User talk:MaxSem: Difference between revisions
→Psthomas: replied on your talk page |
→Psthomas: new section |
||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
If the block is now reverted or not, I don't want my username misused and I hope this privilege would be respected as a wikipedia user and as an editor who have previously attempted to contribute to the project.(but didn't understand or were aware of the policies in its whole sense) This is not any attempt to evade blocks, this is the only way I know to communicate given the situation. |
If the block is now reverted or not, I don't want my username misused and I hope this privilege would be respected as a wikipedia user and as an editor who have previously attempted to contribute to the project.(but didn't understand or were aware of the policies in its whole sense) This is not any attempt to evade blocks, this is the only way I know to communicate given the situation. |
||
:Replied on [[User talk:Psthomas|your talk page]]. [[User:MaxSem|Max Semenik]] ([[User talk:MaxSem#top|talk]]) 05:05, 11 June 2016 (UTC) |
:Replied on [[User talk:Psthomas|your talk page]]. [[User:MaxSem|Max Semenik]] ([[User talk:MaxSem#top|talk]]) 05:05, 11 June 2016 (UTC) |
||
== Psthomas == |
|||
Just letting you know that the IPsocking has continued since the block and as recently as a few hours ago [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Edit_filter/False_positives/Reports&diff=724663875&oldid=724663570 there's the claim of not knowing Psthomas]. —[[User:SpacemanSpiff|<font color="#BA181F">Spaceman</font>]]'''[[User_talk:SpacemanSpiff|<font color="#2B18BA">Spiff</font>]]''' 05:08, 11 June 2016 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 05:08, 11 June 2016
I left some comments for you on this ticket.--v/r - TP 07:27, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- Danke! Max Semenik (talk) 15:33, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Templestaykorea block discussion notification
This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Unblock request rejected based on dubious reasoning". Thank you.
Psthomas
We have talked before, then you said to contact after 6 months. I only remembered it after seeing a notification this morning through mail about me being mentioned in an article in which i was involved previously with tag reverts. It's been a year now and currently I would like to ask you as an admin to prevent use of my username in any wiki-articles, without permission and to not use at all it in any negative sense. I feel I deserve this privilege.
I would also like to request for revoking my block.
Reasoning
Looking back one thing I know is that I wasn't familiar with policies and was only starting to understand what an admin is then. If I remember it correctly, after reverting the tag my articles was targeted for deletions without specific answers, most of them looked like policing and I felt it as bullying and felt strongly to stand against it. Now I know it wasn't bullying but following policies, this wasn't mentioned then or taken the time to explain clearly. Though I am clear from the memory of the incident that skilled editors could have spotted all the signs of a newbie and someone who didn't know what bite is to mention it. What I can ascertain is that I wouldn't go for complete article creation now and would follow related policies. Though I am a person who can make mistakes, but if policies cited honestly any mistakes from my part would be cleared. For matters I didn't understand then I cant truly apologize, but I can be careful in the future.
If the block is now reverted or not, I don't want my username misused and I hope this privilege would be respected as a wikipedia user and as an editor who have previously attempted to contribute to the project.(but didn't understand or were aware of the policies in its whole sense) This is not any attempt to evade blocks, this is the only way I know to communicate given the situation.
- Replied on your talk page. Max Semenik (talk) 05:05, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
Psthomas
Just letting you know that the IPsocking has continued since the block and as recently as a few hours ago there's the claim of not knowing Psthomas. —SpacemanSpiff 05:08, 11 June 2016 (UTC)