Talk:Wiradjuri: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edits by 203.54.9.127 (talk) to last version by AYArktos
→‎Semi-protection: clarify ongoing reversions
Line 42: Line 42:


Any comments about the semiprotection should be directed to the [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/203.54.*.*|relevant Request for Comment]].--[[User:AYArktos|A&nbsp;Y&nbsp;Arktos]]\<sup>[[User_talk:AYArktos|talk]]</sup> 21:00, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
Any comments about the semiprotection should be directed to the [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/203.54.*.*|relevant Request for Comment]].--[[User:AYArktos|A&nbsp;Y&nbsp;Arktos]]\<sup>[[User_talk:AYArktos|talk]]</sup> 21:00, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

*Just to clarify, I am reverting comments made by editors who are breaching blocks. The comments are unsigned and could be reverted for that reason alone. My intentions are set out at [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/203.54.%2A.%2A#Statement of AYArktos.27 intended ongoing reponse to this editor]]--[[User:AYArktos|A&nbsp;Y&nbsp;Arktos]]\<sup>[[User_talk:AYArktos|talk]]</sup> 02:23, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:23, 3 August 2006

WikiProject iconAustralia Start‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconWiradjuri is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Note icon
Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia.
Note icon
The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to help@wikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.


Changes

I've attempted make some changes in order to ensure the page uses non-racist language, partially capitalization of 'Aboriginal' and have made use of 'Aboriginal people' rather than 'Aborigines'. I also removed the reference to alcohol contributing to the decline in population. Not denying is was a contributing factor, I just want to find a citation before putting it back in. Fizban 14:21, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reversions of edits made by 203.54.186.83

Name meaning

As inappropriate as the manner in which this anon has contested the meaning of "Wiradjuri" is, I have to agree with him/her that it probably does not mean "people of the three rivers". Most peoples in the area are named after their word for "no" (e.g. Kamilaroi word for "no" is "kamil"). The Wiradjuri word for "no" happens to be wirrai, which confirms my suspicion. --Ptcamn 14:42, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ptcamn, what is your ref for: "The Wiradjuri word for "no" happens to be wirrai..."??

Mathews, R. H. (1904). "The Wiradyuri and Other Languages of New South Wales". The Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland. 34: 284–305. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
The spelling wirai is given by Günther, James (1892). "Grammar and Vocabulary of the Aboriginal dialect called Wirradhuri". In Fraser, John (ed.). An Australian Language. Sydney: Government printer. pp. 56–120 of appendix. --Ptcamn 06:20, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

TY, TY Ptcamm. It seems there is some sense here. I think it was Howitt (or was it Prof Elkin, I'm not sure I have all their publications and papers here but lazy) waxed on re the No thing and justified it, but culturally it means other than that also. Tindale isnt really an authority apart on renaming stuff and recoding stuff, then obscuring it. The stuff he hid isnt too bad re its veracity, but the stuff he published I'd take with a huge grain of salt.

Elkin, Tindale or Howitt werent around 10 kya ago to say "These people are now named the Wiradjuri" so the sound (of the word) origin needs to be traced. I dounbt if Tindale had anything to do with the three rivers thingy. Morelike, Peter Kabiala or someone like that. Have you ever noticed a lot of location name supposedly mean 'quiet place by the river'. That is what gets told to people if they get too nosey and they go publish it. When some go wanting cultural info, they get told something, they go away happy, the real info is protected and all are happy. It works well I think. By the time anyone gets to knowing what words mean from their own cognitive ability, they know to not publish some words, so also join the 'quiet place by a river' brigade.

  • No problem, cite your source. The source, for the present meaning is I think Norman Tindale who is quite possibly mistaken but definitely an authority. There are no doubt more up to date sources. As of this morning the link to the Tindale page referenced in the article is down. However, the NSW National Parks and Wildlife service gives Wiradjuri means 'people of the three rivers', these rivers being the Macquarie, Lachlan and Murrumbidgee [1] and they are citing a printed publication: Heritage Office (HO) and Department of Urban Affairs and Planning (DUAP) 1996. Regional Histories: Regional Histories of New South Wales. Sydney. --A Y Arktos\talk 21:00, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I can't find a source specifically saying that Wiradjuri is derived from "no", unfortunately, but this comes close:
Fraser, John (1892). An Australian Language... Sydney: Government printer. Of these tribes, the Kamalarai, Walarai, Ngaiamba, Bakanji, Wiradhari, the Associated Tribes, the Ngarego, the Kuringgai, are named already established and in use; and most of them are formed from the local word for 'no,' and thus describe more the speech than the people.
--Ptcamn 06:20, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Wiradjuri Words http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Wiradjuri-Words.jpg -- RobertM 08:05, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection

I have semiprotected this articles as per the discussion at Talk:Gundagai, New South Wales:

I will similarly semi-protect any related articles if I notice any abusive edits being carried out from the same IP range - abusive edits refers to the tone of the edit summary as well as the actual edit itself.
All editors should be aware of Wikipedia policies and guidelines, specifically: No original research, Verifiability, No personal attacks, Civility and Etiquette. Any editors breaching any of the policies will be blocked and their contributions reverted.
Recommencing editing in less than the block period is a breach of the Blocking policy.
All editors have also been put on notice that comments on talk pages should be signed. Unsigned comments may be reverted.

Any comments about the semiprotection should be directed to the relevant Request for Comment.--A Y Arktos\talk 21:00, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]