Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reactions to the 2019 Pulwama attack: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 11:32, 17 February 2019

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Per WP:SK criterion 1: nominator is advocating remain in place of a WP:MERGE. (non-admin closure) ——SerialNumber54129 11:32, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reactions to the 2019 Pulwama attack

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unneeded spin-off from the main article (2019 Pulwama attack), don't see any reason for a separate article for now. Gotitbro (talk) 10:41, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose, Reactions section was larger than the article. The real solution is to stop making long Reactions sections, and to stop abusing flagicons by putting them in Reactions sections. Abductive (reasoning) 10:43, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

From what I know "reaction" articles have been created for only highly covered international events and I don't see this being the case right now (WP:TOOSOON). The article is about an ongoing event some discrepancies are going to be there such as the reaction being too long. I don't see the notability of a separate reaction article for now. Gotitbro (talk) 10:52, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Highly covered" Do you want me to cite tons of international news sources that covered this? 119.82.70.109 (talk) 10:56, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What about Reactions to the November 2015 Paris attacks, Reactions to the September 11 attacks 119.82.70.109 (talk) 10:45, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
-===[[:Reactions to the 2019 Pulwama attack]]===
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
-{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|S}}
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was '''speedy keep'''. Per [[WP:SK]] criterion 1: nominator is advocating remain in place of a [[WP:MERGE]]. <small>[[Wikipedia:NACD|(non-admin closure)]]</small> [[User:Serial Number 54129|<span style="color:black">'''——'''</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Serial Number 54129|<span style="color:black">''SerialNumber''</span>]][[User talk:Serial Number 54129|<span style="color:#8B0000">54129</span>]] 11:32, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
+===[[:Reactions to the 2019 Pulwama attack]]===
 <noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>
 :{{la|Reactions to the 2019 Pulwama attack}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reactions to the 2019 Pulwama attack|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2019 February 17#{{anchorencode:Reactions to the 2019 Pulwama attack}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Reactions_to_the_2019_Pulwama_attack Stats]</span>)
@@ Line 10: / Line 15: @@
 ::<i>"Highly covered"</i> Do you want me to cite tons of international news sources that covered this? [[Special:Contributions/119.82.70.109|119.82.70.109]] ([[User talk:119.82.70.109|talk]]) 10:56, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
 *What about [[Reactions to the November 2015 Paris attacks]], [[Reactions to the September 11 attacks]] [[Special:Contributions/119.82.70.109|119.82.70.109]] ([[User talk:119.82.70.109|talk]]) 10:45, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
+{{clear}}
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>