Talk:Paul Staines: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 18:18, 17 September 2006

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Paul.staines (talk · contribs) / Staines, Paul Staines, Paul

Move to Paul Staines?

It looks as though this article is going to be more about Paul Staines than his pseudonym, Guido Fawkes. I propose creating a Paul Staines article and moving this page to it. Alan Pascoe 16:17, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Citations needed under Early life and education

I got these facts from Altered State : The Story of Ecstasy Culture and Acid House, as this is a link to Amazon and you can search inside the book (using the search term 'Staines'). But I can't work out how to cite this reference. I will come back to it in due course, but if anyone can help that would be great!) Skandha ji 15:37, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Source of Lawyer's Letter

The information about the Nevis company is cited here - does anyone know where this letter is from? As a blind link, how reliable is it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.189.123.235 (talk • contribs)

Not very, I've removed it. I've left the text in, apart from the statement about Nevis. The rest of the information appears in the footer of the Guido Fawkes blog. Alan Pascoe 14:11, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have reinserted the reference to Nevis with improved sources. DWaterson 17:28, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Guido Fawkes

The redirect is inappropriate. Guido is much better known than Staines. 147.114.226.174 09:33, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment from the Subject

It is not my intention to amend this article in any way.

Assertions are being made without any evidence beyond hearsay and the scribblings of journalists whom I have never met or spoken with.

I am a private person and am increasingly bemused by what is taken for fact. I hold no public office, no position in a public company and no position on a board or a public body of any kind whatsoever. Just because something is written elsewhere does not make it a fact. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Paul.staines (talk • contribs) 18:25, 17 September 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Paul, feel free to edit your own article if you wish, this is no longer a taboo given the current revision of Wikipedia policy on biographies of living persons. If there is a comment which you contend is untrue, and in the article it is either unsourced or the source is wrong, then correct it. Personally, I can't see anything terribly controversial or unbalanced myself at the moment, whether it be from the 'scribblings of journalists' or not, however... Whilst you may be right in stating you are a private individual with no official role, you undoubtedly are notable in Wikipedia's terms as the author of one of Britain's top-ranking blogs. If you'd prefer that this article be located at Guido Fawkes rather than under your own name, I assume people would be happy to consider that request. DWaterson 18:18, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{WPBiography|living=yes|class=|importance=}}
+{{Notable Wikipedian|Paul.staines|Staines, Paul}}
 == Move to Paul Staines? ==
@@ Line 26: / Line 27: @@
 Assertions are being made without any evidence beyond hearsay and the scribblings of journalists whom I have never met or spoken with.
-I am a private person and am increasingly bemused by what is taken for fact.  I hold no public office, no position in a public company and no position on a board or a public body of any kind whatsoever.  Just because something is written elsewhere does not make it a fact.
+I am a private person and am increasingly bemused by what is taken for fact.  I hold no public office, no position in a public company and no position on a board or a public body of any kind whatsoever.  Just because something is written elsewhere does not make it a fact. <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by [[User:Paul.staines|Paul.staines]] ([[User talk:Paul.staines|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Paul.staines|contribs]]) 18:25, 17 September 2006 (UTC).</small>
+:Paul, feel free to edit your own article if you wish, this is no longer a taboo given the current revision of [[WP:BLP|Wikipedia policy on biographies of living persons]]. If there is a comment which you contend is untrue, and in the article it is either unsourced or the source is wrong, then correct it. Personally, I can't see anything terribly controversial or unbalanced myself at the moment, whether it be from the 'scribblings of journalists' or not, however... Whilst you may be right in stating you are a private individual with no official role, you undoubtedly are [[WP:N|notable]] in Wikipedia's terms as the author of one of Britain's top-ranking blogs. If you'd prefer that this article be located at [[Guido Fawkes]] rather than under your own name, I assume people would be happy to consider that request. [[User:DWaterson|DWaterson]] 18:18, 17 September 2006 (UTC)