Jump to content

User talk:Barthateslisa: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎DRN: new section
arbitration enforcement sanction
Line 14: Line 14:


Hello, Barthateslisa, hope you are back. When you get a chance, please add your statement at the DRN case on Shah Mir. Cheers, [[User:Kautilya3|Kautilya3]] ([[User talk:Kautilya3|talk]]) 16:35, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Barthateslisa, hope you are back. When you get a chance, please add your statement at the DRN case on Shah Mir. Cheers, [[User:Kautilya3|Kautilya3]] ([[User talk:Kautilya3|talk]]) 16:35, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

==Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction==
{{Ivmbox
|2=Commons-emblem-hand.svg
|imagesize=50px
|1=The following sanction now applies to you:

{{Talkquote|1=You have been banned for three months from the topics of social groups and religion (either separately or together) in relation to India, Pakistan and Afghanistan, as well as any policy or actions related to these topics. Please read [[WP:TBAN]] to see what a topic ban is.}}

You have been sanctioned for disruptive editing, including persistent edit warring and battleground editing

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an [[Wikipedia:Administrators#Involved admins|uninvolved administrator]] under the authority of the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]]'s decision at [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan#Final decision]] and, if applicable, the procedure described at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions]]. This sanction has been recorded in the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions/Log/2016|log of sanctions]]. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the [[Wikipedia:Banning policy|banning policy]] to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Appeals and modifications|here]]. I recommend that you use the [[Template:Arbitration enforcement appeal#Usage|arbitration enforcement appeals template]] if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard.&nbsp;Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you.<!-- Template:AE sanction.--> [[User:Bishonen|Bishonen]] &#124; [[User talk:Bishonen|talk]] 11:54, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
}}

Revision as of 11:55, 10 December 2016

The Purple Barnstar
All the best for standing against all odds. Marvellous Spider-Man 17:25, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring, as you did at Ranvir Sena. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  —SpacemanSpiff 13:53, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DRN

Hello, Barthateslisa, hope you are back. When you get a chance, please add your statement at the DRN case on Shah Mir. Cheers, Kautilya3 (talk) 16:35, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction

The following sanction now applies to you:

You have been banned for three months from the topics of social groups and religion (either separately or together) in relation to India, Pakistan and Afghanistan, as well as any policy or actions related to these topics. Please read WP:TBAN to see what a topic ban is.

You have been sanctioned for disruptive editing, including persistent edit warring and battleground editing

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. Bishonen | talk 11:54, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]