User talk:Dreadstar: Difference between revisions
→Chunk5Darth: new section |
Chunk5Darth (talk | contribs) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
Hi Dreadstar, when you have time can you please revisit {{user|Chunk5Darth}}? You blocked him back in June for edit warring, and he hasn't changed his ways at all. He's still carrying on regular edit wars; in fact, he's carrying on two separate wars with different users at [[Breaking Bad]] and [[Visa requirements for Israeli citizens]] within the last 24 hours. I would deal with him but I think I've reverted him on Breaking Bad in the past so I'm keeping my distance. --[[User:Spike Wilbury|Spike Wilbury]] ([[User talk:Spike Wilbury|talk]]) 13:44, 23 October 2014 (UTC) |
Hi Dreadstar, when you have time can you please revisit {{user|Chunk5Darth}}? You blocked him back in June for edit warring, and he hasn't changed his ways at all. He's still carrying on regular edit wars; in fact, he's carrying on two separate wars with different users at [[Breaking Bad]] and [[Visa requirements for Israeli citizens]] within the last 24 hours. I would deal with him but I think I've reverted him on Breaking Bad in the past so I'm keeping my distance. --[[User:Spike Wilbury|Spike Wilbury]] ([[User talk:Spike Wilbury|talk]]) 13:44, 23 October 2014 (UTC) |
||
:I've ceased the reverts on Breaking Bad immediately following the warning. |
|||
:However, the other page is a completely different issue: the other user has been reinserting information which I found irrelevant, proved its irrelevance on the article talk page, but the other user refuses to engage in said discussion on the article talk page and has done '''nothing''' but revert and threaten me. Please explain how I am in the wrong. Thanks. [[User:Chunk5Darth|Chunk5Darth]] ([[User talk:Chunk5Darth|talk]]) 18:06, 23 October 2014 (UTC) |
|||
:*Here is the above mentioned [[Talk:Visa requirements for Israeli citizens#Belarus|talk page discussion]], and the utterly ignored [[User talk:Chunk5Darth#September 2014|response on my talk page]]. [[User:Chunk5Darth|Chunk5Darth]] ([[User talk:Chunk5Darth|talk]]) 18:28, 23 October 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:30, 23 October 2014
This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
|
Archives and sandboxesDefender
Award!
RL Barnstar
Holy wow. Good job, Dreadstar. --Fang Aili talk | |||||||||||||||
New comments below this section
The abuse continues
Shortly before you visited the Talk:Gamergate_controversy article and after my previous request TheRedPenOfDoom made open attacks against living person Milo Yiannopoulos. As I was chastised for voicing my suspicions against WP:F, I feel this too will warrant a formal notice.--ArmyLine (talk) 05:48, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
- Due to RL, I've had no time to look at WP, hopefully I'll have some time this coming week. Dreadstar ☥ 01:17, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
- Er, bullshit. All he said was that Milo is becoming too close to the gamergate stuff and is losing his objectivity on the matter. That is mild bordering on the milquetoast. Disagree if you like, but WP:BLP policy protects subjects from actual defamatory attacks and slurs and the like, it does not inoculate the subject from every last critical observation. Tarc (talk) 21:43, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
- The mainstream response to B/Y is pretty much "yawn, nothing there", "hmmm, some presentation out of context -not exactly what you would expect from a journalist purportedly expounding on journalistic ethics" to "yowsa! can you believe he is blaming the victims of the death threats????? " I am not really sure how you wan to fit that into the article. Note: this is referring to Milo. I would think that saying "yowsa! can you believe he is blaming the victims of the death threats" (not an actual quotation) is patently defamatory and has no place on an encyclopedia. I'm mainly posting this for Dreadstar's convenience and have no interest in starting an argument here. I suggest you contact an admin in a new thread if you are concerned about my statements or discuss it on my talk page. I am willing to listen to what you have to say and will not screen out fair concerns.--ArmyLine (talk) 03:10, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
- Er, bullshit. All he said was that Milo is becoming too close to the gamergate stuff and is losing his objectivity on the matter. That is mild bordering on the milquetoast. Disagree if you like, but WP:BLP policy protects subjects from actual defamatory attacks and slurs and the like, it does not inoculate the subject from every last critical observation. Tarc (talk) 21:43, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
Chunk5Darth
Hi Dreadstar, when you have time can you please revisit Chunk5Darth (talk · contribs)? You blocked him back in June for edit warring, and he hasn't changed his ways at all. He's still carrying on regular edit wars; in fact, he's carrying on two separate wars with different users at Breaking Bad and Visa requirements for Israeli citizens within the last 24 hours. I would deal with him but I think I've reverted him on Breaking Bad in the past so I'm keeping my distance. --Spike Wilbury (talk) 13:44, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
- I've ceased the reverts on Breaking Bad immediately following the warning.
- However, the other page is a completely different issue: the other user has been reinserting information which I found irrelevant, proved its irrelevance on the article talk page, but the other user refuses to engage in said discussion on the article talk page and has done nothing but revert and threaten me. Please explain how I am in the wrong. Thanks. Chunk5Darth (talk) 18:06, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
- Here is the above mentioned talk page discussion, and the utterly ignored response on my talk page. Chunk5Darth (talk) 18:28, 23 October 2014 (UTC)