Jump to content

User talk:173.197.107.20: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
NeilN (talk | contribs)
Line 12: Line 12:
: also, note I am unable to respond [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template_talk:California_wildfires&diff=prev&oldid=677809782 here]. [[Special:Contributions/173.197.107.20|173.197.107.20]] ([[User talk:173.197.107.20#top|talk]]) 17:29, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
: also, note I am unable to respond [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template_talk:California_wildfires&diff=prev&oldid=677809782 here]. [[Special:Contributions/173.197.107.20|173.197.107.20]] ([[User talk:173.197.107.20#top|talk]]) 17:29, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
: [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AZackmann08&type=revision&diff=677808210&oldid=677806526 not sure why non-IP editors] are asked to undo the last revert, while IP editors are simply blocked. [[Special:Contributions/173.197.107.20|173.197.107.20]] ([[User talk:173.197.107.20#top|talk]]) 17:31, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
: [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AZackmann08&type=revision&diff=677808210&oldid=677806526 not sure why non-IP editors] are asked to undo the last revert, while IP editors are simply blocked. [[Special:Contributions/173.197.107.20|173.197.107.20]] ([[User talk:173.197.107.20#top|talk]]) 17:31, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
::If you are going to hand out [[WP:3RR]] warnings then I assume you know what edit warring is. "An edit or a series of consecutive edits that undoes other editors' actions—whether in whole or in part—counts as a revert." So you did your fourth revert, and then handed out a [[WP:3RR]] warning. That's straight up [[WP:GAMING]]. --[[User:NeilN|<b style="color:navy">Neil<span style="color:red">N</span></b>]] <sup>[[User talk:NeilN|<i style="color:blue">talk to me</i>]]</sup> 17:42, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:42, 25 August 2015

August 2015

Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  NeilN talk to me 17:06, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

You were obviously aware of WP:3RR before you were warned. --NeilN talk to me 17:08, 25 August 2015 (UTC) [reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

173.197.107.20 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have not violated any WP:3RR, and I have been discussing the issues with the template on the template talk page. How am I to continue this discussion if I have been blocked? 173.197.107.20 (talk) 17:09, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I have not violated any [[WP:3RR]], and I have been discussing the issues with the template on the template talk page. How am I to continue this discussion if I have been blocked? [[Special:Contributions/173.197.107.20|173.197.107.20]] ([[User talk:173.197.107.20#top|talk]]) 17:09, 25 August 2015 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I have not violated any [[WP:3RR]], and I have been discussing the issues with the template on the template talk page. How am I to continue this discussion if I have been blocked? [[Special:Contributions/173.197.107.20|173.197.107.20]] ([[User talk:173.197.107.20#top|talk]]) 17:09, 25 August 2015 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I have not violated any [[WP:3RR]], and I have been discussing the issues with the template on the template talk page. How am I to continue this discussion if I have been blocked? [[Special:Contributions/173.197.107.20|173.197.107.20]] ([[User talk:173.197.107.20#top|talk]]) 17:09, 25 August 2015 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Four reverts on Template:California wildfires. --NeilN talk to me 17:18, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:NeilN, I only reverted 3 times there, and started the discussion on the talk page. the first was an edit, not a revert. the other editor reverted 4 times. 173.197.107.20 (talk) 17:28, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
also, note I am unable to respond here. 173.197.107.20 (talk) 17:29, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
not sure why non-IP editors are asked to undo the last revert, while IP editors are simply blocked. 173.197.107.20 (talk) 17:31, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If you are going to hand out WP:3RR warnings then I assume you know what edit warring is. "An edit or a series of consecutive edits that undoes other editors' actions—whether in whole or in part—counts as a revert." So you did your fourth revert, and then handed out a WP:3RR warning. That's straight up WP:GAMING. --NeilN talk to me 17:42, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]