Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Local Nature Reserves in Surrey/archive1: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Dudley Miles (talk | contribs) |
closing- promoted |
||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
:*Otherwise looks good to me, these are just 3 small quibbles, and I will thus '''Support''' preemptively. [[User:Mattximus|Mattximus]] ([[User talk:Mattximus|talk]]) 17:12, 2 March 2019 (UTC) |
:*Otherwise looks good to me, these are just 3 small quibbles, and I will thus '''Support''' preemptively. [[User:Mattximus|Mattximus]] ([[User talk:Mattximus|talk]]) 17:12, 2 March 2019 (UTC) |
||
::*Many thanks {{u|Mattximus}}. Replies above. [[User:Dudley Miles|Dudley Miles]] ([[User talk:Dudley Miles|talk]]) 18:07, 2 March 2019 (UTC) |
::*Many thanks {{u|Mattximus}}. Replies above. [[User:Dudley Miles|Dudley Miles]] ([[User talk:Dudley Miles|talk]]) 18:07, 2 March 2019 (UTC) |
||
Source review passed, in keeping with the rest of the series, promoted. --'''[[User:PresN|<span style="color:green">Pres</span>]][[User talk:PresN|<span style="color:blue">N</span>]]''' 21:10, 13 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
{{FLCClosed|promoted}} |
|||
Revision as of 21:10, 13 March 2019
List of Local Nature Reserves in Surrey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Nominator(s): Dudley Miles (talk) 17:42, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
This is the latest in my nominations of lists of Local Nature Reserves and is in the same format as FLs such as Kent and Suffolk. Dudley Miles (talk) 17:42, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
- Support – Looks great to me. Great job as always! Care to check out my new FLC? BeatlesLedTV (talk) 19:17, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
- Support Looks good. A map might have been nice. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 01:04, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
- Comments
- Ashtead Park - "and...and..." should just be comma and one "and".
- "Fauna include the broad-bodied chaser and emperor dragonfly and the common blue damselfly." The and...and is because the chaser and emperor are both species of dragonfly. Would it work if I changed to "Fauna include the broad-bodied chaser and emperor dragonflies and the common blue damselfly." Dudley Miles (talk) 18:07, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
- That works! Mattximus (talk) 02:59, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
- "This site, which is managed by local volunteers, has grassland, a wildflower meadow, allotments, a butterfly garden and a community orchard where a local variety of apple, the Lingfield Forge is being grown." Could be two sentences (and a butterfly garden. A community orchard.... ) and then fix up the wording on the second sentence a bit, it might be missing a comma.
- Fixed. Dudley Miles (talk) 18:07, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
- "The moth fauna is outstanding" is not very encyclopedic. Is there a better word?
- I am not clear what you think is wrong. Are you objecting to "fauna" or "outstanding"? Dudley Miles (talk) 18:07, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
- Outstanding sounded like a bitter of a hyperbole to me. Mattximus (talk) 02:58, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
- Mattximus how about "The moth fauna is described by Natural England as outstanding"? Dudley Miles (talk) 09:20, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
- Otherwise looks good to me, these are just 3 small quibbles, and I will thus Support preemptively. Mattximus (talk) 17:12, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
- Many thanks Mattximus. Replies above. Dudley Miles (talk) 18:07, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
Source review passed, in keeping with the rest of the series, promoted. --PresN 21:10, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.