User talk:TheRedPenOfDoom

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Marvelously trained sea lions & seals, poster for Forepaugh & Sells Brothers, 1899.jpg


Step right up and see a treasury of pinnipeds right before your very eyes!

The next act in only 4 days and 10 edits.

The most ethical show in the big top!

And there is also This archive

Edit Request[edit]

I think the User:Rishika.dhanawade has added some unnecessary content through to Karan Singh Grover. Please can you remove it. Regards., Digvijay411 (talk) 2:54, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Edit request[edit]

Hello!!!!! TheRedPenOfDoom I have made some recent edits to Hera Pheri 3 added and removed some content.There was a lot of irrelevant content in the article. I tried to make some changes as they are being verified by well known bollywood celebrity news website(Pinkvilla and others). After your edit I am guessing you made something wrong and deleted some important lines and stories. Please revert it to it's earlier state. Regards, Jashafi24 (talk) 8:17, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Aahil Raza Ibrahim=[edit]

I have again opened the article Aahil Raza Ibrahim as now it has been improved and provided reliable references from newspapers User:Rishika.dhanawade — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rishika.dhanawade (talkcontribs)

link deletion reasoning[edit]

Back in 2013 you deleted several external links from the Sutro Baths page...

One of those links was to this pages:

This is a site I maintain. This page contains more Sutro Baths historical photographs than you will find anywhere, many from my own collection. There are no ads or malicious content. The national park service links to my website for historical information. What was the purpose of your deletion?

gary — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talkcontribs)

Edit request[edit]

Hello!!! TheRedPenOfDoom I have made some recent edits to Karanvir Bohra added and removed some content.Some user thinks that there is lot of irrelevant content in the article. Please can you help improving it.Please can you remove the data you feel is irrelevant. Regards, Rishika.dhanawade (talk) 5:21, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Edit Request[edit]

Hello!!! TheRedPenOfDoom, Thank you for fullfilling my request and improving the article Karanvir Bohra. I also want to make a request to you to remove all the unnecessary trivia from the page Karan Singh Grover.It has too much of unnecessary stuff in the personal life section. Even in the career section things such as the actor being mobbed in public places and being appreciated by costars and colleagues have been added which I feel is inappropriate to be added over there. I had tried removing the content some time ago. But there is some user Durr-e-shehwar who again reverts my edits.Please can you take some steps against improvement of the article.


Rishika.dhanawade (talk) 4:53, 18 August 2015 (UTC)


Stop iconInformation icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

Forrester Research[edit]

I see you removed a reference to Forrester Research. Isn't it encyclopedic?NSpehler (talk) 2:32, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Poor ref on DeD[edit]

Pen, i clearly understood your point i always have, that's why i never interrupt on the edits of other editors you undid. But in my case i am confident that my content is true and authentic, and is written in a way it should be written. And your concern with the sources, i am removing as less important references as i can. I already deleted refrences that were twice used or according to you is not ok. Tell me you remove my critical reception part, where as strong sources were presented such as Dawn News and Aaaj News, in rating section i used official and authentic Broadcasters' Audience Research Board references and BizAsia an Indian online rating channel for UKs programming. Tell me are these invalid or Crap sources?.

I am not user Sammy.joseph who is new to Wikipedia, i have made series of an article and they are believed to be good and never question. In Pakistan Television Industry media sources are very few who are acclaimed but that doesn't mean they are crap. No matter how much you referred me to Wikipedia policies or rules, i know them very well. I am asking you to believe in my edits and i will try to clean as much CRAP as possible and actually i always have. Fushan007 Talk 9:244, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

A heads up[edit]

You might be interested in this.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:50, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Puff n' fluff[edit]

There is the increasingly popular "spam five references for a single statement" type of promotional puffery at Mahira Khan. Do you have any inclination to take a look?--Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 16:01, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

i had worked on that one a while back and i thought it had been cleaned up, but maintenance is apparently a never ending task! At least there the ref spam seems mostly legit sources - so that is a plus. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 16:11, 1 October 2015 (UTC)


This sock puppet report is....astonishing. Just thought you'd get a giggle or two out of it. Zeke Essiestudy (talk) 09:54, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

mawra hocane[edit]

Hi, I have noticed your speedy has just been removed from the above article by someone, when only advertorials, and a face-book page are being used as references – Oh, and least I forget, association with a famous person (which would make most of us eligible for our own WP article). I think it should be speeded again until the subject becomes notable. This smacks to me of 'paid editor' work. Together with User:Bulova1875 & User:IntrigueBulova

mawra hocane is mentioned on the google entry to:

>< Of course there might be more than one person with this name but the site has photographs of the model.<

Also there is:


As you know, as a PR exercise companies give away free stuff so that it can be seen in the media. Wikipedia:Endorsements#Models It appears prima facie that their is a COI in bumping up the profile of one of their Endorsers above the notability water-level. As well as not declaring COI on articles about this company. Can any WP admin find out were all these IPS are located?--Aspro (talk) 13:57, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

ICTF FAQ[edit]

Hi RP, if you get any extra time, I'd appreciate if you could take a look at User:Cyphoidbomb/ICTF FAQ. I'm trying to put together a list of reliable/unreliable sources for the Indian cinema task force to make enforcing community preferences a little easier. Any help you can provide with adding links to RSN discussions or other discussions would be appreciated, or just fleshing out the various sections would be appreciated. No pressure, however. I was somewhat inspired after seeing editors at MSG-2 The Messenger add some box office values based on really dodgy blogs. Where some sites were estimating ~Rs. 4 crore, these blogs were claiming 100+. Also troubling when yesterday I noted some reviews that suggested very explicitly that the lead actor, a "god man" was paying people to attend screenings and things like that. Very questionable. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:20, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Colors Kannada and Colors (TV channel) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articles Colors Kannada and Colors (TV channel) are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

Both articles will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colors Kannada until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the articles during the discussion, including to improve the articles to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the articles.  --Bejnar (talk) 19:50, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Congressional terms[edit]

I think there's a big misunderstanding regarding the end date of Congressional terms back in the old days. Please see this discussion I started at the Help Desk. By the way, you've done a very nice job on the Tribe article. Czoal (talk) 03:37, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Shilpa Shetty[edit]

There was a change to her birthday left unreverted for how long I don't know, but then there's this series of edits started off by an editor who's been suitably warned, can you take a look and make sense of it please? cheers. I've semi-protected for unreverted BLP vios, but I suspect there are more. —SpacemanSpiff 05:24, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Zubeen Garg[edit]

Could use a second opinion regarding this with respect to WP:BLP and WP:RS. Thanks. Dl2000 (talk) 16:27, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 5[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Brendan Miles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Riding (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

WikiDefender Barnstar Hires.png The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
Time and again I see you working to improve spammy biographies, to remove badly-sourced trivia, to introduce a neutral tone. Thank you, your efforts are appreciated. Huon (talk) 21:10, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Signa Vianen [edit]

I am sorry about the misunderstanding. Clearly I am new to this. Furthermore, the article is not promotional. The facts are there and you even removed links to authentic sources. The subject in that article is Dutch and the data has been online for all involved parties to see. If there had been errors, said parties would have edited those errors. I fail to see why you are so adamant to delete most of the article whereas there is absolutely wrong. I already made a request on the noticeboard, so that editors could keep a close watch after a stalker intentionally started adding crap to the content. And from what I have seen, you edited and then referred to my edits as `crap. It is not at all crap. It is all facts and one does not have to be Dutch to understand such. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LondonTurk (talkcontribs) 22:07, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

To be honest, I am not engaging in any kind of war. I first looked up your ID and it said that you were an illegal editor. From there on I proceeded editing and even adding authentic sources as requested. You removed those. Basically, I fail to see what is the issue. You objected but to what did you object, since you removed authentic sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LondonTurk (talkcontribs) 22:16, 5 October 2015 (UTC)


Hello, TheRedPenOfDoom. I believe that in this edit you describe a living person in potentially defamatory terms. Per WP:BLP, I consider that inappropriate. I am not going to harass you about this; this is going to be my only comment on the issue. I do believe, however, that if you continue to use that kind of language in edit summaries other users will eventually have to address the issue. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 22:27, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Signa Vianen [edit]

You refer to it as being promotional, but it is called describing one´s individual assets. And it has been done often time, right here on Wikipedia. I have come across the strangest content over the years and I truly wonder what is the problem here. I do not see any pictures anywhere, I only see data, actual facts and records. Individuals have their individual track records. Suriname by the way is a third world country with a population under 600.000, it is easily understood that your skepticism originates from whatever cultural background you have. You need not alter the article, the facts were correct. And the dictionary was really the first of its kind, from Dutch to the local dialect and vice versa. This country used to be a Dutch colony and you are clearly unaware of its history. What kind of sources do you need, as you removed a link to visual content as published by a local university. Do you need newspaper articles perhaps or will you delete those too because you won´t understand a word of it as none of it is in English. Do reinstate article in its original form. = — Preceding unsigned comment added by LondonTurk (talkcontribs) 22:29, 5 October 2015 (UTC) Eraser of Stalker Edits 22:41, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

  • I've removed the personal attack. RedPen, I've blocked this user and kept them from editing their talk page. Hopefully you won't receive any more harassment from this person. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 03:55, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Special Barnstar Hires.png The Special Barnstar
For the tireless and thankless job of cleaning and recleaning and cleaning again and recleaning again the articles related to Indian television. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:30, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

S/O Satyamurthy[edit]

First of all, thanks for making your concerns clear. I mentioned about this in the article's history, but to make it clear, i give those refs here itself.

  • failing to return distributor investment and being declared an above average - here which is ref no. 170
  • two consecutive 50 crores - here by Oneindia Entertainment (now Filmibeat) which is ref no 171. DYK was also updated with this fact on 3 August 2015.
  • 7th highest - here by IANS used as ref no. 169 (Here the publisher is India Today whereas the publisher of the article i used in S/O Satyamurthy page was CNN-IBN).

I've provided the answers now, in full detail. Hope these would solve the issues between us. Thanking you. Awaiting your reply, Pavanjandhyala (talk) 11:27, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Would you assist me[edit]

  • Am I wasting my time to improve the articles for the credibilty of the project, and maintenance of the policies? May you assist me, I am wrong?! Notice board are helpless.Justice007 (talk) 12:53, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Sai Pallavi[edit]

I have no view on the nature of the changes you are making to this article but I note that you are currently at 7RR - I advise that you quickly self-revert. RichardOSmith (talk) 14:46, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Your edit to List of programs broadcast by American Broadcasting Company[edit]

While I do agree with your sentiments in this edit that the content is unsourced, your sentiment that the entire section lends undue weight goes against the consensus that was established at WikiProject Television. I just wanted to remind you. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 18:19, 9 October 2015 (UTC)