Jump to content

User talk:Suzanne Olsson: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Behavior?: missing the point
NeilN (talk | contribs)
You have been blocked from editing for abusing multiple accounts. (TW)
Line 14: Line 14:


:::Missing the point. You can only edit two Talk pages. Full stop. Anywhere else, including the Fringe Theory/Noticeboard ([[WP:FTN]]) as you did today, is a violation of that ban. If you ever want to be reinstated, quit whinging and start suggesting specific improvements to the one article you can influence, without any mention of other editors. [[User:Agricolae|Agricolae]] ([[User talk:Agricolae|talk]]) 23:27, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
:::Missing the point. You can only edit two Talk pages. Full stop. Anywhere else, including the Fringe Theory/Noticeboard ([[WP:FTN]]) as you did today, is a violation of that ban. If you ever want to be reinstated, quit whinging and start suggesting specific improvements to the one article you can influence, without any mention of other editors. [[User:Agricolae|Agricolae]] ([[User talk:Agricolae|talk]]) 23:27, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

== April 2017 ==
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[File:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]] You have been '''[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''2 weeks''' for [[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry|abusing multiple accounts]]. Note that multiple accounts are [[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry#Legitimate uses|allowed]], but '''not for ''[[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry#Inappropriate uses of alternative accounts|illegitimate]]'' reasons''', and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#G5|may be reverted or deleted]]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[WP:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may [[WP:Appealing a block|request an unblock]] by first reading the [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}. &nbsp;[[User:NeilN|<b style="color:navy">Neil<span style="color:red">N</span></b>]] <sup>[[User talk:NeilN|<i style="color:blue">talk to me</i>]]</sup> 05:03, 11 April 2017 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-sockblock -->

Revision as of 05:03, 11 April 2017

Reminder of your topic ban

I'm not suggesting you've broken it or forgotten it, but it applies to this account also: "SuzanneOlsson (talk · contribs)'s topic ban is extended to include all pages on Wikipedia, with the exception of User talk:SuzanneOlsson. Suzanne Olsson is, however, allowed to make comments regarding her biography on Talk:Suzanne M. Olsson and on WP:BLPN. Salvio Let's talk about it! 13:03, 13 May2013 (UTC) I'll consider it as allowing you to comment where you are commenting, Talk:Suzanne Olsson Doug Weller talk 16:49, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have broken your topic ban by posting at WP:FTN

This sort of behavior is part of what got you into trouble before. Not me. Doug Weller talk 20:38, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Behavior?

Mr. Weller- I haven't broken any bans that I'm aware of! What are you talking about?. I am following Wiki rules and getting messages of encouragement from Wiki- welcoming me back as an editor. I was advised by other wiki editors where to go and what to do. Suzanne Olsson (talk) 21:01, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

On 19 February 2013, User:SuzanneOlsson was issued a topic ban that covered "all Roza Bal related article edits, broadly construed".[1] Subsequently, on 13 May 2013, this ban was extended to encompass all of Wikipedia, except for two pages, User talk:SuzanneOlsson and Talk:Suzanne M. Olsson.[2] You have now switched to a different User name, which you are allowed to do, so long as you quit using the old one entirely, but there should be a notice on your new User page that you are the same editor as the now-inactive old one. However, this does not absolve you of the ban. At the same time, Talk:Suzanne M. Olsson has been deleted, but it seems reasonable to view Talk:Suzanne Olsson as its effective successor. That means, taking the common-sense interpretation of the ban, that you are only allowed to edit only Talk:Suzanne Olsson and User talk:Suzanne Olsson (this page). Thus User:Doug Weller is accurately characterizing your edit to the Fringe Theory/Noticeboard WP:FTN as a violation of this ban. If you think the ban should no longer apply, then you can petition to have revoked but your postings today are exactly the sort that got you banned to begin with, as far as I can tell from the record, so it will be difficult to make a persuasive case for reinstatement. Until/unless that happens, your activities on Wikipedia are narrowly delimited, and do not include FTN. I have made a note there suggesting that any subsequent relevant discussion takes place where you can participate. Agricolae (talk) 22:02, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Agricolae, I am aware what happened several years ago. It was Doug Weller at that time who insisted on banning me and reverting the page to what we now have. I have no idea what FTN stands for. I was browsing Wiki, trying different links to find out what page I should post on to get help from other more impartial editors. It is not about me editing wiki pages- it is about me asking other editors for help with one page. Suzanne Olsson (talk) 22:44, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Missing the point. You can only edit two Talk pages. Full stop. Anywhere else, including the Fringe Theory/Noticeboard (WP:FTN) as you did today, is a violation of that ban. If you ever want to be reinstated, quit whinging and start suggesting specific improvements to the one article you can influence, without any mention of other editors. Agricolae (talk) 23:27, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NeilN talk to me 05:03, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]