Jump to content

User talk:Teambk: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Removing protection templates from unprotected page
Remove NPP auto notice
Line 22: Line 22:
----
----
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then contact administrators by submitting a request to the ''[[Wikipedia:Unblock Ticket Request System|Unblock Ticket Request System]]''. If the block is a [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy#CheckUser blocks|CheckUser]] or [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy#Oversight blocks|Oversight]] block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]].<br><small>Please note that there could be appeals to the [[Wikipedia:Unblock Ticket Request System|unblock ticket request system]] that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.</small><p></div><!-- Template:Blocked talk-revoked-notice -->
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then contact administrators by submitting a request to the ''[[Wikipedia:Unblock Ticket Request System|Unblock Ticket Request System]]''. If the block is a [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy#CheckUser blocks|CheckUser]] or [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy#Oversight blocks|Oversight]] block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]].<br><small>Please note that there could be appeals to the [[Wikipedia:Unblock Ticket Request System|unblock ticket request system]] that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.</small><p></div><!-- Template:Blocked talk-revoked-notice -->

== Speedy deletion nomination of 2018 Singapore Community Shield ==

Hello Teambk,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged [[2018 Singapore Community Shield]] for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, [[[[Singapore Community Shield]]]].

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can <span class="plainlinks">'''[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title={{urlencode:Talk:2018 Singapore Community Shield}}&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion]'''</span>, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on [[User_talk:Atsme|my talk page]] if you have questions.

<sup>[[User:Atsme|<span style="text-shadow:#F8F8FF 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em,#F4BBFF -0.2em -0.3em 0.6em,#BFFF00 0.8em 0.8em 0.6em;color:#A2006D">Atsme</span>]][[User talk:Atsme |📞]][[Special:EmailUser/Atsme|📧]]</sup> 11:51, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:53, 23 February 2018

November 2017

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Fenix down (talk) 09:39, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You have been blocked again for this edit amongst others. We have been over this time and again, the official FIFA name for the Taiwan national football team is Chinese Taipei national football team, yet you insist on continuing to replace {{fb|TPE}} with {{fb|TWN}}. Your blocks are only going to get longer and longer the more you continue to edit against consensus. Fenix down (talk) 09:45, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Teambk (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

_

Decline reason:

The interaction below makes it clear that you do not intend to address the actions that resulted in this block. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:35, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

_|_

only flag, u lost your mind? What logic. u dont like then block? I can just update it. You from China?

You've been blocked multiple times for this. I have tried explaining this to you on multiple occasions but it doesn't seem to be sinking in. We follow the official FIFA terminology on enWiki to avoid any confusion as this is what is done in the wider English speaking world. You need to adhere to this. Your inability to is the reason for your repeated blocks. Fenix down (talk) 09:51, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
ok, unblock me. i will amend it
I have amended already where I have noticed. I am prepared to unblock you, but you need to state in writing here that you understand that consensus is to use {{fb|TPE}} not {{fb|TWN}} and that you will not make any edits to the contrary unless consensus changes. Fenix down (talk) 09:57, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
BUT the club national flag is already there for so long. Im just following. Pls change back.
Not relevant, when referring to nationality for FIFA international purposes TPE is what is used. Fenix down (talk) 10:07, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
ok. just unblock me then
Firstly I think I need to hear a little more than just OK. I want you to make it clear to me you understand what you were blocked for. More importantly though, I think we will wait until the end of This sockpuppet investigation before deciding. Fenix down (talk) 11:34, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Stop hand
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.