p.975) |
|||
Those manufacturers' reported rapidly rising [[product liability]] costs, driving aircraft prices beyond the market, and they said their production cuts were in response to that growing liability. |
Those manufacturers' reported rapidly rising [[product liability]] costs, driving aircraft prices beyond the market, and they said their production cuts were in response to that growing liability. |
||
<ref name="mcnatt_symposium_gara">McNatt, Christopher C., Jr. and Steven L. England, "[https://litigation-essentials.lexisnexis.com/webcd/app?action=DocumentDisplay&crawlid=1&doctype=cite&docid=23+Transp.+L.+J.+323&srctype=smi&srcid=3B15&key=092652e42dfaf98bd53fab7ba40c4f55 SYMPOSIUM ON THE GENERAL AVIATION REVITALIZATION ACT: The Push for Statutes of Repose in General Aviation]," ''Transportation Law Journal,'' 23 Transp. L. J. 323, University of Denver, 1995, as posted on LexisNexis.com</ref> |
<ref name="mcnatt_symposium_gara">McNatt, Christopher C., Jr. and Steven L. England, "[https://litigation-essentials.lexisnexis.com/webcd/app?action=DocumentDisplay&crawlid=1&doctype=cite&docid=23+Transp.+L.+J.+323&srctype=smi&srcid=3B15&key=092652e42dfaf98bd53fab7ba40c4f55 SYMPOSIUM ON THE GENERAL AVIATION REVITALIZATION ACT: The Push for Statutes of Repose in General Aviation]," ''Transportation Law Journal,'' 23 Transp. L. J. 323, University of Denver, 1995, as posted on LexisNexis.com</ref> <ref name="kovarik_gara_stretched_too_far" />. |
||
<ref name="kovarik_gara_stretched_too_far" /> |
|||
'''Average cost of manufacturer's liability insurance for each airplane manufactured in the U.S.''' had risen from approximately... |
|||
* '''$50 per plane in 1962,''' |
|||
::...to... |
|||
* '''$100,000 per plane in 1988,''' |
|||
...according to a [http://www.bls.gov/mfp/mprkh93.pdf report cited by the Bureau of Labor Statistics] <ref name="bls_1993_06_acft_mfg_productivity" /> -- a 2,000-fold increase in 24 years. |
|||
Rising claims against the industry triggered a rapid increase in manufacturers' liability insurance premiums during the 1980s. Industry-wide, in just 7 years, the '''manufacturers' liability premiums inceased nearly nine-fold,''' from approximately |
|||
* '''$24 million in 1978''' |
|||
::...to... |
|||
* '''$210 million in 1985.''' |
|||
Insurance underwriters, worldwide, began to refuse to sell product liability insurance to U.S. general aviation manufacturers. By 1987, the three largest GA manufacturers claimed their annual costs for product liability ranged from $70,000 to $100,000 per airplane built and shipped that year. <ref name="truitt_tarry_rise_fall_of_gen_av" /> |
|||
Industry representatives and analysts variously blamed one or more of three general factors for rising product liability costs: |
Industry representatives and analysts variously blamed one or more of three general factors for rising product liability costs: |
||
# General aviation aircraft manufacturers chiefly specialized in |
# '''Long-lived products''' General aviation aircraft manufacturers chiefly specialized in small and light aircraft which often remained in operation for several decades after their manufacture -- much longer than automobiles or even most [[commercial aviation]] airliners. <ref name="metzenbaum_senate_1994_03_16" /> <ref name="bls_1993_06_acft_mfg_productivity" /> |
||
# |
# '''Higher fatality rate''' (per passenger, per mile traveled) for general aviation aircraft than most other forms of transportation.<ref name="harris_safe_airplane_not">Harris, Richard, "[http://harris1.net/eddy/Safe_Airplane_NOT.htm Safe Airplane -- NOT!]," from ''In Flight USA,'' July 2007, as reproduced on the ''Aviation Answer-Man'' website</ref> |
||
# |
# '''Changes in the legal system,''' including the rise of the '''rule of [[Sp[trict liability|strict liability]],''' increasingly applied by courts nationwide during the 1960s and 1970s, so that aircraft [[product liability]] lawsuits became '''a rapidly rising area of specialty for the legal profession''' in the 1980s, with some attorneys successfully specializing in targeting general aviation aircraft manufacturers and insurers.<ref name="truitt_tarry_rise_fall_of_gen_av" /> |
||
⚫ | |||
J. G., "[http://books.google.com/books/about/Air_transportation.html?id=Ej8Qslt1nfsC Air transportation:a management perspective]," (Google eBook), Ashgate Publishing, Ltd., 2007</ref> |
|||
⚫ | |||
* '''rising insurance rates and restrictions''' -- for manufacturers, operators, and maintenance providers -- largely in response to the previous issue,<ref name="kovarik_gara_stretched_too_far" /> |
* '''rising insurance rates and restrictions''' -- for manufacturers, operators, and maintenance providers -- largely in response to the previous issue,<ref name="kovarik_gara_stretched_too_far" /> |
||
* '''aircraft market saturation''' (due partly to accumulated numbers of old, but still flyable, light aircraft -- built in abundance during the industry's economically favorable "boom" years).<ref name="public_citizen_gara_critique1" /> |
* '''aircraft market saturation''' (due partly to accumulated numbers of old, but still flyable, light aircraft -- built in abundance during the industry's economically favorable "boom" years).<ref name="public_citizen_gara_critique1" /> |
||
* '''foreign competition''', and inadequate response by U.S. manufacturers <ref name="mccain_speech_1993_11_09" /> <ref name="nasa_sbir_1999_solicitation">"[http://sbir.gsfc.nasa.gov/SBIR/sbir99/phase1/solicitation/topic04.html TOPIC 04 General Aviation Revitalization]," in ''[http://sbir.gsfc.nasa.gov/SBIR/sbir99/phase1/solicitation/index.html Small Business Innovation Research 1999 Program Solicitation]'', National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)</ref> <ref name="usitc_1817">Ladomirak, Deborah C., William L. Greene and Diane Manifold, ''[http://books.google.com/books?id=C8s3WY-zCBMC&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false Competitive assessment of the U.S. commuter and business aircraft industries],'' Report on Investigation No. 332-204, Under Section 332 of the Tariff Act of 1930, USITC Publication 1817, [[United States International Trade Commission]], March 1986, as reproducd by GoogleBooks.com </ref>, |
|||
* '''changing demographics of income and wealth distribution,''' reducing the number of potential buyers,<ref name="public_citizen_gara_critique1" /> |
* '''changing demographics of income and wealth distribution,''' reducing the number of potential buyers,<ref name="public_citizen_gara_critique1" /> |
||
* sharply increased '''fuel costs''',<ref name="forbes_2012_08_29_heart" /> <ref name="mccain_speech_1993_11_09" /> |
* sharply increased '''fuel costs''',<ref name="forbes_2012_08_29_heart" /> <ref name="mccain_speech_1993_11_09" /> |
||
Line 54: | Line 67: | ||
The three leading general aviation aircraft manufacturers (accounting for over half of U.S. general aviation aircraft production) underwent major negative changes, which each blamed at least partially on rising product liability costs. |
The three leading general aviation aircraft manufacturers (accounting for over half of U.S. general aviation aircraft production) underwent major negative changes, which each blamed at least partially on rising product liability costs. |
||
* '''[[Cessna]] Aircraft Co.''' -- long the world's highest-volume aircraft producer, and largest general aviation aircraft manufacturer, (following acquisition by [[General Dynamics]] Corp.), suspended all propeller aircraft production (except the [[Cessna 208 Caravan]] commercial/utility turboprop) |
* '''[[Cessna]] Aircraft Co.''' -- long the world's highest-volume aircraft producer, and largest general aviation aircraft manufacturer, (following acquisition by [[General Dynamics]] Corp.), suspended all propeller aircraft production in 1986.<ref name="mccain_speech_1993_11_09" /> (except the [[Cessna 208 Caravan]] commercial/utility turboprop). Cessna Chairman [[Russell W. Meyer]] said it was in response to rising product liability costs, and Meyer promised to return Cessna to propeller aircraft production if (and when) the Congress passed satisfactory changes in product liability law. <ref name="kovarik_gara_stretched_too_far" /> <ref name="mccain_speech_1993_11_09" /> In the meantime, Cessna shifted its focus to business jets and commercial/utility turboprop aircraft.<ref name="public_citizen_gara_critique1" /> |
||
* '''[[Piper Aircraft]] Co.''' went in and out of bankruptcy, under various names, eliminating several long-popular models from its product line, such as the six-seat [[Piper PA-32]] "Cherokee Six"/"Saratoga".<ref name="mccain_speech_1993_11_09" /> |
* '''[[Piper Aircraft]] Co.''' went in and out of bankruptcy, under various names, eliminating several long-popular models from its product line, such as the six-seat [[Piper PA-32]] "Cherokee Six"/"Saratoga".<ref name="mccain_speech_1993_11_09" /> |
||
Line 70: | Line 83: | ||
'''Proponents (supporters)''' included: |
'''Proponents (supporters)''' included: |
||
* '''Kansas politicians''', led by Senator '''[[Nancy Kassebaum]]'''<ref name="kovarik_gara_stretched_too_far" /> <ref name="mccain_speech_1993_11_09" /> (Kansas is the nation's leading producer of general aviation aircraft)<ref name="ks_av_cent_longstory">Harris, Richard, "Kansas Aviation History: The Long Story", |
* '''Kansas politicians''', led by Senator '''[[Nancy Kassebaum]]'''<ref name="kovarik_gara_stretched_too_far" /> <ref name="mccain_speech_1993_11_09" /> (Kansas is the nation's leading producer of general aviation aircraft)<ref name="ks_av_cent_longstory">Harris, Richard, "Kansas Aviation History: The Long Story", ''Kansas Aviation Centennial'' Commitee website, as posted ca.Sept.2011.</ref>; |
||
* the '''[[General Aviation Manufacturers Association]] (GAMA)''', particularly represented by Russ Meyer, Cessna's Chairman & CEO;<ref name="kovarik_gara_stretched_too_far" /> <ref name="nahf_russ_meyer">[[Cessna]] Aircraft Company, in [[National Aviation Hall of Fame]] (NAHF) biography note, "[http://www.nationalaviation.org/meyer-jr-russell/ Russell W. Meyer, Jr.]: Promoter/Advocate, Enshrined 2009" Washington, DC, July 18, 2009, [[National Aviation Hall of Fame]] (NAHF) website, Dayton, Ohio</ref> <ref name="nbaa_russ_meyer_in_nahf">[[National Business Aircraft Association]] (NBAA) press release, "[http://www.nbaa.com/news/pr/2009/20090718-058.php NBAA Congratulates Aviation Legend Russ Meyer on Hall of Fame Induction]," Washington, DC, July 18, 2009</ref> |
* the '''[[General Aviation Manufacturers Association]] (GAMA)''', particularly represented by Russ Meyer, Cessna's Chairman & CEO;<ref name="kovarik_gara_stretched_too_far" /> <ref name="nahf_russ_meyer">[[Cessna]] Aircraft Company, in [[National Aviation Hall of Fame]] (NAHF) biography note, "[http://www.nationalaviation.org/meyer-jr-russell/ Russell W. Meyer, Jr.]: Promoter/Advocate, Enshrined 2009" Washington, DC, July 18, 2009, [[National Aviation Hall of Fame]] (NAHF) website, Dayton, Ohio</ref> <ref name="nbaa_russ_meyer_in_nahf">[[National Business Aircraft Association]] (NBAA) press release, "[http://www.nbaa.com/news/pr/2009/20090718-058.php NBAA Congratulates Aviation Legend Russ Meyer on Hall of Fame Induction]," Washington, DC, July 18, 2009</ref> |
||
Line 82: | Line 95: | ||
Members of Congress with connections to general aviation were among the forces mobilized to pass the legislation, including: |
'''Promoters included Members of Congress''' with connections to general aviation were among the forces mobilized to pass the legislation, including: |
||
* U.S. Senator [[Nancy Landon Kassebaum]], (R-Kansas) from the home state of [[Cessna]], [[Beech Aircraft]]/[[Raytheon Aircraft]], the [[Learjet]] div. of [[Bombardier Aircraft]], and [[light sport aircraft]] manufacturer [[RANS Aircraft]]. Kassebaum led the Congressional effort,<ref name="mccain_speech_1993_11_09" /> and co-sponsored the legislation with Rep. Glickman (below).<ref name="kovarik_gara_stretched_too_far" /> |
* U.S. Senator [[Nancy Landon Kassebaum]], (R-Kansas) from the home state of [[Cessna]], [[Beech Aircraft]]/[[Raytheon Aircraft]], the [[Learjet]] div. of [[Bombardier Aircraft]], and [[light sport aircraft]] manufacturer [[RANS Aircraft]]. Kassebaum led the Congressional effort,<ref name="mccain_speech_1993_11_09" /> and co-sponsored the legislation with Rep. Glickman (below).<ref name="kovarik_gara_stretched_too_far" /> |
||
Line 89: | Line 102: | ||
* U.S. Senator [[James Inhofe]] (R-Oklahoma), a general aviation pilot from the home state of [[Commander Aircraft]], provided substantial support to the proposed legislation. <ref>The Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association [http://www.aopa.org/feature/election08/congress.html says this about Inhofe]: "An active pilot for more than 50 years, aircraft owner and AOPA member, Sen. Jim Inhofe has been at the forefront of every aviation debate since arriving in Congress in 1986, offering his real-world perspective. He was a major force behind passage of the General Aviation Revitalization Act of 1994 that is credited with reviving aviation manufacturing in America."</ref> |
* U.S. Senator [[James Inhofe]] (R-Oklahoma), a general aviation pilot from the home state of [[Commander Aircraft]], provided substantial support to the proposed legislation. <ref>The Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association [http://www.aopa.org/feature/election08/congress.html says this about Inhofe]: "An active pilot for more than 50 years, aircraft owner and AOPA member, Sen. Jim Inhofe has been at the forefront of every aviation debate since arriving in Congress in 1986, offering his real-world perspective. He was a major force behind passage of the General Aviation Revitalization Act of 1994 that is credited with reviving aviation manufacturing in America."</ref> |
||
'''Congressional support''' included: |
|||
* U.S. Senator [[John McCain]], (R-Arizona), who gave a |
|||
[[http://www.mccain.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressOffice.Speeches&ContentRecord_id=C553EEEA-CED4-4492-AA9C-7AB38346475F sponsoring speech in favor of the GARA, Nov.11, 1993] on the floor of the U.S. Senate, |
|||
* U.S. Senator [[Kay Bailey Hutchison]], (R-Texas), who offered a defense to Sen. Metzenbaum's critique, [http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CREC-1994-03-16/html/CREC-1994-03-16-pt1-PgS7.htm remarks, March 16, 1994] on the floor of the U.S. Senate. <ref name="metzenbaum_senate_1994_03_16">Metzenbaum, Howard, U.S. Senator, [http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CREC-1994-03-16/html/CREC-1994-03-16-pt1-PgS7.htm remarks before the U.S. Senate,], Congressional Record, Volume 140 Issue 29 (Wednesday, March 16, 1994)</ref> |
|||
'''Congressinnal opposition''' included: |
|||
* U.S. Senator [[Howard Metzenbaum]], (D-Ohio), who gave [http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CREC-1994-03-16/html/CREC-1994-03-16-pt1-PgS7.htm a detailed speech, March 16, 1994] on the floor of the U.S. Senate, critiquing the proposed provisions of the GARA.<ref name="metzenbaum_senate_1994_03_16" /> |
|||
In "[http://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/sulr/vol31/iss4/15 A Good Idea Stretched Too Far: Amending the General Aviation Revitalization Act to Mitigate Unintended Inequities]," (''Seattle Univ. Law Review,'' vol.31/p.973, Jan.2008), Kerry Kovarik argues that the exact language of the final draft of the Act exceeded the intent of Congress -- as indicated by the generating committees and the Congressional debate record -- creating "inequities" and poor judicial interpretations, with unintended negative consequences for crash victims, far beyond what Congress intended -- to include any aircraft with less than 20 passenger seats, operated in any activity other than scheduled commercial service, including helicopters and business jets, despite a lack of Congressional discussion of those exemptions.<ref name="kovarik_gara_stretched_too_far" />(p.982) |
In "[http://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/sulr/vol31/iss4/15 A Good Idea Stretched Too Far: Amending the General Aviation Revitalization Act to Mitigate Unintended Inequities]," (''Seattle Univ. Law Review,'' vol.31/p.973, Jan.2008), Kerry Kovarik argues that the exact language of the final draft of the Act exceeded the intent of Congress -- as indicated by the generating committees and the Congressional debate record -- creating "inequities" and poor judicial interpretations, with unintended negative consequences for crash victims, far beyond what Congress intended -- to include any aircraft with less than 20 passenger seats, operated in any activity other than scheduled commercial service, including helicopters and business jets, despite a lack of Congressional discussion of those exemptions.<ref name="kovarik_gara_stretched_too_far" />(p.982) |
||
Line 180: | Line 204: | ||
Kovarik, Kerry V., "[http://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/sulr/vol31/iss4/15 A Good Idea Stretched Too Far: Amending the General Aviation Revitalization Act to Mitigate Unintended Inequities]," ''Seattle University Law Review'', Vol. 31, No. 4 (2008), Jan.2008, p.973, Seattle Univ. School of Law, Seattle, WA, USA [http://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1843&context=sulr PDF download]. |
Kovarik, Kerry V., "[http://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/sulr/vol31/iss4/15 A Good Idea Stretched Too Far: Amending the General Aviation Revitalization Act to Mitigate Unintended Inequities]," ''Seattle University Law Review'', Vol. 31, No. 4 (2008), Jan.2008, p.973, Seattle Univ. School of Law, Seattle, WA, USA [http://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1843&context=sulr PDF download]. |
||
Ladomirak, Deborah C., William L. Greene and Diane Manifold, ''[http://books.google.com/books?id=C8s3WY-zCBMC&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false Competitive assessment of the U.S. commuter and business aircraft industries],'' Report on Investigation No. 332-204, Under Section 332 of the Tariff Act of 1930, USITC Publication 1817, [[United States International Trade Commission]], March 1986, as reproducd by GoogleBooks.com |
|||
Truitt, Lawrence J. and Scott E. Tarry, "[http://www.freepatentsonline.com/article/Transportation-Journal/17572867.html The rise and fall of general aviation: product liability, market structure, and technological innovation]," |
|||
''Transportation Journal'', June 22, 1995, American Society of Transportation and Logistics, Inc. |
|||
, as reproduced on the website ''FreePatentsOnline.com''' |
|||
Aubert, Garth W. and Michael A. Hession, "[http://www.aircraftbuilders.com/UserFiles/File/lr2004c.pdf Trends and Developments: The General Aviation Revitalization Act]," ''[http://www.aircraftbuilders.com/lawreport2004.html 2004 Law Report],'' Aircraft Builders Council. (a legalistic dissertation on the evolving use and interpretation of the statute). |
Aubert, Garth W. and Michael A. Hession, "[http://www.aircraftbuilders.com/UserFiles/File/lr2004c.pdf Trends and Developments: The General Aviation Revitalization Act]," ''[http://www.aircraftbuilders.com/lawreport2004.html 2004 Law Report],'' Aircraft Builders Council. (a legalistic dissertation on the evolving use and interpretation of the statute). |
Revision as of 13:02, 26 May 2013
The General Aviation Revitalization Act of 1994 -- also known by its initials GARA -- is Public Law 103-298, an Act of Congress on Senate Bill S. 1458 (103rd Congress), amending the Federal Aviation Act of 1958.
It was intended to counteract the effects of prolonged product liability on general aviation aircraft manufacturers, by limiting the duration of their liability for the aircraft they produce.
GARA is a statute of repose generally shielding most manufacturers of aircraft (carrying fewer than 20 passengers), and aircraft parts, from liability for most accidents (including injury or fatality accidents) involving their products that are 18 years old or older (at the time of the accident) -- even if manufacturer negligence was a cause. Debate continues over the efficacy and fairness of GARA. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
- Introduced as Senate Bill: S. 1458 (103rd): General Aviation Revitalization Act of 1994
- Introduced: Sep 14, 1993 (103rd Congress, 1993–1994)
- Sponsor: Sen. Nancy Kassebaum [R-KS]
- Signed by President Bill Clinton, Aug 17, 1994.
- The bill’s title was written by the bill’s sponsor.
History
General Aviation Industry Decline in the 1980s/1990s
General aviation aircraft manufacturers, in the 1980s and 1990s began to terminate or reduce production of their piston-powered, propeller aircraft, or struggled with solvency.[8] [9] [10]
General aviation aircraft production in the U.S. dropped from approximately...
- ...to only...
(In a 1993 speech, Sen. John McCain said "nearly 500 last year [1992]")[9]
At the time, industry analysts estimated the U.S. decline in general aviation aircraft manufacturing eliminated about 100,000 jobs -- sharply different from other segments of the global aerospace industry, where U.S. market share was still strong. [10] [2](p.975)
Those manufacturers' reported rapidly rising product liability costs, driving aircraft prices beyond the market, and they said their production cuts were in response to that growing liability. [11] [2].
Average cost of manufacturer's liability insurance for each airplane manufactured in the U.S. had risen from approximately...
- $50 per plane in 1962,
- ...to...
- $100,000 per plane in 1988,
...according to a report cited by the Bureau of Labor Statistics [10] -- a 2,000-fold increase in 24 years.
Rising claims against the industry triggered a rapid increase in manufacturers' liability insurance premiums during the 1980s. Industry-wide, in just 7 years, the manufacturers' liability premiums inceased nearly nine-fold, from approximately
- $24 million in 1978
- ...to...
- $210 million in 1985.
Insurance underwriters, worldwide, began to refuse to sell product liability insurance to U.S. general aviation manufacturers. By 1987, the three largest GA manufacturers claimed their annual costs for product liability ranged from $70,000 to $100,000 per airplane built and shipped that year. [6]
Industry representatives and analysts variously blamed one or more of three general factors for rising product liability costs:
- Long-lived products General aviation aircraft manufacturers chiefly specialized in small and light aircraft which often remained in operation for several decades after their manufacture -- much longer than automobiles or even most commercial aviation airliners. [12] [10]
- Higher fatality rate (per passenger, per mile traveled) for general aviation aircraft than most other forms of transportation.[13]
- Changes in the legal system, including the rise of the rule of [[Sp[trict liability|strict liability]], increasingly applied by courts nationwide during the 1960s and 1970s, so that aircraft product liability lawsuits became a rapidly rising area of specialty for the legal profession in the 1980s, with some attorneys successfully specializing in targeting general aviation aircraft manufacturers and insurers.[6]
However, other economics of general aviation had also begun to erode the market for light aircraft, including:[14]
- rising insurance rates and restrictions -- for manufacturers, operators, and maintenance providers -- largely in response to the previous issue,[2]
- aircraft market saturation (due partly to accumulated numbers of old, but still flyable, light aircraft -- built in abundance during the industry's economically favorable "boom" years).[4]
- foreign competition, and inadequate response by U.S. manufacturers [9] [15] [16],
- changing demographics of income and wealth distribution, reducing the number of potential buyers,[4]
- sharply increased fuel costs,[8] [9]
- urban sprawl competing with airport space,[17](pp.6-8)
- regulatory restrictions.[9]
As a consequence of these factors, apparently, general aviation aircraft manufacturers began to experience sharply declining revenues and rising costs, in the 1980s, with resulting declines in income and rising contingent liabilities.[4]
The three leading general aviation aircraft manufacturers (accounting for over half of U.S. general aviation aircraft production) underwent major negative changes, which each blamed at least partially on rising product liability costs.
- Cessna Aircraft Co. -- long the world's highest-volume aircraft producer, and largest general aviation aircraft manufacturer, (following acquisition by General Dynamics Corp.), suspended all propeller aircraft production in 1986.[9] (except the Cessna 208 Caravan commercial/utility turboprop). Cessna Chairman Russell W. Meyer said it was in response to rising product liability costs, and Meyer promised to return Cessna to propeller aircraft production if (and when) the Congress passed satisfactory changes in product liability law. [2] [9] In the meantime, Cessna shifted its focus to business jets and commercial/utility turboprop aircraft.[4]
- Piper Aircraft Co. went in and out of bankruptcy, under various names, eliminating several long-popular models from its product line, such as the six-seat Piper PA-32 "Cherokee Six"/"Saratoga".[9]
- Beech Aircraft Co. was acquired by Raytheon Corporation (and renamed Raytheon Aircraft), and shifted its emphasis away from general aviation propeller aircraft, like the Beech Bonanza and Beech Baron -- and discontinuing all other piston-propeller aircraft models (from 2-seat, single-engine Model 77 Beech Skipper trainer to 7-seat, twin-engine, pressurized Model 60 Beech Duke) -- shifting company emphasis towards professionally operated corporate turboprops and business jets, and small military and commercial aircraft.
As a consequence of these changes, and others, the general aviation industry began to suffer from a shortage of new aircraft -- particularly for training, rental and charter use. (The three main training planes of the industry in the 1980s -- the two-seat Cessna 152, Piper Tomahawk, and Beech Skipper -- were removed from the market in the mid-1980s, and never returned.)
GARA Promoted & Opposed
Opponents included (chiefly):
- The Association of Trial Lawyers of America (ATLA)[2]
- Public-interest advocacy groups, including Public Citizen.[4]
Proponents (supporters) included:
- Kansas politicians, led by Senator Nancy Kassebaum[2] [9] (Kansas is the nation's leading producer of general aviation aircraft)[18];
- the General Aviation Manufacturers Association (GAMA), particularly represented by Russ Meyer, Cessna's Chairman & CEO;[2] [19] [20]
- the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers Union (IAM)/(IAMAW) -- the labor union representing workers at several general aviation manufacturers' factories;[2] [9]
- the Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association (AOPA), the main U.S. organization for general aviation aircraft owners and pilots.[2]
During the 1980s and 1990s, under the leadership of Cessna Chairman Russ Meyer and Ed Stimpson, President of the General Aviation Manufacturers Association (GAMA), the industry pressured Congress, for several years, to enact limits on aircraft manufacturers product liability. [2] [19] [20]
Promoters included Members of Congress with connections to general aviation were among the forces mobilized to pass the legislation, including:
- U.S. Senator Nancy Landon Kassebaum, (R-Kansas) from the home state of Cessna, Beech Aircraft/Raytheon Aircraft, the Learjet div. of Bombardier Aircraft, and light sport aircraft manufacturer RANS Aircraft. Kassebaum led the Congressional effort,[9] and co-sponsored the legislation with Rep. Glickman (below).[2]
- U.S. Representative Dan Glickman, (D-Kansas) from Wichita, -- "the Air Capital City" -- the hometown of Cessna, Beech Aircraft/Raytheon Aircraft, and the Learjet div. of Bombardier Aircraft, and many other aviation enterprises. Glickman co-sponsored the legislation with Sen. Kassebaum (above).[2]
- U.S. Senator James Inhofe (R-Oklahoma), a general aviation pilot from the home state of Commander Aircraft, provided substantial support to the proposed legislation. [21]
Congressional support included:
- U.S. Senator John McCain, (R-Arizona), who gave a
[sponsoring speech in favor of the GARA, Nov.11, 1993 on the floor of the U.S. Senate,
- U.S. Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison, (R-Texas), who offered a defense to Sen. Metzenbaum's critique, remarks, March 16, 1994 on the floor of the U.S. Senate. [12]
Congressinnal opposition included:
- U.S. Senator Howard Metzenbaum, (D-Ohio), who gave a detailed speech, March 16, 1994 on the floor of the U.S. Senate, critiquing the proposed provisions of the GARA.[12]
In "A Good Idea Stretched Too Far: Amending the General Aviation Revitalization Act to Mitigate Unintended Inequities," (Seattle Univ. Law Review, vol.31/p.973, Jan.2008), Kerry Kovarik argues that the exact language of the final draft of the Act exceeded the intent of Congress -- as indicated by the generating committees and the Congressional debate record -- creating "inequities" and poor judicial interpretations, with unintended negative consequences for crash victims, far beyond what Congress intended -- to include any aircraft with less than 20 passenger seats, operated in any activity other than scheduled commercial service, including helicopters and business jets, despite a lack of Congressional discussion of those exemptions.[2](p.982)
GARA Passed
The General Aviation Revitalization Act was passed by the Congress in 1994, and signed by President Bill Clinton in a White House ceremony August 17, 1994.[1]
The final law exempted manufacturers of general aviation aircraft (aircraft with less than 20 passenger seats, not operated in schedueled commercial service), and their component parts, from liability for any of their products that were 18 years old or older at the time of the accident. [3]
Certain exceptions apply:[5][11]
- If the manufacturer withheld or concealed information from the FAA, or misrepresented information, that is directly related to the accident's cause;
- If the accident victim is a passenger on an air ambulance flight, or otherwise in flight, to get medical treatment;
- If an otherwise-exempt aircraft killed or injured someone not aboard the aircraft (e.g.: a person on the ground, struck by the aircraft); or
- In suits over a written warranty involving an otherwise-exempt aircraft.
Further, the statute is a "rolling" statute: The "clock" resets when modified or replacement parts are installed, so that an 20-year-old aircraft may still be the object of a successful suit against a manufacturer if it contains manufacturer modifications or parts installed within the last 18 years.[5][11]
Outcomes
There is debate about the results of the GARA. Some believe it has revitalized the industry, and some believe it has made little difference -- even encouraging continued or resumed production of high-risk vehicles.
Manufacturing Outcomes
Among the three leading general aviation manufacturers, the following changes have occurred following passage of the GARA:
- Cessna Aircraft Co., was acquired by Textron Corp., and in 1994, shortly after passage of the GARA, resumed very limited propeller aircraft production of its three most popular (and statistically safest) models that had been suspended in 1986:
- Cessna 172/Skyhawk,
- Cessna 182/Skylane, and
- Cessna 206/Stationair
- Cessna Chairman & CEO Russell W. Meyer said it was in response to passage of GARA, and in keeping with his "promise."
- However, Cessna did not resume production most of its propeller aircraft line, including it's most efficient and high-performance piston-propeller aircraft, or any of its twin-engined propeller aircraft. Cessna continued to focus chiefly on business jets and commercial/utility turboprop aircraft.[2](p.985)
- Piper Aircraft Co. continued in and out of bankruptcy, but continued producing the planes that had survived during the 1980s, and restored some that it had cut from its product line, such as the Piper PA-32, reintroduced in 1995, the year after GARA was enacted.
- Beech Aircraft Co. / Raytheon Aircraft), and continued production of the general aviation piston-propeller aircraft models that had survived the pre-GARA shakeout -- the Beech Bonanza and Beech Baron but never restored any of the propeller planes that it had cut during the GARA debate.
- Beech/Raytheon continued to focus on professionally-operated corporate turboprops and business jets, and small military and commercial aircraft, as it struggled with many problems that led to its sale to Onex Corp., renamed as Hawker-Beechcraft, ultimately declaring bankruptcy in 2012 -- shedding its troubled business jet line to become Beechcraft in 2013, selling only propeller aircraft (and military drones).
The General Accounting Office of the U.S. Congress estimated, after GARA's passage, that 25,000 new jobs had been created -- exactly the quantity predicted at the hearings.
[2](p.985)
However, the public-interest advocacy group Public Citizen has cited testimony March 1997 by Cessna senior vice president John E. Moore, before the Senate Commerce Committee, March 6, 1997, acknowledging that Cessna's product liability costs had not been reduced after the passage of the GARA.[4]
In fact, various light plane prices (including some Piper, Beech and reintroduced Cessna planes) went up sharply during the early years of GARA, leaving doubt about industry representatives' claims that GARA would cut airplane prices. [4][8]
Liability Diffusion
Since GARA, attorneys have begun pressing other segments of the general aviation industry and community as alternative defendants to the manufacturers, including:
- parts manufacturers
- maintenance organizations
- flight instructors and utility/charter pilots
- flight schools
- aircraft owners' insurance and personal assets.
(This list includes "FBOs" (fixed-base operators) typically airport-based aviation service businesses providing flight training, charter flying, rental aircraft, aircraft storage, fueling and/or maintenance.)[2](p.985-986)
The result of shifted liability focus has been an increase in costs elsewhere in the industry, and directly to aircraft owners and pilots, and their estates.[2](p.985-986)
Safety Outcomes
Libertarian economists (Eric Helland) (Claremont McKenna College) and (Alexander Tabarrok), (George Mason University) have argued that the outcomes of GARA demonstrate that product liability limits motivate safer behavior by consumers. [22] (article summary by author Alex Tabarrok at: "Aviation, Liability Law, and Moral Hazard" [23]
However, others have argued that safety improvement in general aviation has been chiefly the result of a market shift away from owner-flown aircraft, towards professionally operated aircraft, and due to other changes, such as improving technology.
References
- ^ a b c Clinton, William J., President of the United States, "Statement on Signing the General Aviation Revitalization Act of 1994, August 17, 1994," online by Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley, The Presidency Project online archives, Univ. of California at Santa Barbara.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s Kovarik, Kerry V., "A Good Idea Stretched Too Far: Amending the General Aviation Revitalization Act to Mitigate Unintended Inequities," Seattle University Law Review, Vol. 31, No. 4 (2008), Jan.2008, p.973, Seattle Univ. School of Law, Seattle, WA, USA PDF download.
- ^ a b Angelley, William (attorney with aviation accident liability law firm Hightower/Angelley, LLP.), General Aviation Revitalization Act of 1994, on October 25, 2011
- ^ a b c d e f g h "The General Aviation Act: When it Comes to Product Liability, Don't Believe What They Claim," Public Citizen (non-profit public -interest advocacy group) website. Cite error: The named reference "public_citizen_gara_critique1" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
- ^ a b c Aubert, Garth W. and Michael A. Hession, "Trends and Developments: The General Aviation Revitalization Act," 2004 Law Report, Aircraft Builders Council. (a legalistic dissertation on the evolving use and interpretation of the statute).
- ^ a b c Truitt, Lawrence J. and Scott E. Tarry, "The rise and fall of general aviation: product liability, market structure, and technological innovation," in Transportation Journal, June 22, 1995, American Society of Transportation and Logistics, Inc., as reproduced on the website FreePatentsOnline.com
- ^ "General Aviation Revitalization Act of 1994", (1994; 103rd Congress S_ 1458), on GovTrack_us
- ^ a b c Franson, Dave, "Did Economics And Politics Cut The Heart Out Of Personal Aviation?," Forbes magazine blog, August 29, 2012
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l McCain, John, U.S. Senator (R-Arizona), "General Aviation Revitalization Legislation", speech before the U.S. Senate, November 9, 1993, Washington, D.C.
- ^ a b c d e Kronemer, Alexander and J. Edwin Henneberger "Productivity in aircraft manufacturing," Monthly Labor Review, June, 1993, Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Dept. of Commerce.
- ^ a b c McNatt, Christopher C., Jr. and Steven L. England, "SYMPOSIUM ON THE GENERAL AVIATION REVITALIZATION ACT: The Push for Statutes of Repose in General Aviation," Transportation Law Journal, 23 Transp. L. J. 323, University of Denver, 1995, as posted on LexisNexis.com
- ^ a b c Metzenbaum, Howard, U.S. Senator, remarks before the U.S. Senate,, Congressional Record, Volume 140 Issue 29 (Wednesday, March 16, 1994)
- ^ Harris, Richard, "Safe Airplane -- NOT!," from In Flight USA, July 2007, as reproduced on the Aviation Answer-Man website
- ^ Wensveen, J. G., "Air transportation:a management perspective," (Google eBook), Ashgate Publishing, Ltd., 2007
- ^ "TOPIC 04 General Aviation Revitalization," in Small Business Innovation Research 1999 Program Solicitation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
- ^ Ladomirak, Deborah C., William L. Greene and Diane Manifold, Competitive assessment of the U.S. commuter and business aircraft industries, Report on Investigation No. 332-204, Under Section 332 of the Tariff Act of 1930, USITC Publication 1817, United States International Trade Commission, March 1986, as reproducd by GoogleBooks.com
- ^ Rodwell, J.F., Essentials of Aviation Management: A Guide for Aviation Service Businesses, Kendall Hunt, 2003, on Google Books
- ^ Harris, Richard, "Kansas Aviation History: The Long Story", Kansas Aviation Centennial Commitee website, as posted ca.Sept.2011.
- ^ a b Cessna Aircraft Company, in National Aviation Hall of Fame (NAHF) biography note, "Russell W. Meyer, Jr.: Promoter/Advocate, Enshrined 2009" Washington, DC, July 18, 2009, National Aviation Hall of Fame (NAHF) website, Dayton, Ohio
- ^ a b National Business Aircraft Association (NBAA) press release, "NBAA Congratulates Aviation Legend Russ Meyer on Hall of Fame Induction," Washington, DC, July 18, 2009
- ^ The Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association says this about Inhofe: "An active pilot for more than 50 years, aircraft owner and AOPA member, Sen. Jim Inhofe has been at the forefront of every aviation debate since arriving in Congress in 1986, offering his real-world perspective. He was a major force behind passage of the General Aviation Revitalization Act of 1994 that is credited with reviving aviation manufacturing in America."
- ^ Helland, Eric A. and Alexander Tabarrok, "Product Liability and Moral Hazard: Evidence from General Aviation," Journal of Law and Economics, 2012, vol. 55, issue 3, pages 593 - 630, available on EconPapers.com, or on JSTOR.org
- ^ Tabarrok, Alex (blog) "Aviation, Liability Law, and Moral Hazard," February 19, 2013.
See Also
"GARA: The General Aviation Revitalization Act of 1994 (Public Law 103-298)," AVweb.com, complete text of the 1994 law, as provided by The Editors of AVweb, from documents Provided by the U.S. Department of Transportation, January 14, 2001
Clinton, William J., President of the United States, "Statement on Signing the General Aviation Revitalization Act of 1994, August 17, 1994," online by Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley, The Presidency Project online archives, Univ. of California at Santa Barbara.
C-Span Video, "House Session June 27, 1994," video and notes, C-Span Video Library, Washington, D.C. (video of House of Representatives discussion of GARA and other topics.).
Kovarik, Kerry V., "A Good Idea Stretched Too Far: Amending the General Aviation Revitalization Act to Mitigate Unintended Inequities," Seattle University Law Review, Vol. 31, No. 4 (2008), Jan.2008, p.973, Seattle Univ. School of Law, Seattle, WA, USA PDF download.
Ladomirak, Deborah C., William L. Greene and Diane Manifold, Competitive assessment of the U.S. commuter and business aircraft industries, Report on Investigation No. 332-204, Under Section 332 of the Tariff Act of 1930, USITC Publication 1817, United States International Trade Commission, March 1986, as reproducd by GoogleBooks.com
Truitt, Lawrence J. and Scott E. Tarry, "The rise and fall of general aviation: product liability, market structure, and technological innovation," Transportation Journal, June 22, 1995, American Society of Transportation and Logistics, Inc. , as reproduced on the website FreePatentsOnline.com'
Aubert, Garth W. and Michael A. Hession, "Trends and Developments: The General Aviation Revitalization Act," 2004 Law Report, Aircraft Builders Council. (a legalistic dissertation on the evolving use and interpretation of the statute).