User talk:TheRedPenOfDoom

File:Grumpy Cat & Lil Bub.jpg

Grumpy meter
← ← ← ← ← ← ← ← ← ← ← ← ← ← ← ← ← ← ←

And there is also This archive.

Supriya Pathak

I saw what you did at Supriya Pathak. I asked you nicely but you took it on your ego and vented your frustration by blanking more sections of the page. If you really want to remove unsourced or poorly sourced info then why don't you give some time to other editors so that they can properly add sources.

You are clearly discouraging other editors who are still learning like me. You just want to be superior to others. First you want sources and when you are provided with them, you call them bad and unreliable. You should be encouraging people but it seems like you are on a mission to prove something.

Sorry for my this behavior but you kind of disappointed and demoralized me today. Sorry for bad English. LOL!

date stamp -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 23:43, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Grover again

Hello, the last line on the Karan Singh Grover biography page is unnecessary as KSG has done a lot more work, and I don't see why only Qubool Hai should be mentioned! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nkapoor21 (talk • contribs)

Check pls

Hi could you have a look if this article should exist on wiki? Doga (film). Thanks Daan0001 (talk) 18:06, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

2014 Spring, Texas shooting

Hi there. I know you're good at this sort of thing. Would you have a moment to look at 2014 Spring, Texas shooting. It's a new article and I don't feel comfortable with a lot of it. There's much detail about the shooter, listing his name, gender, home town and so forth. My beef it that the shooter is still an "alleged" shooter, and hasn't even gone to trial yet. The article is completely lacking any presumption of innocence. Thanks for having a look. Magnolia677 (talk) 04:11, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Krampus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Geographic. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you TheRedpenOfDoom for editing Bade Achhe Lagte Hain. But I see that you have deleted some information. Before deleting them please give a reason or discuss on the article's talk page and please don't add inappropriate tags. you say that the sources are primary but articles published by national newspapers cannot be considered as primary. If you disagree please consider a third opinion. The article has been edited by Wikipedia's guild of editors, and they have given their approval. Thank you for removing links to blogs or forums. But references to newspaper articles are primary? I strongly disagree. And please let us not argue and avoid edit war. Please let us solve it calmly and get a third opinion. Thank you! --Tamravidhir (talk) 14:45, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Please take it nicely. I think that what the user has said in the Supriya Pathak section in your talk page is correct. Please...don't get so frustrated.--Tamravidhir (talk) 14:57, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

@Tamravidhir: there is no requirement to get approval before removing inappropriate, improperly sourced or unsourced content. There is however a policy that states that you MUST provide a reliably published source before reinserting challenged content. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 21:19, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

But please do not change maintenance tag dates and delete info. That is considered to be vandalism. --Tamravidhir (talk) 10:03, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

I think I have given enough reasons. If this time you be irrational and take it on your ego I may will be forced to take this case up to the Wikiproject boards or get a third opinion.

Hello, TheRedPenOfDoom. You have new messages at Tamravidhir's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Tamravidhir (talk) 14:38, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Tamravidhir (talk) 15:52, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

ANI Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Similarities with Lizard

Check the trailer of creature here and Lizard--Enterths300000 (talk) 13:32, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

You have removed this , but when the year is over and when we will be in mid 2015 then this needs to be added with an updated version--Enterths300000 (talk) 17:12, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Sourcepen

FYI: Sourcepen (talk · contribs), HofKal (talk · contribs) and one or more IP's seem to after you. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 12:27, 19 July 2014 (UTC) User:Baseball Bugs

I am the only user. Check the edits of this Theredpenofdoom. He is abnormally deleting the sourced content.Sourcepen (talk) 12:31, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

I don't know who's in the right as regards the article content. But you're bouncing from account to account, and that's not the right way to do things. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 12:33, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

I had already reported him to AIV, but your evidence is more direct. Note that this began with a post-closing comment at the ANI section with your user ID name. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 12:45, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

The admins seem to be asleep at the switch currently. However, the AIV bot program was smart enough to merge our entries. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 12:48, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

(wakes up) I've blocked Sourcepen. (stumbles off to bed) PhilKnight (talk) 13:15, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

With relation to sourcepen I found he was right about Himmatwala but wrong about Kick 2009 as his edit didn't have a valid link. You have good knowledge about lots of technical issues but , you need to improve your choice of words while editing--Enterths300000 (talk) 16:50, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Dr.Ambedkar's page.

Hello Theredpenofdoom, I reverted one of your changes on Dr.Ambedkar's page. If you think I did something wrong then please discuss it with me. Thanks. Lamazerf (talk) 16:18, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Hello User: TheRedPenOfDoom How are you? Thanks , I welcome your decision on Dr.Ambedkar's page that there should be significant coverage of what is in the lead. But If I add both i.e 1. The lead content 2. The body content. Will it be okay then? There are various sources from which one can edit. Waiting for your early reply. Thanks. Lamazerf (talk) 16:55, 19 July 2014 (UTC)