User talk:Snowded

Manual Archive pages
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
Archive to 29 May 08 Archive to 21 July 08 Archive to 30 Nov 08 Archive to 03 Mar 09 Archive to 18 Oct 09 User talk:Snowded/Autoarchive 16 User talk:Snowded/Autoarchive 23 latest

• notes and working

Nomination of White Student Unions for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article White Student Unions is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/White Student Unions until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

The Signpost: 22 December 2016

• Year in review: Looking back on 2016

• News and notes: Strategic planning update; English ArbCom election results

• Special report: German ArbCom implodes

• In focus: Active user page filter prevents vandalism and harassment

• Op-ed: Operation successful, patient dead: Outreach workshops in Namibia

• In the media: In brief: Coverage of gender gap initiatives, banner fundraising, and more

• Featured content: The Christmas edition

• Technology report: Labs improvements impact 2016 Tool Labs survey results

• Traffic report: Post-election traffic blues

• Blog: Wiki Loves Monuments contest winners announced

• Recent research: One study and several abstracts

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:04, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Your revert over at Reid Technique

I believe you have been caught up in a dispute which is complicated by an inappropriate refactoring done on the talk page. Causing you to misjudge when you performed this edit. If you view this diff, you will see the change was made with consensus. It was just complicated when the page was refactored by inappropriate moving comments between different sections, and them being collapsed. I appreciate your consideration on this matter. TiggerJay (talk) 07:01, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

OK I reverted but if GM wants to change it back .... ----Snowded ^TALK 07:05, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Thank you! TiggerJay (talk) 08:07, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Knowledge Management

Thank you. Excuse me, I am a novice on Wikipedia. I shall see if I can find relevant cited material and will get back to you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Neilpw1 (talk • contribs) 15:31, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

I doubt you will but good luck! ----Snowded ^TALK 15:37, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Notice of Neutral point of view noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Quality posts here (talk) 00:12, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Cute

I've been expecting your revert and your somewhat petty provocative-natured revert here (WP:BAIT), again providing an invalid argument to your revert, so I reverted you. However, I do not indent to revert your invalid reverts again since I have no use with dealing with trolls anymore. If you really cared about keeping the article in order, then maybe you should have considered the talk page or a third party after our past experience.. It's funny how you got blocked for edit warring after you kept mouthing me with Wikipedia policies on edit warring while I've made an improvement to stay away from the revert button. You should really live up to your sense making persona. Anyways, good luck and laugh at your effort to link any flaw of mine. (N0n3up (talk) 06:45, 16 January 2017 (UTC))