User talk:The Eloquent Peasant: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Clovermoss (talk | contribs) Comment |
Clovermoss (talk | contribs) →Short description suggestion?: comment |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
== Short description suggestion? == |
== Short description suggestion? == |
||
I see that you're fairly active at the wikiproject, I was wondering if you could make a suggestion (or create) a short description for the [[Alexei Nikolaevich, Tsarevich of Russia]]? The current wikidata description is factually correct, but I'm not sure if it's a good idea to include as a short description, since he was executed in 1918 and Russia is no longer a monarchy. [[User:Clovermoss|Clovermoss]] ([[User talk:Clovermoss|talk]]) 20:48, 22 April 2019 (UTC) |
I see that you're fairly active at the wikiproject, I was wondering if you could make a suggestion (or create) a short description for the [[Alexei Nikolaevich, Tsarevich of Russia]]? The current wikidata description is factually correct, but I'm not sure if it's a good idea to include as a short description, since he was executed in 1918 and Russia is no longer a monarchy. [[User:Clovermoss|Clovermoss]] ([[User talk:Clovermoss|talk]]) 20:48, 22 April 2019 (UTC) |
||
:Thanks for your message. What an incredible history for this boy and family! I can suggest something like "Last heir apparent of the last imperial family of Russia" What would you suggest? --[[User:Level C|The Eloquent Peasant]] ([[User talk:Level C#top|talk]]) 23:07, 22 April 2019 (UTC) |
|||
:: That might work. Part of the reason I'm thinking it's complicated is his father's abdication of the throne, which made him king for a brief period of time, before his father decided to name his uncle Michael, instead. So... he could be the "last heir apparent", "heir apparent" (in two different ways - because he would also be Michael's heir apparent, or "king". [[User:Clovermoss|Clovermoss]] ([[User talk:Clovermoss|talk]]) 23:49, 22 April 2019 (UTC) |
|||
:::Whatever you would like to put is fine. ;) --[[User:Level C|The Eloquent Peasant]] ([[User talk:Level C#top|talk]]) 01:36, 23 April 2019 (UTC) |
|||
:::: I'm going to go with your suggestion, then. It seems to be the best option. I just wanted to talk it through with someone first before creating one. [[User:Clovermoss|Clovermoss]] ([[User talk:Clovermoss|talk]]) 01:44, 23 April 2019 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:44, 23 April 2019
Archive 1
Archive 2
Archive 3
Archive 4
Short description suggestion?
I see that you're fairly active at the wikiproject, I was wondering if you could make a suggestion (or create) a short description for the Alexei Nikolaevich, Tsarevich of Russia? The current wikidata description is factually correct, but I'm not sure if it's a good idea to include as a short description, since he was executed in 1918 and Russia is no longer a monarchy. Clovermoss (talk) 20:48, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for your message. What an incredible history for this boy and family! I can suggest something like "Last heir apparent of the last imperial family of Russia" What would you suggest? --The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 23:07, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
- That might work. Part of the reason I'm thinking it's complicated is his father's abdication of the throne, which made him king for a brief period of time, before his father decided to name his uncle Michael, instead. So... he could be the "last heir apparent", "heir apparent" (in two different ways - because he would also be Michael's heir apparent, or "king". Clovermoss (talk) 23:49, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
- Whatever you would like to put is fine. ;) --The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 01:36, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
- I'm going to go with your suggestion, then. It seems to be the best option. I just wanted to talk it through with someone first before creating one. Clovermoss (talk) 01:44, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
- Whatever you would like to put is fine. ;) --The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 01:36, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
- That might work. Part of the reason I'm thinking it's complicated is his father's abdication of the throne, which made him king for a brief period of time, before his father decided to name his uncle Michael, instead. So... he could be the "last heir apparent", "heir apparent" (in two different ways - because he would also be Michael's heir apparent, or "king". Clovermoss (talk) 23:49, 22 April 2019 (UTC)