User talk:Suneye1: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 10:30, 22 April 2020

Article on Portuguese in South-India

Hi, I am still unsure about the specifics but most sources I have read indicate the Portuguese converted approx. 20 000 people to Latin Catholics on the Tamil Nadu coast and implemented Papal authority within Kerala and Tamil Nadu to the Christians there already, this is included in the Latin Catholic past. There seems to be confusion within the article regarding the geography of the two coasts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.111.39.134 (talk) 10:42, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year Suneye1!

Happy New Year!

Hello Suneye1:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve the encyclopedia for Wikipedia's readers, and have a happy and enjoyable New Year! Cheers, Donner60 (talk) 23:21, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks (static)}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.

Persecution of Christians in the post–Cold War era

Hello User:Suneye1! I hope this message finds you doing well. I noticed your contributions on an article I just edited and thought you might be interested in expanding the article on the persecution of Christians in the modern era. As of now, the article is in poor shape. The website of International Christian Concern and the website of Voice of the Martyrs have quite a bit of information on these topics, with some of these stories being covered in mainstream sources searchable on any search engine. I look forward to hearing from you! With regards, Anupam^Talk 15:39, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Anupam:, I will surely take a look when i get some time. :) - SUN EYE 1 16:21, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Violence against Christians in India, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:48, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Draft:2007 Christmas violence in Kandhamal into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Moneytrees🌴^{Talk🌲Help out at CCI!} 17:25, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

POVFORK and using Wikipedia for advocacy

You have created a number of WP:POVFORKs in violation of WP:CFORK and now you are going ahead to WP:EDITWAR to restore your POVFORKING.

If you restored to your faulty versions once again, then I will consider moving the issue to WP:ANI. Wikipedia is not for your WP:ADVOCACY and your edits, which are mainly about addressing the violence against Christians in India by providing lengthy details is disruptive. Srijanx22 (talk) 12:03, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Srijanx22: It's not a POVFORK its a WP:SIZESPLIT, see WP:PROSPLIT. The Section met the criteria for the SIZESPLIT. You are POV pushing right now. SUN EYE 1 12:12, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You can reply on Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Suneye1 where I have lodged a report against you. Srijanx22 (talk) 12:23, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 39: / Line 39: @@
 ::You can reply on [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Suneye1]] where I have lodged a report against you. [[User:Srijanx22|Srijanx22]] ([[User_talk:Srijanx22|talk]])  12:23, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
-==Do not bamboozling editors with multiple warning who do not conform to your POV and potential COI, instead please collaborate iteratively ==
-. Collaborate, instead of trying to silence with multiple warnings: Instead of attempting to engage in a mutually collaborative discussion first to enhance the articles ([[Lakshmanananda Saraswati]] and [[Murder of Swami Lakshmanananda]], seemingly both watched by you), you simply bombarded me first off with multiple warnings on my [[User_talk:58.182.176.169#Lakshmanananda_murder_case|talkpage here]]. This comes across a way of discouraging/silencing. Instead of negative ways, such as excessive warnings specially in first instance, please use the "positive" ways which demonstrate your willingness to work together in the "iterative enhancement" manner.
-. A quick glance through your talk page, gives an impression you are passionate about 'Christianity in India" related articles. I have [[WP:COI]] question for you, are you engaged in or active supporter of any missionary or evangelist activities, eg. including pushing or preserving the evangelist [[WP:POV]] on wikipedia?
-. I have also documented my specific concerns on the article talk page [[Talk:Lakshmanananda_Saraswati#Article_clean_up_and_concerns_about_evangelist_bias|related to the murder of Hindu monk Swami Lakshmanananda Saraswati]] for which 7 Christians were convicted. You are welcome to collaborate there. Do make sure you apply the rules consistently. For example, as a watcher editor if you have allowed the poor sources to remain there, but if I were to reuse the same sources to highlight the role of Christian evangelists extremists in the murder of Hindu saint for his anti-conversion activities, would you suddenly start objecting to those sources?
-. At this stage, this is exploratory discussion and I wish to understand you better. Do not bamboozle people, rephrase their edits by retaining good part and remove the objectionable part. It is very simple, just follow "Matthew 7:12" (requoted by Jesus on Temple Mount, "treat others the way you want to be treated"). I hope we have a better working relationship in future.
-Regards.
-[[Special:Contributions/58.182.176.169|58.182.176.169]] ([[User talk:58.182.176.169|talk]]) 09:55, 22 April 2020 (UTC)