User talk:Thargor Orlando: Difference between revisions
→Edit warring on March Against Monsanto: Two edits in 5 months is not "edit warring." If you can't understand the discussion on a talk page, perhaps this isn't the hobby for you. |
→Edit warring on March Against Monsanto: transparent |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
:::There has been absolutely no progress on either the talk page or in the article aside from outright deletion of material you solely object to alone. You've also been edit warring on multiple pages such as [[Independence Institute]], where you have repeatedly added a maintenance tag ''for no reason'' without any commentary on talk. Again, this is not how we use tags. Editors aren't required to telepathically communicate with you or guess your unstated reasons. And please don't offer another "I don't like it" rationale. Use the talk page if there's a problem, but use it to make good arguments based on evidence, not your personal beliefs. [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 04:33, 13 June 2013 (UTC) |
:::There has been absolutely no progress on either the talk page or in the article aside from outright deletion of material you solely object to alone. You've also been edit warring on multiple pages such as [[Independence Institute]], where you have repeatedly added a maintenance tag ''for no reason'' without any commentary on talk. Again, this is not how we use tags. Editors aren't required to telepathically communicate with you or guess your unstated reasons. And please don't offer another "I don't like it" rationale. Use the talk page if there's a problem, but use it to make good arguments based on evidence, not your personal beliefs. [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 04:33, 13 June 2013 (UTC) |
||
::::Two edits in 5 months is not "edit warring." If you can't understand the discussion on a talk page, perhaps this isn't the hobby for you. [[User:Thargor Orlando|Thargor Orlando]] ([[User talk:Thargor Orlando#top|talk]]) 13:00, 13 June 2013 (UTC) |
::::Two edits in 5 months is not "edit warring." If you can't understand the discussion on a talk page, perhaps this isn't the hobby for you. [[User:Thargor Orlando|Thargor Orlando]] ([[User talk:Thargor Orlando#top|talk]]) 13:00, 13 June 2013 (UTC) |
||
::::::If you think you are fooling anyone with your pro-Monsanto, ALEC-funded, Independentce Institute lobbying on Wikipedia, you are sadly wrong. [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 02:43, 15 June 2013 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 02:43, 15 June 2013
Archives
Edit warring on March Against Monsanto
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Viriditas (talk) 02:04, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
- Further note: you were previously warned about edit warring here, so this isn't your first warning. Viriditas (talk) 02:08, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
- I guess someone who was previously blocked for two weeks for edit warring might know, but if you've paid any attention at talk, you'd know we've progressed. And looking further, you template one guy with two reverts, but not the one who supports your POV edits. Pretty telling right there. Thargor Orlando (talk) 03:03, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
- There has been absolutely no progress on either the talk page or in the article aside from outright deletion of material you solely object to alone. You've also been edit warring on multiple pages such as Independence Institute, where you have repeatedly added a maintenance tag for no reason without any commentary on talk. Again, this is not how we use tags. Editors aren't required to telepathically communicate with you or guess your unstated reasons. And please don't offer another "I don't like it" rationale. Use the talk page if there's a problem, but use it to make good arguments based on evidence, not your personal beliefs. Viriditas (talk) 04:33, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
- Two edits in 5 months is not "edit warring." If you can't understand the discussion on a talk page, perhaps this isn't the hobby for you. Thargor Orlando (talk) 13:00, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
- If you think you are fooling anyone with your pro-Monsanto, ALEC-funded, Independentce Institute lobbying on Wikipedia, you are sadly wrong. Viriditas (talk) 02:43, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
- Two edits in 5 months is not "edit warring." If you can't understand the discussion on a talk page, perhaps this isn't the hobby for you. Thargor Orlando (talk) 13:00, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
- There has been absolutely no progress on either the talk page or in the article aside from outright deletion of material you solely object to alone. You've also been edit warring on multiple pages such as Independence Institute, where you have repeatedly added a maintenance tag for no reason without any commentary on talk. Again, this is not how we use tags. Editors aren't required to telepathically communicate with you or guess your unstated reasons. And please don't offer another "I don't like it" rationale. Use the talk page if there's a problem, but use it to make good arguments based on evidence, not your personal beliefs. Viriditas (talk) 04:33, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
- I guess someone who was previously blocked for two weeks for edit warring might know, but if you've paid any attention at talk, you'd know we've progressed. And looking further, you template one guy with two reverts, but not the one who supports your POV edits. Pretty telling right there. Thargor Orlando (talk) 03:03, 13 June 2013 (UTC)