User talk:TheRedPenOfDoom

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


And there is also This archive.

Barnstar[edit]

Thx 4 d barnstar :D. WIll do my best to make articles nicer to see and read. Ssven2 (talk


Mammootty[edit]

Dude now check the main lead. Every thing mentioned is sourced and all sources are reliable. please check before reverting. myself cleaned unwanted content.now the article looks perfect. Thanks Harirajmohanhrm talk (talk)‎ 14:40, 26 September 2014 (UTC).

Edit warring noticeboard notice[edit]

WP:ANEW[edit]

Joust[edit]

Why did you remove my added content from the Joust video game article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Widowman88s (talkcontribs)

Please note that the Presidency University, Kolkata page has been vandalised[edit]

Please correct / delete unreferenced comments such as 'Hence all corruptions are tucked away under the cupboard.[3]' The citations are to blogs hosted by specific individuals / interest groups.

Thanks[edit]

Many thanks for cleaning up the errors on the Presidency page. A few still remain but I'm not yet confident enough to make the changes on my own.

AfD notification[edit]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Wilayat_Kirkuk_(ISIL)

Happy New Year![edit]

Fuochi d'artificio.gif

Dear TheRedPenOfDoom,
HAPPY NEW YEAR Hoping 2015 will be a great year for you! Thank you for your contributions!
From a fellow editor,
--FWiW Bzuk (talk)

This message promotes WikiLove. Originally created by Nahnah4 (see "invisible note").

Dual Survival (season 4)[edit]

I noticed you my reverted edit again on that article. I thought I would show you the WP:PROVEIT. I don't care if we wait until the date of the show actually airing to link on the next season page. But I thought I would let you know the first episode of season five is titled "Into The Canyons" and is scheduled to air on January 21, 2015. [1]

Ileana D'Cruz[edit]

Let me edit Ileana D'Cruz

archaya[edit]

I think you forgot to sign your post after mine and before the "hypocritical" comment. FYI. Capitalismojo (talk) 23:25, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

I think you forgot to sign a recent post. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 13:09, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Kaththi[edit]

How do you prove that the website is well established? And how do you know that websites like IBT, Forbes and TOI are 100% reliable? Just asking this as a doubt. If you can give me tips regarding this I shall prove that Telangana Stateinfo is one of the most reliable out there. Otherwise your argument is just baseless!! Please help. User:Richie Gooner (talk) 14:11, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

(talk page stalker)@Richie Gooner: WP:IRS is what you're looking for. — Strongjam (talk) 14:12, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Thank You[edit]

I appreciate the warm welcome. Perhaps we can work together to clean up the article about the GG movement. I am open to any suggestions you may have. Marcos12 (talk) 01:34, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

February 2015[edit]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Ivan J. Parron shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Stifle (talk) 10:30, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Feb 2015[edit]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Ritmoteca.com shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Stephen! Coming... 10:32, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

User Conduct[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is [2] Thank you. — Marcos12 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 21:06, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Arijit Singh[edit]

Can you have a look at my sandbox, where I am re-writing the page Arijit Singh with a similar pattern from articles of international music artists like, Rihanna, Taylor Swift, Shakira and many other, which were considered well written. Can you give a quick feedback on ways to improve it. Thank you!

Mālāsana[edit]

Can you see if Mālāsana is fine in its current version? Yesterday I found some of the recent changes that violate copyrights, [3](copies [4]) - [5] (results: https://tools.wmflabs.org/dupdet/compare.php?url1=https%3A%2F%2Fahimsakasatya.wordpress.com%2F2013%2F11%2F16%2Fmalasana-a-b-garland-pose%2F&url2=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FM%25C4%2581l%25C4%2581sana&minwords=2&minchars=13])

Adavi Kaachina Vennela[edit]

The subject article was PRODed by yourself - it has been restored as a contested PROD. You may wish to consider WP:AfD in the light of this result. Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:17, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Content removed from the Lipman Hearne page[edit]

Can you please explain why my post on the Lipman Hearne page was taken down. You stated that my information was less than neutral, but I felt I was just listing facts about the company. How can I change my post to better align with the terms of wikipedia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sarah.woj (talkcontribs) 21:36, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

David Bergstein[edit]

In regards to your comments regarding David Bergstein, the recent Wiki profile did not speak to Bergstein's career. It spoke to a brief period of litigation initiated by one party -David Molner. David Molner's company, Aramid Entertainment was put into Bankruptcy itself. Aramid lost all of its cases against Bergstein, and Aramid's lawyers were found guilty of fraud and a $50 Million judgement was rendered against them for their role in the fraud perpetrated on Bergstein. The litigation itself, does not define Bergstein. Mr. Bergstein's career spans over 30 years. Many business men and company's currently are and have been involved in litigation, but none of thos instances I have searched on Wikipedia define those persons by their litigation - nor is it even mentioned. Not the case with David Bergstein. Moreover, the articles chosen by "Betty Logan" do not even properly reflect what occurred with Mr. Bergstein. A brief period of concentrated litigation is not a reflection of Mr. Bergstein's 30 year career - which is better summarized by the outline in the Huffington Report that what Betty Logan is attempting to do with Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daspeditor (talkcontribs) 06:39, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Sheldrake tone[edit]

Looks like the Sheldrake discussion has just hit the classic "pah, Wikipedia is an unreliable joke (even though I am editing it)" - although I agree with where you're coming from on the hogwash/eyecandy/tripe stuff and appreciate that you're presumably hoping for a swift, intimidated end to discussion, you're also running the risk of angering people into an edit war, or giving Sheldrake supporters a bright red flag URL to wave at potential meatpuppets on an off-site forum. Everything you've said on that talk page would stand just as strongly with "eyecandy" as "primary-source interpretation of data", etc. --McGeddon (talk) 09:33, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

WP:NPA on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Violence against men (4th nomination)[edit]

RedPen, I appreciate your zeal, but see the policy: "Derogatory comments about other editors may be removed by any editor." Please don't restore--ask an admin in case of doubt. I think TexasAndroid and Bencherlite are awake. Thanks, 207.93.13.145 (talk) 19:56, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Book[edit]

I have stated more reasons why the upcoming book should be mentioned in the Eliezer Yudkowsky article, on its talk page. --Distelfinck (talk) 11:09, 4 March 2015 (UTC)