Jump to content

Agrawal's conjecture: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:


==Truth or falsehood==
==Truth or falsehood==
The conjecture was formulated by Rajat Bhattacharjee and Prashant Pandey in their 2001 thesis.<ref>{{cite journal|author=Rajat Bhattacharjee, Prashant Pandey|date=April 2001|title=Primality Testing|journal=Technical report|publisher=[[Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur|IIT Kanpur]]}}</ref> It has been computationally verified for <math>r < 100</math> and <math>n < 10^{10}</math>.<ref>{{cite journal|author=Neeraj Kayal, Nitin Saxena|year=2002|title=Towards a deterministic polynomial-time Primality Test|journal=Technical report|publisher=IIT Kanpur|url=http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download;jsessionid=26D074BAD51A77850596AC6713BBC741?doi=10.1.1.16.9281&rep=rep1&type=pdf}}</ref>
The conjecture was formulated by Rajat Bhattacharjee and Prashant Pandey in their 2001 thesis.<ref>{{cite journal|author=Rajat Bhattacharjee, Prashant Pandey|date=April 2001|title=Primality Testing|journal=Technical report|publisher=[[Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur|IIT Kanpur]]}}</ref> It has been computationally verified for <math>r < 100</math> and <math>n < 10^{10}</math>,<ref>{{cite journal|author=Neeraj Kayal, Nitin Saxena|year=2002|title=Towards a deterministic polynomial-time Primality Test|journal=Technical report|publisher=IIT Kanpur|url=http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download;jsessionid=26D074BAD51A77850596AC6713BBC741?doi=10.1.1.16.9281&rep=rep1&type=pdf}}</ref> and for <math>r = 5, n < 10^{11}</math>.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.cse.iitk.ac.in/users/nitin/talks/Dec2014-3Paris.pdf|title=Primality & Prime Number Generation|last=Saxena|first=Nitin|date=Dec 2014|publisher=UPMC Paris|accessdate=24 April 2018}}</ref>


However, a heuristic argument by [[Carl Pomerance]] and [[Hendrik W. Lenstra]] suggests there are infinitely many counterexamples.<ref name=LP03b>{{cite web|last=Lenstra|first=H. W.|first2=Carl|last2=Pomerance|date=2003|title=Remarks on Agrawal’s conjecture.|url=http://www.aimath.org/WWN/primesinp/primesinp.pdf|publisher=American Institute of Mathematics|accessdate=16 October 2013}}</ref> In particular, the heuristic shows that such counterexamples have asymptotic density greater than <math>\tfrac{1}{n^{\varepsilon}}</math> for any <math>\varepsilon > 0</math>.
However, a heuristic argument by [[Carl Pomerance]] and [[Hendrik W. Lenstra]] suggests there are infinitely many counterexamples.<ref name=LP03b>{{cite web|last=Lenstra|first=H. W.|first2=Carl|last2=Pomerance|date=2003|title=Remarks on Agrawal’s conjecture.|url=http://www.aimath.org/WWN/primesinp/primesinp.pdf|publisher=American Institute of Mathematics|accessdate=16 October 2013}}</ref> In particular, the heuristic shows that such counterexamples have asymptotic density greater than <math>\tfrac{1}{n^{\varepsilon}}</math> for any <math>\varepsilon > 0</math>.

Revision as of 19:30, 24 April 2018

In number theory, Agrawal's conjecture, due to Manindra Agrawal in 2002,[1] forms the basis for the cyclotomic AKS test. Agrawal's conjecture states formally:

Let and be two coprime positive integers. If

then either is prime or

Ramifications

If Agrawal's conjecture were true, it would decrease the runtime complexity of the AKS primality test from to .

Truth or falsehood

The conjecture was formulated by Rajat Bhattacharjee and Prashant Pandey in their 2001 thesis.[2] It has been computationally verified for and ,[3] and for .[4]

However, a heuristic argument by Carl Pomerance and Hendrik W. Lenstra suggests there are infinitely many counterexamples.[5] In particular, the heuristic shows that such counterexamples have asymptotic density greater than for any .

Assuming Agrawal's conjecture is false by the above argument, Roman B. Popovych conjectures a modified version may still be true:

Let and be two coprime positive integers. If

and

then either is prime or .[6]

Distributed computing

Both Agrawal's conjecture and Popovych's conjecture are being tested by distributed computing project Primaboinca, which was started in 2010 based on BOINC. As of June 2017, the project found no counterexample for .

Notes

  1. ^ Agrawal, Manindra; Kayal, Neeraj; Saxena, Nitin (2004). "PRIMES is in P" (PDF). Annals of Mathematics. 160 (2): 781–793. doi:10.4007/annals.2004.160.781. JSTOR 3597229.
  2. ^ Rajat Bhattacharjee, Prashant Pandey (April 2001). "Primality Testing". Technical report. IIT Kanpur.
  3. ^ Neeraj Kayal, Nitin Saxena (2002). "Towards a deterministic polynomial-time Primality Test". Technical report. IIT Kanpur.
  4. ^ Saxena, Nitin (Dec 2014). "Primality & Prime Number Generation" (PDF). UPMC Paris. Retrieved 24 April 2018.
  5. ^ Lenstra, H. W.; Pomerance, Carl (2003). "Remarks on Agrawal's conjecture" (PDF). American Institute of Mathematics. Retrieved 16 October 2013.
  6. ^ Popovych, Roman (30 December 2008), A note on Agrawal conjecture (PDF), retrieved 21 April 2018

External links