User talk:Borntodeal: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Final warning: Using Wikipedia for advertising or promotion on Kathy Ireland . (TW) |
Borntodeal (talk | contribs) Move this to the page's discussion |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
[[User:Calliopejen1|Calliopejen1]] ([[User talk:Calliopejen1|talk]]) 21:18, 18 June 2015 (UTC)</div><!--Template:Afc talk--> |
[[User:Calliopejen1|Calliopejen1]] ([[User talk:Calliopejen1|talk]]) 21:18, 18 June 2015 (UTC)</div><!--Template:Afc talk--> |
||
:I accepted this article because I don't like to be the judge, jury, and executioner in borderline cases, and I thought it required further input. As for why it is nominated for deletion, you can read my explanation at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Sterling Winters Company |the nomination page]]: "This company does not appear to be notable. There are a variety of mentions in the media, but never any substantive discussion about the company. Overall, the sourcing is extremely thin." You can see the relevant notability policies at [[WP:GNG]] and [[WP:CORP]]. If you can improve the sourcing by adding articles that ''contain substantive discussion about the company'' (rather than mere mentions), please do. Note that adding additional poor-quality sources is unlikely to sway other users in favor of retaining the article. [[User:Calliopejen1|Calliopejen1]] ([[User talk:Calliopejen1|talk]]) 21:37, 18 June 2015 (UTC) |
:I accepted this article because I don't like to be the judge, jury, and executioner in borderline cases, and I thought it required further input. As for why it is nominated for deletion, you can read my explanation at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Sterling Winters Company |the nomination page]]: "This company does not appear to be notable. There are a variety of mentions in the media, but never any substantive discussion about the company. Overall, the sourcing is extremely thin." You can see the relevant notability policies at [[WP:GNG]] and [[WP:CORP]]. If you can improve the sourcing by adding articles that ''contain substantive discussion about the company'' (rather than mere mentions), please do. Note that adding additional poor-quality sources is unlikely to sway other users in favor of retaining the article. [[User:Calliopejen1|Calliopejen1]] ([[User talk:Calliopejen1|talk]]) 21:37, 18 June 2015 (UTC) |
||
== June 2015 == |
|||
[[File:Information orange.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to [[:Kathy Ireland]]. While [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|objective prose]] about beliefs, products or services ''is'' acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a soapbox|a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion]]. Thank you.[[Category:User talk pages with Uw-advert2 notices|{{PAGENAME}}]]<!-- Template:uw-advert2 --> [[User:NeilN|<b style="color:navy">Neil<span style="color:red">N</span></b>]] <sup>[[User talk:NeilN|<i style="color:blue">talk to me</i>]]</sup> 00:47, 24 June 2015 (UTC) |
|||
Reminder of our terms of use: |
|||
The Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use require paid editors to disclose their employer, client and affiliation: |
|||
{{quote box |
|||
|border=1px |
|||
|title=Paid contributions without disclosure |
|||
|title_fnt=#555555 |
|||
|halign=left |
|||
|quote= |
|||
<blockquote>These Terms of Use prohibit engaging in deceptive activities, including misrepresentation of affiliation, impersonation, and fraud. As part of these obligations, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. You must make that disclosure in at least one of the following ways: |
|||
*a statement on your user page, |
|||
*a statement on the talk page accompanying any paid contributions, or |
|||
*a statement in the edit summary accompanying any paid contributions. |
|||
Applicable law, or community and Foundation policies and guidelines, such as those addressing conflicts of interest, may further limit paid contributions or require more detailed disclosure.</blockquote> |
|||
|fontsize=100% |
|||
|bgcolor=#F9F9F9 |
|||
|bordercolor=#ccc |
|||
|width=70% |
|||
|align=center |
|||
|quoted= |
|||
|salign=center |
|||
|style=margin–top:1.0em;margin-bottom:1.0em;padding:1.0em}} |
|||
--[[User:NeilN|<b style="color:navy">Neil<span style="color:red">N</span></b>]] <sup>[[User talk:NeilN|<i style="color:blue">talk to me</i>]]</sup> 00:53, 24 June 2015 (UTC) |
|||
[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|alt=Stop icon]] You may be '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]] without further warning''' the next time you [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a soapbox|use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising]], as you did at [[:Kathy Ireland]]. [[Category:User talk pages with Uw-advert4 notices|{{PAGENAME}}]]<!-- Template:uw-advert4 --> [[User:NeilN|<b style="color:navy">Neil<span style="color:red">N</span></b>]] <sup>[[User talk:NeilN|<i style="color:blue">talk to me</i>]]</sup> 01:06, 24 June 2015 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 01:08, 24 June 2015
Your submission at Articles for creation: The Sterling Winters Company has been accepted
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:18, 18 June 2015 (UTC)- I accepted this article because I don't like to be the judge, jury, and executioner in borderline cases, and I thought it required further input. As for why it is nominated for deletion, you can read my explanation at the nomination page: "This company does not appear to be notable. There are a variety of mentions in the media, but never any substantive discussion about the company. Overall, the sourcing is extremely thin." You can see the relevant notability policies at WP:GNG and WP:CORP. If you can improve the sourcing by adding articles that contain substantive discussion about the company (rather than mere mentions), please do. Note that adding additional poor-quality sources is unlikely to sway other users in favor of retaining the article. Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:37, 18 June 2015 (UTC)