User talk:Headbomb

User	Talk	Archives	My work	Sandbox	Resources	News	Stats

---

LibriVox

Hi Headbomb. You deleted 3 links to LibriVox. Although currently LibriVox doesn't have a huge selection of audio books with the word "Physics" or "Chemistry" or "Biology" in the title over time that library will grow. These books are old and may appear irrelevant to modern research but they still have value. It would be nice to have access to free audio books with the most current information but copyright prevents this. The goal of this Wikipedia page is to enable people to learn about Physics. Many people have jobs and don't want to spend their whole lives sitting still looking at screens or printed text. Audio books allow people to learn about Physics while working, cleaning their homes, driving, walking outside, caring for children, etc. Almost all of the links on this Wikipedia page are to other pages with text or video. If you could create a link to LibriVox that selected all the audio books in the Physics category that would be ideal instead of just searching for books with the word "Physics" in the title. Thanks.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by GeoffreyEdwards (talk • contribs)

Reference organizer script

Awesome job on 2I/Borisov, thanks! I was just thinking of doing it manually. Turns out, there's a script for that. Sometimes it pays off to be a procrastinator One thing I would like the script to do, though, is to align the "=" characters, like so:

<ref name="CBAT4670">
{{cite web
 |title      = IAU Electronic Telegram No. 4670
 |publisher  = Central Bureau for Astronomical Telegrams
 |url        = https://pdssbn.astro.umd.edu/cbet/2019/4670.html
 |url-status = live
 |accessdate = 2019-09-25
}}</ref>

I think it's much easier to spot an occasional typo this way. What do you think? — UnladenSwallow (talk) 14:01, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

@UnladenSwallow: Doesn't make much of a difference to me either way. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 14:05, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Update your UCB script for hashtags

https://github.com/ms609/citation-bot/pull/2173 You have your own, if you change your via= AManWithNoPlan (talk) 22:37, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

@AManWithNoPlan: what do I need to change it to? via=User%3AHeadbomb%2Fcitations.js? Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 05:43, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Change via=toolbar to via=Headbomb — Preceding unsigned comment added by AManWithNoPlan (talk • contribs)

Done, although having a mask is a very sub-optimal/semantically awful way of doing things, since I'm not doing this via 'Headbomb', but rather via 'User:Headbomb/citations.js' and you can't declare things like via=Category:CS1 errors: DOI, via={{cite arXiv}}, etc... Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 13:13, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Also did you mean via=Headbomb or edit=Headbomb? Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 13:15, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Oooops. edit, not via. AManWithNoPlan (talk) 13:47, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

HEALPix

hi Headbomb - I put a COI warning in my recent edit at HEALPix - so feel free to switch the discussion to Talk:HEALPix if you think my ref edits are a problem. Boud (talk) 15:59, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

to talk

1. It is a title, not a sentence 2. it is typographically sound 3. you could have gone to talk too 4. once disputed, one should not discuss through editsummary

-DePiep (talk) 21:17, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Please (and strongly advised) you revert until talk concludes. -DePiep (talk) 21:18, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

I took it to talk, but I will not revert myself, because you are wrong about this. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 21:19, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

all OK?

Boy, Sir, everything fine? You're so verbally/editingly aggressive. Anything wrong, I can do for you? DePiep (talk) 00:35, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

You can retract your condescending remarks and bad faith attacks on me, for one. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 00:49, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

editwarring

Hi. It was me who designed the category and its purpose. So one can leave it up to me to decide on required content. At least you could have questioned my purpose. (And once more you are imposing a maintenance process without being involved in the maintenance). -DePiep (talk) 15:55, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

So please put those two pages in the state I brought them. -DePiep (talk) 15:56, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

See WP:OWN. And as for putting them back in Category:Isotope content page, the category is explicitly for content pages (Deuterium, Tritium), not for redirects (Hydrogen-1, Hydrogen-2). Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 15:57, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

No not owning, it is the way this maintenance thing is designed to be. You did not ask clarification, nor strart any talk at all. Another case in which you obviously want to enforce/deny a maintenance sedtup in a topic you are not involved in (i.e., outsider). Also note that you are trespassing WP:3RR.

(NB the answer to the question you still have not asked is: Hydrogen-1, Hydrogen-2 are standard isotope-names and these isotpes have a content page). -DePiep (talk) 11:44, 11 October 2019 (UTC)