Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justin Capră (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
cmt
I put colons in links-to-categories in a message by User:Cavarrone, to show category links instead of putting this talk page in those categories. Sorry.
Line 62: Line 62:
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF4F00;">'''{{resize|96%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.}}'''</span><br />
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF4F00;">'''{{resize|96%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.}}'''</span><br />
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Mr. Guye|Mr. Guye]] ([[User talk:Mr. Guye|talk]]) 02:31, 12 February 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Justin Capră (2nd nomination)]]</div>
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Mr. Guye|Mr. Guye]] ([[User talk:Mr. Guye|talk]]) 02:31, 12 February 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Justin Capră (2nd nomination)]]</div>
* '''Keep''' I don't care a bit if Capră is a hoaxer or not, FYI WP is full of articles about hoaxs and hoaxers, eg take a look at categories [[Category:Impostors|Impostors]] and [[Category:Hoaxes in science|Hoaxes in science]]. The subject has obviously received multiple reliable coverage, and valid sourcing includes the already cited chapter in the Steve Lehto's book ''The Great American Jet Pack: The Quest for the Ultimate Individual Lift Device'' which not just rebuts Capră's claims but is also itself a significant secondary reliable source about the subject. [[WP:UGLY]] is not a reason for deletion, and I suggest the editors who complain about the current state of the article to edit the article and to improve it as they see fit, they're welcome. [[User:Cavarrone|'''C'''avarrone]] 07:49, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
* '''Keep''' I don't care a bit if Capră is a hoaxer or not, FYI WP is full of articles about hoaxs and hoaxers, eg take a look at categories [[:Category:Impostors|Impostors]] and [[:Category:Hoaxes in science|Hoaxes in science]]. The subject has obviously received multiple reliable coverage, and valid sourcing includes the already cited chapter in the Steve Lehto's book ''The Great American Jet Pack: The Quest for the Ultimate Individual Lift Device'' which not just rebuts Capră's claims but is also itself a significant secondary reliable source about the subject. [[WP:UGLY]] is not a reason for deletion, and I suggest the editors who complain about the current state of the article to edit the article and to improve it as they see fit, they're welcome. [[User:Cavarrone|'''C'''avarrone]] 07:49, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:49, 12 February 2015

Justin Capră (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E 15:01, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E 15:01, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E 15:02, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete for a number of reasons:
    • The sourcing doesn't justify an article. We have one AP obituary (for whatever reason quoted from various news outlets), one interview in Adevărul, and a bunch of cruft.
    • His achievements don't justify keeping the article, either. As far as I can tell, everything he did aside from the jet pack is fluff. As to the jet pack itself, well, there's actually a book on jet packs from Chicago Review Press, which addresses Capră in a chapter called "origin hoaxes". Quote: "as with his jet pack, there was no evidence shown to prove that any of his unconventional flying machines ever actually got off the ground. Capră eventually gave numerous interviews to newspapers and magazines in Romania and many articles have appeared there about the Romanian inventor of the jet pack.... Capră's claim of inventing the jet pack was widely believed in Romania, though nowhere else". And I think that says it, in a nutshell. He was an amateur inventor, and later a determined self-promoter, who dabbled into something like a jet pack, but didn't actually invent one, but his claims resonated in a country that loves to think it's responsible for various major inventions, and doubly so once he took on the line that "the Americans" stole his idea.
    • The text is so chaotic that WP:DYNAMITE deserves to apply in any case.
  • As an alternative, we might perhaps consider a redirect to Jet_pack#Justin_Capr.C4.83.27s_flying_backpack, but that too ought to be thoroughly revamped in accordance with reliable claims made in reliable sources, rather than boosterism. - Biruitorul Talk 18:15, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep This article was approved by user User:Racklever to not be removed because it has refs:

20:27, 21 January 2015‎ User:Racklever (-60)‎ . . (Article has refs so "speedy deletion" removed)

  • Keep -- Contested deletion --

This page should not be deleted because Justin Capra is a legend between Romanian engineers. Some peoples contest the value of his work but the fact that he build outstanding engineering equipment in a very dark age of Communism from Romania means a lot to many people. He must be known to English readers as well. 09:33, 21 January 2015‎ User:94.177.32.154

Eminescus (talk) 21:51, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ref list reformatted:-

      • 1) More from the Lehto book: "Romanian National Geographic published an article in 2011 stating that Capra had been awarded a patent on July 8, 1958, but they did not make any claims about whether he ever built or flew the device he patented."
      • 2) That Lehto is an attorney, or that he starts out with certain assumptions (which most authors do, by the way), is not especially relevant. That he has no Wikipedia article is entirely irrelevant. What is relevant is that his book is published by a reputable publisher and has undergone standard editorial review.
      • 3) As Lehto notes, "There is no question that Capra built two jet-pack-like devices". So that's not at issue. But not every tinkerer is notable, and as I've indicated, what we have about him at jet pack is more than ample.
      • 4) With all due respect, being the subject of an exhibit at the Prahova County Natural Sciences Museum does not advance a claim of independent notability.
      • 5) Please note that the article that begins "A Romanian inventor who claimed he beat the Americans to make the world's first jetpack" is an AP report, reproduced verbatim in various press outlets. It's dishonest to claim that constitutes multiple sources. - Biruitorul Talk 01:42, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 12:35, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mr. Guye (talk) 02:31, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep I don't care a bit if Capră is a hoaxer or not, FYI WP is full of articles about hoaxs and hoaxers, eg take a look at categories Impostors and Hoaxes in science. The subject has obviously received multiple reliable coverage, and valid sourcing includes the already cited chapter in the Steve Lehto's book The Great American Jet Pack: The Quest for the Ultimate Individual Lift Device which not just rebuts Capră's claims but is also itself a significant secondary reliable source about the subject. WP:UGLY is not a reason for deletion, and I suggest the editors who complain about the current state of the article to edit the article and to improve it as they see fit, they're welcome. Cavarrone 07:49, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]