User:Randy Kryn

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(In his less-lucid moments this editor self-identifies as a Wikipedian citizen of Krynn)

Hello! Thanks for coming by. Pull up a chair. Pretzels? An 1881 timeline of human history? As a Wikipedia editor since 2007 I've added to various lists and indexes, juggled with American founding father templates (see below) and your odd science/space/Stone Age art/baseball edits, and carelessly tossed a handful of words into a few suffragist articles, 1960s pages, and other odds and ends. A few italic runs and linked-page distributions of lists and templates have occurred in-between fits of popcorn.

Notes on work with James Bevel's 1960s Civil Rights Movement history[edit]

A long time ago, while still eating meat and walking around dehydrated and Vitamin-C deficient, I likely snuck onto the top tier of 1960s Civil Rights Movement historians, a fairly small and stuffy room inhabited by David Garrow (a nice fellow), Taylor Branch, Adam Fairclough, and one or two others. Garrow and Branch are among the few people who know I may be riding and/or making the coffee on that tier. Except for promoting my early findings during a political campaign as James Bevel's unpaid press secretary (he was a sure loser in a heavily party-controlled district, and I told him that I'd take the position knowing he wouldn't win and would work mainly, if not solely, on independently researching his history with himself and others) I've never gone full boar on promoting it.

Look! An emu!

Yet since 2007 my cited James Bevel research has been included in Bevel's article, on various Wikipedia talk pages, and on or under other scandalous internet outcroppings. Nobody has ever disputed a major point on Bevel's role in history in the article, nor has anyone cited sources which contradict it. James Bevel simply did all the things in the 1960s movements that he gets credit for on the page. I've edited only the 60's data in his article, and have very seldom if ever edited the material on his strange LaRouche period, his incest conviction, or anything besides his 1960s Civil Rights Movement history (and a bit on his role in the 1995 Day of Atonement/Million Man March).

Back in the bygone days of lore, 2005, Middlebury College published one of my papers. That paper echoed and added to earlier writings, including a 1984 research paper reprinted, with a new addendum, in the 1989 book We Shall Overcome, Volume II edited by David Garrow. The only fact privately or academically questioned in these publications concerns an event not used in the Wikipedia article. Historian James Ralph publicly disputed Bevel's version of the agreement which ended the 1966 Chicago Open Housing Movement (see my 2005 paper). Since Bevel, as SCLC's Director of Direct Action, initiated and ran SCLC's Open Housing Movement, as he did all of their major movements starting with the 1963 Birmingham Children's Crusade, I counted on him to remember how he agreed to end it (an interesting story he repeated over the years without much variation). That one point aside - and I still stand by it - if the rest of the Bevel information accurately reflects the events of the era it means that a very nice thing has emerged for new Civil Rights Movement historians and students, either established, just in-or-out of university, or seeking an academic specialty: a large historical field which could use more picking and data mining.

Research I haven't done includes James Bevel related interviews with Dorothy Cotton, James Meredith, Bob Moses and a few other key people from the '60s movements. Those need doing, and hopefully done well and honestly, with direct questions and with a stated goal of ascertaining the facts about James Bevel's role in the events of the era. I also haven't interviewed the law enforcement side of the Selma and Birmingham Movements, and suggest that as long as any police personnel or Alabama State Troopers who manned the Birmingham or Selma frontlines still walk the earth, first hose them down and then interview them. Aside from any new Bevel and King material, those interviews should uncover new information and points of view on the era's historical events and perspectives.

Tools an established or student historian may find useful would include the Bevel audio and video tapes in the hands of a wide variety of relatives, friends, pedestrians, and organizations. I don't know how many hundreds of hours of tapes exist, but there are quite a few in various locations. An inventory of those materials doesn't exist, which opens up another task for interested researchers. Going through those tapes and videos would dig up many nuggets on 1960s movement history, and ther'be lots of gold left in dem dere hills.

Another avenue: Nobody has fully, or in most cases even partially, interviewed Bevel's relatives, his students from the '60s, or his post-movement associates, friends, and students, all available areas of inquiry.

Overall, James Bevel's place in history, and his observations about the late-1950s and '60s movement years, deserve further full research projects. The available potential information and further sets of data on Bevel's work will enhance the accumulated information on every major 1960s Civil Rights Movement action and some of the major '60s Anti-War Movement events.

Well, time to edit! If you haven't joined your expertise, interests, or spare-time and/or space-time curiosities with Wikipedia, be assured that it ably fulfills its intended purpose as a good and accurate place to share knowledge - knowledge which you consider interesting, fun, and important to chronicle in any field of endeavor. Knowledge that you can back up with sources and data in a neutral voice, like a robot.

Since you've hung around this long - lentils and rice? - some recommendations. Aaron Sorkin's 25-episode television series The Newsroom, and Anne Hathaway's 18-minutes of time in Les Miserables (possibly the best performance of her generation).

Here are some maps I've thrown together or added to - templates remind me of maps, a one-stop visual of links to all of the important and/or interesting Wikipedia articles on their subjects - articles which hundreds, and in many cases, thousands of Wikipedians have researched and written:

Templates created:

Swimming Reindeer, a 12,500-year-old sculpture by an unknown artist, featured on the List of Stone Age art

Existing templates given a few coats of paint and a new wine cellar: {{Prehistoric technology}} {{Suffrage}} {{Slavery}} {{African-American Civil Rights Movement}} {{Benjamin Franklin}} {{Jesus footer}} {{George Washington}} {{Abraham Lincoln}} {{William Howard Taft}} {{Woodrow Wilson}} {{Franklin D. Roosevelt}} {{Harry S. Truman}} {{Dwight D. Eisenhower}} {{John F. Kennedy}} {{Émile Durkheim}} and others

Existing templates seasoned a bit: {{Veganism and vegetarianism}} {{Chess}} {{Mohandas K. Gandhi}} {{Martin Luther King}} {{Nikola Tesla}} {{Nelson Mandela}} {{Pete Seeger}} {{Kurt Vonnegut}} {{Thomas Paine}} {{Mark Twain}} {{Herbert Hoover}} {{Lyndon B. Johnson}} {{Richard Nixon}} {{Gerald Ford}} {{Jimmy Carter}} {{Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis}} {{Robert F. Kennedy}} {{Assassination of John F. Kennedy}} {{Winston Churchill}} {{Underground Railroad}} {{Historical American Documents}} {{Gautama Buddha}} {{Martin Luther}} {{Particles}} {{Ray Bradbury}} and others.

1+ This user has made more than 1 contribution to Wikipedia.
Master Editor IV