User talk:Gregorof: Difference between revisions
Victoriagirl (talk | contribs) BC |
Betacommand (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
== BC == |
== BC == |
||
Thanks for the warm greeting. Actually, I go to McGill (but have more friends at Concordia - which probably meansd something). [[User:Victoriagirl|Victoriagirl]] 23:01, 10 October 2006 (UTC) |
Thanks for the warm greeting. Actually, I go to McGill (but have more friends at Concordia - which probably meansd something). [[User:Victoriagirl|Victoriagirl]] 23:01, 10 October 2006 (UTC) |
||
== Welcome to [[User:AmiDaniel/VandalProof|VandalProof!]] == |
|||
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Gregorof! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply [[User:AmiDaniel/VandalProof|download and install VandalProof from our main page]]. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other [[User:AmiDaniel/VandalProof#Moderators|moderator]], or you can post a message on [[User:AmiDaniel/VP/Discuss|the discussion page]]. [[User:Betacommand|Betacommand]] <sup>([[User talk:Betacommand|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Betacommand|contribs]] • [[User:BetacommandBot|Bot]])</sup> 20:34, 11 October 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:34, 11 October 2006
VandalProof
Thank you for applying to VandalProof. However, due to possible abuse of the program, new users with fewer than 250 mainspace edits, users who have recently been involved in edit wars, and users with a history of vandalism are generally not accepted. Since you currently only have 35 mainspace edits, your application has been declined. Even so, please don't take this personally and feel free to apply again when you meet the above mentioned requirements.--TBCTaLk?!? 07:59, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
Image deleted
I deleted the image because it had been tagged for speedy deletion due to its licence. It had been tagged as for use in 'non-commercial and educational' aims. However, this does not qualify the image for free use on Wikipedia and it was deleted by me. I apologise; whoever tagged the article as incorectly licensed should have notified you.
If you want, I can restore the article and you can tag it with {{GFDL-self}} --Robdurbar 18:31, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
- Ah, I see that you've reuploaded it anyway with the correct licnece. If you use this in future, then you shouldn't have any difficulties. Thank you! --Robdurbar 18:33, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
- No worries, sorry if I sounded a little harsh earlier I was just confused. Do I have to tag it with {{GFDL-self}} though? What I am getting at is that I would prefer not to completely release it to the public domain, but instead just for 'non-commercial and educational' means. However if this is not possible, I am defintely willing to completely release it. Also, if it is not inconvenient, could you please restore the images for the article Pakbeng and for the Ban Houayxay article, under the neccesary licenses. Thanks for your time! --Gregorof 19:48, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
Dawson_College_Shooting
Do you have a photo of the underground tunnel that goes under the college. I've seen you have already uploaded 3 to the article Dawson_College_Shooting. Hello32020 19:14, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, I don't. I couldnt get that close. --Gregorof 19:16, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
Hi, Im a journalist at La Presse. Can you give me a quick phone call 514-350-4837 to talk about this current event article. I never tought that Wikipedians were that fast. Thanks
And I'm a reporter for Le Journal de Montreal. Also interested in hearing from you : 514-928-8436.
Your images on Dawson College shooting
Hey, since you took those pictures yourself and have released them into the public domain, you should upload them to Wikimedia Commons, which is a collection of public domain images that can be used in articles (you don't have to if you don't want to, though). If you do, be sure to give them different file names to avoid conflicts. The images will automatically be transwikied here, so you can just replace the old filenames with the new ones. --Coredesat talk! 19:16, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
- Sure, thanks, I'll do that, gimme a bit of time, still working on the article. In fact, I'll do that with the rest of my pictures too. PS, if you are an administrator can you please see the earlier discussion on this page with Robdurbar. Hes been away and unable to do what that stuff. Thanks. --Gregorof 19:21, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry, I'm not an admin, so I probably can't help with that case. --Coredesat talk! 21:54, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
Stubs
Hi Gregorof - no, it's fine to have up to about four stub templates on an article. What you didn't notice was that I remoed the SEAsia stub and also changed the Laos-stub to Laos-geo-stub. Since there's now a Laos-geo-stub it doesn't also need a SEAsia-geo-stub. You probably didn't notice because the Laos-geo-stub currently feeds back into both Category:Southeast Asia geography stubs and Category:Laos stubs - there aren't enough of them yet for their own separate stub category (there may be soon, the number of Laos-geo-stubs is growing quite fast). Grutness...wha? 06:44, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks then. Is there anything I can help you with project-wise? Im still a new editor, and am finishing up my wikipedia to-do list, and looking for things to do. Dont mind doing the nitty-gritty stuff, ie stub organizing ( I am definately a WikiGnome ) ... please let me know. --Gregorof 07:10, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
- Well, Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting is always looking for more members - we'd be happy to see you over there if you'd like to help out! Grutness...wha? 07:50, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
Rumi
Thanks! :-) I saw here–it was in response to the previous comments, where the Persian and Turkish editors were fighting over his ethnicity. I don't mind at all...ciao. —Khoikhoi 07:47, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
BC
Thanks for the warm greeting. Actually, I go to McGill (but have more friends at Concordia - which probably meansd something). Victoriagirl 23:01, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
Welcome to VandalProof!
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Gregorof! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 20:34, 11 October 2006 (UTC)