Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perfect Master (Meher Baba): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 16:14, 13 May 2018

Perfect Master (Meher Baba)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I fail to see much notability of the subject and non-trivial significant coverage about it, except in the biographical hagiography of Meher Baba and self-sources.Trivial mentions in related books are located. Notability isn't inherited.

Part of a walled garden around Meher Baba.Nukable mess.

This t/p thread may provide some nackgound aspects on the issue. ~ Winged Blades^Godric 07:26, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ~ Winged Blades^Godric 07:26, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep, sourced and a notable article, and per noticing that the nominator is coordinating many recent deletion noms and tags within the Baba universe of articles on Wikipedia, thus attempting to "gut" a notable topic here. As with other pages under this deletion blitz, I am sad to say that I must even mention that I am not in a cult about Baba nor belong to any related organization. I'm an editor who is seeing a topic under "attack", with language and talk-page discussions used for this purpose. I would suggest that all of these noms and deletion attempts be removed because of the bias shown in the communications about these pages. Randy Kryn (talk) 15:08, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks and congratulations on your finding.Now, please provide the sources, since you've gladly forgot the main criterion of defending the notability of an article.And, you may like to read WP:ILIKEIT.~ Winged Blades^Godric 08:42, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
'Delete This is a dictionary definition bloated by walls of text from self-sourced info. Edward321 (talk) 14:23, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Source already on the page, a book published by Allen & Unwin, a major publishing house, is listed as a citation and reference. Does the nominator not look at and study references of each article he (or she) lists? Please close this nomination as unwarranted. Thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 14:27, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep And the reason to delete this is what? This is an important well-referenced article that many in the religious and new religious field may find extremely helpful. Note this is part of a dozen article sweep of Meher Baba related articles listed for deletion and initiated by two editors on a jihad. Dazedbythebell (talk) 16:14, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 *'''Delete'' This is a dictionary definition bloated by walls of text from self-sourced info. [[User:Edward321|Edward321]] ([[User talk:Edward321|talk]]) 14:23, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
 *'''Source already on the page''', a book published by [[Allen & Unwin]], a major publishing house, is listed as a citation and reference. Does the nominator not look at and study references of each article he (or she) lists? Please close this nomination as unwarranted. Thanks. [[User:Randy Kryn|Randy Kryn]] ([[User talk:Randy Kryn|talk]]) 14:27, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
+*'''Keep''' And the reason to delete this is what? This is an important well-referenced article that many in the religious and new religious field may find extremely helpful. Note this is part of a dozen article sweep of Meher Baba related articles listed for deletion and initiated by two editors on a jihad. [[User:Dazedbythebell|Dazedbythebell]] ([[User talk:Dazedbythebell|talk]]) 16:14, 13 May 2018 (UTC)