Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2017 NRLB Championship: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Relisting discussion (XFDcloser) |
Format log date |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|G}} |
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|G}} |
||
:{{la|2017 NRLB Championship}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2017 NRLB Championship|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 May |
:{{la|2017 NRLB Championship}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2017 NRLB Championship|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 May 21#{{anchorencode:2017 NRLB Championship}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/2017_NRLB_Championship Stats]</span>) |
||
:({{Find sources AFD|2017 NRLB Championship}}) |
:({{Find sources AFD|2017 NRLB Championship}}) |
||
A contested prod. This competition season is unlikely to meet GNG or other notability criteria, of the three sources presented, two seem to be duplicates of each other. [[User:Mattlore|Mattlore]] ([[User talk:Mattlore|talk]]) 10:39, 13 May 2017 (UTC) |
A contested prod. This competition season is unlikely to meet GNG or other notability criteria, of the three sources presented, two seem to be duplicates of each other. [[User:Mattlore|Mattlore]] ([[User talk:Mattlore|talk]]) 10:39, 13 May 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:11, 21 May 2017
- 2017 NRLB Championship (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A contested prod. This competition season is unlikely to meet GNG or other notability criteria, of the three sources presented, two seem to be duplicates of each other. Mattlore (talk) 10:39, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
- Weak keep as it covers a season in Dutch Rugby League's top division, but it does need improving with more sources IMHO. Skemcraig (talk) 16:39, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep - per the contested prod. Would take issue were player articles to be created, but a season of the top-level of the sport in a country surely must be something that is contended when put up for deletion.Fleets (talk) 08:16, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete or Redirect to Dutch Rugby League Competition. There doesn't seem to be enough coverage to justify the creation of articles for individual seasons, but I'd be ok with grouping them together in the main competition article per WP:NSEASONS. J Mo 101 (talk) 12:49, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep - The highest tier of domestic rugby league in one country deserves the accreditation and recognition. References have now also been added to each match as found on the website link, http://www.rugbyleague.nl/index.php/competitie#uitslagen — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.155.68.6 (talk) 08:22, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:11, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:11, 21 May 2017 (UTC)