User talk:Zefr: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
c |
←Blanked the page |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Reconciliation == |
|||
I can't imagine that you aren't aware of the fact that a medical review is not a primary source for information that it cites, so I think it's fairly safe to assume that there's a non-policy related reason that motivates you to remove content that is cited to some of these sources. If you actually talk to me instead of simply revert my edits or remove other content cited to such sources based upon an irrelevant policy justification, I'd probably be willing to seek a middle ground with you and revise what is written in a manner that's acceptable to both of us. However, since I generally have no clue what the real reason is as to why you're removing material in most cases, I don't know how to begin to go about revising article content so that it's mutually acceptable to us. |
|||
The only thing of which I'm aware that you don't like is the use of medical reviews that cite ''in vitro'' evidence or animal studies and make a claim that applies to humans to support a medical claim in an article about humans ''in vivo''. As a general rule, I agree that this is bad ''unless'' it is made very clear in the article text that this claim is based upon an extrapolation which may not necessarily be valid/relevant to living humans. However, in some of our past interactions, you've removed medical claims about humans ''in vivo'' which is cited to reviews of multiple clinical trials on humans. In the instances that you did this, it really irritated me because I didn't understand ''why'' you did this - you simply used a clearly irrelevant policy justification for removing content (e.g., "it [i.e., the source] is primary"). As an example, I know that you're opposed to the current article text in [[3-hydroxyisovaleric acid#Medical]], but I don't understand why or know which statements in that section that you take issue with. |
|||
If you're willing to talk to me and explain why you feel that the text in that section <s>and the [[Niacin#Research]] section</s> (edit: your most recent revision to that section is fine with me) is problematic, ''I am willing'' to revise the content in both of these articles and adjust how I write content in the future in order to reconcile our issues with one another. [[User:Seppi333|'''<font color="#32CD32">Seppi</font>''<font color="Black">333</font>''''']] ([[User Talk:Seppi333|Insert '''2¢''']]) 21:06, 12 October 2016 (UTC) |
|||