Jump to content

CHC Helikopter Service Flight 241: Difference between revisions

Coordinates: 60°27′8″N 4°55′49″E / 60.45222°N 4.93028°E / 60.45222; 4.93028
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Investigation: minor twks
Investigation: added new update
Line 69: Line 69:


On 27 May the AIBN released an update to the preliminary investigation report where they confirmed that scenarios under consideration included failure of epicyclic module, suspension bar (lift strut) attachment and MGB (gearbox) conical housing.<ref name=PrelReport_upd1>{{cite news |url=http://www.aibn.no/About-us/Nyhetsarkiv/The-Helicopter-Accident-Updated-preliminary-report|title=The Helicopter Accident: Updated preliminary report |publisher=Statens Havarikommisjon for Transport |date=27 May 2016 |accessdate=27 May 2016}}</ref> On the same day Airbus Helicopters updated their press release bulletin and stated that in their opinion only failure of the attachment of a suspension bar could be assessed as probable based on the information available by that date. <ref name=AirbusPR/>
On 27 May the AIBN released an update to the preliminary investigation report where they confirmed that scenarios under consideration included failure of epicyclic module, suspension bar (lift strut) attachment and MGB (gearbox) conical housing.<ref name=PrelReport_upd1>{{cite news |url=http://www.aibn.no/About-us/Nyhetsarkiv/The-Helicopter-Accident-Updated-preliminary-report|title=The Helicopter Accident: Updated preliminary report |publisher=Statens Havarikommisjon for Transport |date=27 May 2016 |accessdate=27 May 2016}}</ref> On the same day Airbus Helicopters updated their press release bulletin and stated that in their opinion only failure of the attachment of a suspension bar could be assessed as probable based on the information available by that date. <ref name=AirbusPR/>

On 1 June the AIBN released an update to the preliminary investigation report including an urgent safety recommendation to the European Safety Agency (EASA). The recommendation was based on metallurgical examinations where signs of fatigue in parts of the second stage planet gear were found.<ref name=PrelReport_upd2>{{cite news |url=http://www.aibn.no/About-us/Nyhetsarkiv/The-Helicopter-Accident-New-preliminary-report|title=The Helicopter Accident: New preliminary report |publisher=Statens Havarikommisjon for Transport |date=27 May 2016 |accessdate=27 May 2016}}</ref>


==See also==
==See also==

Revision as of 19:04, 1 June 2016

2016 Turøy helicopter crash
A Eurocopter EC225LP Super Puma, similar to the one that crashed
Accident
Date29 April 2016
SummaryInvestigation results pending, rotor failure reported
SiteSkitholmen, Øygarden, Hordaland, Norway
60°27′8″N 4°55′49″E / 60.45222°N 4.93028°E / 60.45222; 4.93028
Aircraft typeEurocopter EC225LP Super Puma
OperatorCHC Helikopter Service
RegistrationLN-OJF
Flight originFlesland Airport, Bergen, Norway
StopoverGullfaks B platform, North Sea
DestinationFlesland Airport, Bergen, Norway
Passengers11
Crew2
Fatalities13 (all)
Survivors0

On 29 April 2016, a CHC Helikopter Service Eurocopter EC225 Super Puma helicopter, carrying oil workers from the Gullfaks B platform in the North Sea, crashed near Turøy, a Norwegian coastal island 36 kilometres (22 mi) from the city of Bergen. Several witnesses reported initially seeing nothing untoward with the helicopter flying steadily, before the sound suddenly changed and it started to sway. A moment later its main rotor assembly detached from the aircraft and the fuselage plummeted to the ground and exploded into flames.[1][2]

All thirteen crew and passengers died in the crash.[3]

Aircraft

The accident aircraft was an EC225LP Super Puma helicopter, manufactured by Eurocopter (now named Airbus Helicopters), registration LN-OJF.[4][5]

Background

At 10:05 local time (UTC+2), HKS241 took off from Bergen's Flesland Airport, five minutes behind schedule. It arrived at the Gullfaks B platform on time and departed at 11:16, carrying two pilots and eleven passengers, employees and subcontractors of Norwegian oil company Statoil.[6] It was scheduled to land back at Flesland Airport at 12:08.[1]

Crash

At 11:53, as the helicopter approached Sotra off the coast of Bergen, several witnesses observed the flight, stating that nothing was out of the ordinary until the sound suddenly changed and the helicopter started to sway. Moments later the main rotor assembly of the helicopter detached, causing a sudden drop in speed and altitude, as confirmed by flight telemetry. With all control lost, it crashed on the islet of Skitholmen between the islands of Turøy and Toftøy at 11:54:35 local time and exploded on impact.[2] Most of the wreckage then slid off the islet into the sea. A video recording of the detached main rotors spinning to earth was made shortly afterwards.[6] The rotor came to rest several hundred metres away on the island of Toftøy. According to flight tracking data, the time between the detachment of the rotor and the crash itself was only eleven seconds, with the helicopter diving 640 metres (2,100 ft) in that time.[2]

Response

At 11:55, local police received reports of a helicopter crash. Six minutes later, at 12:01, this was relayed to the national rescue service. Rescue workers, police and fire fighters arrived at the scene at 12:20, and the wreckage was located partially submerged soon after. At 13:15, authorities confirmed that the wreckage had been found, and that they did not expect to find survivors.[2]

Shortly after the accident oil companies and helicopter operators voluntarily grounded similar helicopters until further notice,[7] except for aircraft being used for search and rescue purposes.[8] This was later followed by a grounding by the Civil Aviation Authority of Norway, specified to public transport flights and commercial air transport operations with EC225LP helicopters.[9] Later that day the British Civil Aviation Authority issued a Safety Directive which grounded all EC 225LP helicopters on the United Kingdom Civil Aircraft Register, or flying in United Kingdom airspace, except for aircraft being used for search and rescue purposes.[10][11] On 30 April, Airbus Helicopters issued a Safety Information Notice expressing their support of the decision to put all commercial passenger flights with Super Puma helicopters of model EC225LP "on hold". Other versions of the Super Puma were not included in this decision.[12]

On 1 May Airbus Helicopters stated in a press release that "Considering the additional information gathered during the last 48 hours, Airbus Helicopters’ decision, at this stage, is to not suspend flights of any nature for the EC225LP". They did not specify the nature of the additional information leading to this decision.[13]

On 11 May the Norwegian Civil Aviation Authority and the UK Civil Aviation Authority jointly agreed to extended the grounding, now also including Super Puma helicopters of model AS332L2.[14][15] The decision was based on similarities between the two helicopter models.

Norwegian Prime Minister Erna Solberg described the crash as "horrible". King Harald V and Queen Sonja cancelled a visit to Sweden[4] that was to have marked King Carl XVI Gustaf's 70th birthday.

Crew and passengers

On its final flight the aircraft was carrying eleven passengers and two pilots.[16] Authorities confirmed that eleven of the people on board were Norwegian, with one British passenger and one Italian crew member. The eleven passengers were employees of six different companies: Halliburton (four employees); Aker Solutions (three); and one employee each of Statoil, Schlumberger, Welltec and no. On 2 May the names of all the crash victims were released.[17]

Investigation

The Norwegian Accident Investigation Board (AIBN) is responsible for investigating aviation accidents in Norway.[18] The British Air Accidents Investigation Branch (AAIB) and French Bureau d'Enquêtes et d'Analyses pour la Sécurité de l'Aviation Civile (BEA) each dispatched a team of investigators to Norway to assist the AIBN in its investigation. Representatives from Airbus Helicopters and engine manufacturer Turbomeca were part of the BEA team.[19][20]

The aircraft's combined cockpit voice recorder (CVR) and flight data recorder (FDR) was sent to the AAIB in the United Kingdom for data retrieval.[21] Data were successfully downloaded on 1 May and sent back to the AIBN which confirmed that the received data were of good quality and useful for further investigation.[22]

On 1 May, the BBC reported that the helicopter had been forced to land on 26 April, over fears of a technical problem after a cockpit warning light had illuminated a few minutes into a flight.[23]

In a press conference on 3 May, the AIBN stated that the initial investigation and analysis of data from the combined FDR and CVR convinced them that pilot error could be ruled out and that there were no indications of any malfunction until one second before the end of the recording, which they assumed was the moment when the rotor detached.[24][25] An AIBN spokesman said the accident was down to a technical fault and "not an accident caused by human error".[26] Later that day Airbus Helicopters updated their press release bulletin with a request for verification of the correct installation of all main gearbox suspension bar attachments for the EC225LP. They also stated that "similar measures will be published shortly for the EC725AP in a specific ASB" (Alert Service Bulletin).[13]

On 13 May the AIBN released a preliminary investigation report containing a brief update on the progress and findings two weeks into the investigation. The report did not contain any conclusions or recommendations.[27]

On 27 May the AIBN released an update to the preliminary investigation report where they confirmed that scenarios under consideration included failure of epicyclic module, suspension bar (lift strut) attachment and MGB (gearbox) conical housing.[28] On the same day Airbus Helicopters updated their press release bulletin and stated that in their opinion only failure of the attachment of a suspension bar could be assessed as probable based on the information available by that date. [13]

On 1 June the AIBN released an update to the preliminary investigation report including an urgent safety recommendation to the European Safety Agency (EASA). The recommendation was based on metallurgical examinations where signs of fatigue in parts of the second stage planet gear were found.[29]

See also

References

  1. ^ a b "Helikopterstyrt i Hordaland – 13 bekreftet omkommet". Verdens Gang (in Norwegian). 29 April 2016. Retrieved 29 April 2016. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |trans_title= ignored (|trans-title= suggested) (help)
  2. ^ a b c d Lura, Christian; Bolstad, Jon; Njåstad, Marthe; Nave, Ingvild (29 April 2016). "Politiet: Alle 13 er trolig omkommet" (in Norwegian). NRK. Retrieved 29 April 2016. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |trans_title= ignored (|trans-title= suggested) (help)
  3. ^ Pryser Libell, Henrik; Karasz, Palko (29 April 2016). "Helicopter Crashes Off Norway, Leaving No Signs of Survivors". The New York Times. Retrieved 29 April 2016.
  4. ^ a b "Norway helicopter crash: 13 killed near Bergen". BBC News Online. Retrieved 29 April 2016.
  5. ^ "Photo of LN-OJF". Jetphotos.net. Retrieved 6 May 2016.
  6. ^ a b "La hélice del helicóptero que se estrelló en Noruega se desprendió en vuelo". El País (in Spanish). 30 April 2016. Retrieved 1 May 2016. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |trans_title= ignored (|trans-title= suggested) (help)
  7. ^ "Eni Norge stanser helikoptertrafikk" (in Norwegian). NRK. 29 April 2016. Retrieved 4 May 2016. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |trans_title= ignored (|trans-title= suggested) (help)
  8. ^ "Norway, UK suspend H225 operations following crash". Flight International. 30 April 2016. Retrieved 1 May 2016.
  9. ^ "The Norwegian CAA issues Safety Directive on EC225LP". Luftfartstilsynet. 29 April 2016. Retrieved 4 May 2016.
  10. ^ "UK Super Pumas grounded after Norway crash leaves 13 dead". Independent Television News. Retrieved 29 April 2016.
  11. ^ "Safety Directive Number: SD–2016/001" (PDF). Civil Aviation Authority. Retrieved 29 April 2016.
  12. ^ "Safety Information Notice No. 3030-S-00" (PDF). Airbus Helicopters. 30 April 2016. Retrieved 1 May 2016.
  13. ^ a b c "ACCIDENT IN NORWAY". Airbus Helicopters. 27 May 2016. Retrieved 28 May 2016.
  14. ^ "Safety and operational directive No. 16/05616-5" (PDF). Luftfartstilsynet. 11 May 2016. Retrieved 11 May 2016.
  15. ^ "Offshore helicopter restrictions extended". Civil Aviation Authority (United Kingdom). 11 May 2016. Retrieved 11 May 2016.
  16. ^ Malm, Sara; Gordon, Amie (29 April 2016). "Norway helicopter crash kills 11 people including Briton". Daily Mail. Associated Press. Retrieved 29 April 2016.
  17. ^ "Dette er de omkomne" (in Norwegian). nrk.no. 30 April 2016. Retrieved 30 April 2016. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |trans_title= ignored (|trans-title= suggested) (help)
  18. ^ "Aviation". Accident Investigation Board Norway. Retrieved 29 April 2016.
  19. ^ "The AAIB is deploying a small team to assist the Norwegian AIBN". Air Accidents Investigation Branch. Retrieved 29 April 2016.
  20. ^ "The Helicopter Accident: The work continues". Statens Havarikommisjon for Transport. Retrieved 1 May 2016.
  21. ^ "Helikopterulykken: Havarikommisjonen har startet arbeidet på ulykkesstedet" (in Norwegian). Statens Havarikommisjon for Transport. Retrieved 29 April 2016. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |trans_title= ignored (|trans-title= suggested) (help)
  22. ^ "The Helicopter Accident: Data from the combined FDR and CVR retrieved. Data is of good quality". Statens Havarikommisjon for Transport. 2 May 2016. Retrieved 2 May 2016.
  23. ^ "Super Puma crash: Helicopter 'showed warning light'". Bbc.co.uk. 1 May 2016. Retrieved 1 May 2016.
  24. ^ "Fatal helicopter crash off Norway due technical error: investigators". Reuters. 3 May 2016. Retrieved 3 May 2016.
  25. ^ "Rotoren forsvant på et sekund" (in Norwegian). Bergens Tidende. 3 May 2016. Retrieved 3 May 2016. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |trans_title= ignored (|trans-title= suggested) (help)
  26. ^ "Fatal helicopter crash 'caused by technical fault'". STV. 3 May 2016. Retrieved 3 May 2016.
  27. ^ "The Helicopter Accident: Preliminary report". Statens Havarikommisjon for Transport. 13 May 2016. Retrieved 13 May 2016.
  28. ^ "The Helicopter Accident: Updated preliminary report". Statens Havarikommisjon for Transport. 27 May 2016. Retrieved 27 May 2016.
  29. ^ "The Helicopter Accident: New preliminary report". Statens Havarikommisjon for Transport. 27 May 2016. Retrieved 27 May 2016.