User talk:169.253.4.21

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks.

---

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. 18:13, 12 July 2005 (UTC)

---

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Deemo 21:00, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

Reason for revert

I am reverting your deletion of a sentence in Nuclear reprocessing because the consensus seems to be that the sentence is correct and you didn't give any reason for the deletion. Please use the Discussion page, and edit that. If you can show us that our perceptions are incorrect, we'll be happy to modify the article. Simesa 18:04, 27 September 2005 (UTC)

Source for edit to Münster Rebellion article

Can you give a source for this edit to the Münster Rebellion article. It may be accurate that his genitals were nailed to the city gate, but given the history of edits coming from this IP address, it'd be good to have a source for the claim cited as well.

Thanks, mennonot 15:31, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

Quotes

Howdy. I appreciate your effort to clean up Bigfoot; however, please note that Wikipedia style conventions state to put punctuation on the outside of quote marks unless it's a part of the quote. That is, use

"Example",

not

"Example,"

Thanks! android79 21:23, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

Ollanta Humala

I reverted most of your edits for a reason. Many of them seemed POV. I pretty much built up the entire page (with help from two other users) and thus have a special interest in it. Do not just go around replacing your edits. I added "See Talk Page" in the page history for a reason not just so that you can ignore it.-Jersey Devil 22:24, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

Wilson Bridge

If what you said is the case, why don't you be bold and change it? SchuminWeb (Talk) 23:05, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Your edit to E. Pierce Marshall

Your recent edit to E. Pierce Marshall (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 18:42, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

Your edit to Flatlander

Your recent edit to Flatlander (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 16:04, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

George Allen

Please refrain from falsely labeling other user's edits as "vandalism" and interact civilly with other editors. The source you cited purporting to prove that Allen is Jewish cites Wikipedia as one of its sources. Its usefulness as a source is thus somewhat doubtful under WP:RS. If you want to discuss Allen's supposed ancestry further, I recommend posting at Talk:George Felix Allen. Thanks. · j e r s y k o talk · 20:40, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

I deleted nothing to "save face," in fact, I moved the comment to Talk:George Felix Allen, where even more editors will see it. Please comment there if you choose. · j e r s y k o talk · 21:02, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

You may want to consider if it is appropriate to be using a State Department computer[1] to make your Wikipedia edits. If nothing else, you should probably create an account and use it to avoid broadcasting where you are editing from. --StuffOfInterest 21:15, 6 September 2006 (UTC)