User talk:Doc9871

1RR

Your recent editing history at Donald Trump shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

The article is under a 1RR restriction. You have now made 3 reverts in just a couple of minutes. Please self-revert.Volunteer Marek (talk) 08:16, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Hang on. If I "self-revert", wouldn't that get me in some sort of trouble?! You can't just add blogs as RS's just because you think you know what a RS is. You have no business passing off your edits in the Trump realm as unbiased. It's a joke. Doc talk 08:19, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Self-reverts fall under WP:3RRNO, but, I don't think that was the point you were trying to get across. Mr rnddude (talk) 08:48, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

WP:AE

[1] Volunteer Marek (talk) 09:07, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

You actually think "Shut up. Signed: everybody" is a "very explicit personal attack". Your opinion is really not of any use to me. Please move along. Doc talk 09:35, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

And your little request for "a two week block from editing as well as a topic ban from anything related to Donald Trump and the ongoing presidential election, broadly construed"? Pathetic and not going to happen. Doc talk 09:54, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

August 2016

Telling a constructive editor to shut up (or indeed "Shut. Up.") is offensive. Claiming that you speak for "everybody" in doing so is ridiculous, as well as being even more offensive.[2] If you think avoiding calling Volunteer Marek actual names means you're not personally attacking him, you're mistaken. I agree with him that you're personally attacking him. And I'm glad to see you have received a discretionary sanctions alert. If you persist in your aggressive personalized posting on article talk (or elsewhere, for that matter), you may be topic banned from Donald Trump-related pages. Bishonen | talk 10:37, 1 August 2016 (UTC).

It is not a personal attack to tell an editor to "shut up". Period. End of story. Doc talk 10:40, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

You're looking to settle the score, Bish. You are absolutely biased against me and should truly have no part in the AE. I couldn't even name a handful of admins that want to get me more than you. Really sad. Doc talk 10:50, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Actually, I hadn't realized that some of your worst talkpage posts[3][4] were made after the discretionary sanctions alert that you removed so swiftly (if you didn't give yourself time to read it, that's your problem). You have been topic banned, please see below. Bishonen | talk 11:05, 1 August 2016 (UTC).

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction

The following sanction now applies to you:

Topic banned for one month from all Donald Trump-related pages.

You have been sanctioned for persistent aggressive and personalising editing of Talk:Donald Trump

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics 2#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. Bishonen | talk 11:05, 1 August 2016 (UTC)