User talk:TheRedPenOfDoom

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Marvelously trained sea lions & seals, poster for Forepaugh & Sells Brothers, 1899.jpg


Step right up and see a treasury of pinnipeds right before your very eyes!

The next act in only 4 days and 10 edits.

The most ethical show in the big top!

And there is also This archive

Aahil Raza Ibrahim=[edit]

I have again opened the article Aahil Raza Ibrahim as now it has been improved and provided reliable references from newspapers User:Rishika.dhanawade — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rishika.dhanawade (talkcontribs)

link deletion reasoning[edit]

Back in 2013 you deleted several external links from the Sutro Baths page...

One of those links was to this pages:

This is a site I maintain. This page contains more Sutro Baths historical photographs than you will find anywhere, many from my own collection. There are no ads or malicious content. The national park service links to my website for historical information. What was the purpose of your deletion?

gary — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talkcontribs)

Edit request[edit]

Hello!!! TheRedPenOfDoom I have made some recent edits to Karanvir Bohra added and removed some content.Some user thinks that there is lot of irrelevant content in the article. Please can you help improving it.Please can you remove the data you feel is irrelevant. Regards, Rishika.dhanawade (talk) 5:21, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Edit Request[edit]

Hello!!! TheRedPenOfDoom, Thank you for fullfilling my request and improving the article Karanvir Bohra. I also want to make a request to you to remove all the unnecessary trivia from the page Karan Singh Grover.It has too much of unnecessary stuff in the personal life section. Even in the career section things such as the actor being mobbed in public places and being appreciated by costars and colleagues have been added which I feel is inappropriate to be added over there. I had tried removing the content some time ago. But there is some user Durr-e-shehwar who again reverts my edits.Please can you take some steps against improvement of the article.


Rishika.dhanawade (talk) 4:53, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Bigg Boss Halla Bol[edit]

Not worth the time attempting to converse with someone who doesn't even know what bullying is. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 23:39, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

I clearly do not understand why you chose to remove a whole article worth content from Bigg Boss Halla Bol. This is actually an official indian reality show and a derivative of the original franchise and has been constructed keeping in memory the guidelines provided by the Wikipedia Big Brother Project. I am appalled to see that you've shortened the entire cast to just 3 housemates. Therefore I would ask you to read this link which might help confirm the validity of the content you've removed. [1] If you do not understand how these pages work please see the links of similar articles below. If the issue is related to the sources confirming eviction and nominations all of these may be provided via google of any other search engine. I am happy to do it for you if this might aid your understanding.

Links of Big Brother article similar to the one you've edited:

More sources for the Halla Bol page: [2] [3] [4] [5]

--LulzWhateven (talk) 20:31, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

@LulzWhateven: We build our articles upon what reliable third parties have decided to cover about the subject. I removed content for which there was no evidence that third party sources had found worthy of covering. We are not collections of fan trivia.
And yes, most of those other articles needs LOTS of clean up to be appropriate for Wikipedia as well. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 20:46, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
@TheRedPenOfDoom: Firstly I feel Cyphoidbomb's recent edit to the page is very/more constructive. Secondly I understand what you present but my question is: 'Are you going to something about the UK, US + every-other-country versions?' because if you choose to do so you will not only face a heavier opposition but also might be coaxed into reverting what you did to the Bigg Boss page. Everything tabulated in those pages may it be evictions, nominations, statuses or house allotment is an exact replica of the page you chose to specific-discipline. Now you can deny that you are not targeting (read: bullying) a particular article but I do want to be around to find out whether taking this issue up onto an official discussion and trying to actually implement the changes that you vehemently claim can better Wikipedia will appear in your highlights. If you succeed so be it. I will pick up the broomstick before you and cleanup like I mean it. From the UK to the Pinoy, from the Pinoy to the Arabs and from the Arabs to the US. But all in the name of fairness. What's good for the goose is good for the gander. --LulzWhateven (talk) 21:58, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
@LulzWhateven: Accusing me of "bullying" for applying content policies? Strike such nonsense if you wish me to take you halfway seriously and respond to you. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 22:03, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
@TheRedPenOfDoom: Yes, removing the entire content of a specific page without discussing it on the talkpage when you can certainly see that the article is part of the Wikipedia Big Brother Project does make this article feel victimized and cornered. --LulzWhateven (talk) 22:09, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
(talk page stalker) - LulzWhateven, an article cannot be bullied and an article cannot feel. People *can* be bullied, but I would be very selective when pulling the "bullying" card, because these days it is an overused objection, typically for something trivial. "A cop pulled me over, he's BULLYING ME!" Kids sometimes actually kill themselves over real bullying and I don't think we should be trivializing that. You might object to TRPOD's tone, and you might consider the deletions rash, but let's please focus on the edit, rather than getting into the psychoanalysis. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:02, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Sweet baby Jesus...[edit]

...check out the personal life section here. The meme "I can't even" comes to mind. Are you up to the challenge? There could be a wiki kitten in it for you!--Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 23:16, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

It's the Because We Can syndrome. Moriori (talk) 23:19, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Liz stepped in. (Thanks Liz!).--Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 20:24, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Indian cinema - comment requested[edit]

Hi there, this is a form letter. (Aren't you special!) Since you edit around Indian cinema articles, your comments are solicited at this discussion at the Indian cinema task force. The question is: Should box office gross totals be labeled as estimates?

Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:26, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Peace Barnstar Hires.png The Barnstar of Diplomacy
For your continued efforts in making this place a clean one! Vensatry (ping) 07:18, 26 August 2015 (UTC)


Thank your for removing some Un sourced content from DI , though there were references in the article it self about its presence in many countries . You would like to clean up Un sourced/non neutral content from Tablighi Jamat. ScholarM (talk) 06:37, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Phantom 2015 movie[edit]

Please stop removing the MSF paragraph from the movies description. You are very welcome to discuss this issue here: Cintema (talk) 12:51, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Edit war in Phantom movie[edit]

You keep reverting the User:Cintema contribution to Phantom (2015 film). Could you, please, explain what is wrong with the information added? Please reply at Cintema's talk page or (better) in Wikipedia:Help desk#MSF Controversial in 2015 phantom movie. --CiaPan (talk) 13:02, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 29[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Kite-Eating Tree (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Set piece
Mahabharat (2013 TV series) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Panchali

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Dosti Yaariyaan Manmarziyan[edit]

Hi! I have condensed the plot summary as per the note. So I hope you will please stop undoing my edits! Thanks!

Michelledantis (talk) 03:03, 30 August 2015 (UTC)Michelledantis

Association of international and national public organizations “Social protection”[edit]

Breaking all the rules of Wikipedia, You completely rewrote the page. Removed links, templates. Do not engage in vandalism. Your actions will be appealed, and I will ask the administrators to block your actions--Lidaz (talk) 07:33, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Good day! Dear TheRedPenOfDoom ! Please do not engage in vandalism. You completely distorted, copied pages of Eugenia Tymoshenko, The Voice of Peace (Ukraine) and the Association of international and national public organizations “Social protection”. In Your edit you can understand that You have a negative attitude to Tymoshenko. Please don't distort the page and do not break the rules.--Jan777 (talk) 14:49, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Do NOT remove discussion tags such as merge discussions until the discussion is complete. THAT is vandalism!

Stop icon

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.--Jan777 (talk) 14:59, 30 August 2015 (UTC)


Ah, resistance to the Estimation template! From an editor who thought it was okay to copy/paste content from another site, no less... Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:03, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Loham and Premam[edit]

Can you make sense of what's going on there? I added the latter to my watchlist for potential copyvios, and got an unattributed copy-paste today, but there's something on both that perhaps could use a pen of doom. cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 12:14, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Please check your revisions[edit]

Re Sophie Hunter. I am adding a source for her son's name from People which is a reliable source by Wiki standards. I am in no way replacing it with a bad one. What I am removing is a non-notable pregnancy announcement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 01:48, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Names/birthdates of sons/daughters of personalities are encyclopedic[edit]

No rule in Wiki not to add person's son, especially if it's public knowledge and has a reliable source to back it up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 01:50, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Ram Harijan[edit]

Did you notice that 2 days after Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ram Harijan was deleted Late-development syndrome was created? Ram Harijan is now a redirect to it. A search on "Late-development syndrome" psychosomatic turns up nothing. Yes, "Late-development syndrome" is a term used in various ways, but the sources don't seem to relate to Harijan's concept. Doug Weller (talk) 08:54, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Melanie Philips[edit]

Would you mind trying to construct an argument instead of mindlessly undoing my work.

What I wrote is reasonable, sourced and, as far as I can tell, in the right place. If you think this is wrong please open a discussion or amend where you think there are mistakes.

Don't just undo over and over again and tell me to go to talk. You should surely know better... — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 23:34, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

List of Programs Broadcast by Zindagi[edit]

I have explained my position here Talk:List_of_programmes_broadcast_by_Zindagi_TV#Sources_and_attribution. You are being disruptive with your edits on List_of_programmes_broadcast_by_Zindagi_TV. Please believe me when I say that I am not the only person to say so. I would like to provide one sample for your perusal User_talk:Wikimandia#Request_your_feedback_on_the_points_that_I_have_made. Every source that I have provided is attributable.I hope that you will come to see that. I fulfilled my burden of proof according to WP:BURDEN. I WILL seek dispute resolution if these edit wars continue. Manoflogan (talk) 00:13, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

The Unknown known[edit]

I undid most of your edits on the article as I believe most of my entries (in many cases verbatim) reflect the content and perspective of the movie, not commentary. I tried extremely hard to accurately summarize the documentary in the synopsis, nothing more but also nothing less. Please let me know if this was appropriate. If you feel strongly about removing the text, it's no big deal I don't really mind. Plumpy Humperdinkle (talk) 04:45, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

  • Please justify your edits better before you delete a concise and accurate summary of the film. Edits need to be justified -- reactionary undo's turn this place into a battleground. Thanks Plumpy Humperdinkle (talk) 13:32, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
    • @Plumpy Humperdinkle: Justification is right there in the edit summary : removal of claims not verified by reliable sources. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 15:03, 3 September 2015 (UTC)


Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.[edit]


This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The discussion is about the topic List of programmes broadcast by Zindagi TV. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! — TransporterMan (TALK) 14:14, 3 September 2015 (UTC) (DRN volunteer)