Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Lodge (ice hockey): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 14:33, 10 June 2015

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 02:53, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

James Lodge (ice hockey)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable per WP:NHOCKEY as he hasn't played in a top-level professional league. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 18:28, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is no reason to delete the article for James Lodge. He has signed an entry level contract with the Winnipeg Jets of the National Hockey League. WpgJets4Life (talk) 19:35, 3 June 2015 (UTC)WpgJets4Life[reply]

Lots and lots of players sign contracts with major teams and never play a single NHL game. That is why we have the standard of WP:NHOCKEY which clearly states that they must've actually played for a team in a top-level league. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 20:24, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:58, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:58, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:58, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:59, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: as failing NHOCKEY, with no evidence the subject meets the GNG. I'm also nominating four other articles created by WpgJets4Life that likewise are mid-level prospects who fail NHOCKEY and with only routine sports coverage debarred by WP:ROUTINE to show. (Three other articles passed NHOCKEY.) I urge WpgJets4Life to read WP:GNG and WP:NHOCKEY for a better understanding of the criteria for notability for potential articles. Ravenswing 21:54, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable minor hockey player who fails to meet WP:NHOCKEY or WP:GNG. Can be recreated when/if he achieves notability. -DJSasso (talk) 17:57, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No evidence of notability. Fails WP:HOCKEY. Ashbeckjonathan (talk) 00:28, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 26: / Line 26: @@
 {{clear}}
 :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>
-*'''Delete''' - fails every BLP criterion we have and {{U|WpgJets4Life}}'s remark is obviously just a fan comment and nt oin any way based on Wikipedia notability guidelines. --[[User:Kudpung|Kudpung กุดผึ้ง]] ([[User talk:Kudpung|talk]]) 03:56, 10 June 2015 (UTC)