Wikipedia:Featured article review/1996 United States campaign finance controversy/archive3: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
SandyGeorgia (talk | contribs) |
Nikkimaria (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
*'''Delist'''. Single sentence paragraphs; inconsistent citation formatting; dead links. [[User:DrKiernan|DrKiernan]] ([[User talk:DrKiernan|talk]]) 17:32, 13 April 2015 (UTC) |
*'''Delist'''. Single sentence paragraphs; inconsistent citation formatting; dead links. [[User:DrKiernan|DrKiernan]] ([[User talk:DrKiernan|talk]]) 17:32, 13 April 2015 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delist'''. [[User:SandyGeorgia|'''Sandy'''<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 21:04, 14 April 2015 (UTC) |
*'''Delist'''. [[User:SandyGeorgia|'''Sandy'''<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 21:04, 14 April 2015 (UTC) |
||
{{FARClosed|delisted}} [[User:Nikkimaria|Nikkimaria]] ([[User talk:Nikkimaria|talk]]) 05:01, 24 April 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 05:01, 24 April 2015
1996 United States campaign finance controversy
1996 United States campaign finance controversy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Featured article review/1996 United States campaign finance controversy
- Featured article review/1996 United States campaign finance controversy/archive1
- Featured article review/1996 United States campaign finance controversy/archive2
- Featured article review/1996 United States campaign finance controversy/archive3
Toolbox |
---|
- Notified: Main contributor retired since 2008, WP USA, WP Politics
- URFA nom
Review section
This is a 2006 promotion which no longer meets standards, as explained on talk in December 2014. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 00:44, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
FARC section
- Issues raised with this article include BLP, coverage, and prose. Nikkimaria (talk) 05:25, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delist - This article is not up to modern standards. There are many issues, some of which I outlined on the talk page as linked above. Among the most problematic are the inadequate lead (a mere 5 sentences long) and the lack of any thread to tie the sections together into a cohesive narrative. Maralia (talk) 23:49, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delist. Single sentence paragraphs; inconsistent citation formatting; dead links. DrKiernan (talk) 17:32, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delist. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 21:04, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
- Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Nikkimaria (talk) 05:01, 24 April 2015 (UTC)