Jump to content

User talk:Abbasquadir/Archives/: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
ClueBot III (talk | contribs)
Archiving 6 discussions from User talk:Abbasquadir. (BOT)
 
can be discussed on article talkpage
Line 30: Line 30:


About [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Genghis_Khan&diff=prev&oldid=970656806 this edit]--the book is published by Cambridge UP, one of the most important university presses in the world, not a book to be tagged with "better source needed". Thank you. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 14:10, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
About [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Genghis_Khan&diff=prev&oldid=970656806 this edit]--the book is published by Cambridge UP, one of the most important university presses in the world, not a book to be tagged with "better source needed". Thank you. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 14:10, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

== Archiving ==
You did some archiving at [[Talk:Sambhaji]], and you also set up <nowiki>{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis</nowiki> to do archiving. This produced two archives with incompatible name formats: [[:Talk:Sambhaji/Archive 1]] and [[:Talk:Sambhaji/Archives/2020/May]]. I have moved the latter to [[:Talk:Sambhaji/Archive 2]], and changed to a different archiving bot that uses the ''Archive 1'' naming convention. I know it is possible to set up ClueBot III to use that convention - but the instructions are cryptic. It seemed more sensible use a bot whose behaviour I could predict.<span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:10pt;color:#000000">--[[User:Toddy1| Toddy1]] [[User talk:Toddy1|(talk)]]</span> 06:09, 20 August 2020 (UTC)


== August 2020 ==
== August 2020 ==
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hi Abbasquadir! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor&#32;at [[:Mir Osman Ali Khan]] that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia{{Snd}} it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as [[typographical error|typo corrections]] or reverting obvious [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]]. Any edit that changes the ''meaning'' of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see [[Help:Minor edit]] for more information. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-minor --> [[User:Emir of Wikipedia|Emir of Wikipedia]] ([[User talk:Emir of Wikipedia|talk]]) 16:58, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hi Abbasquadir! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor&#32;at [[:Mir Osman Ali Khan]] that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia{{Snd}} it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as [[typographical error|typo corrections]] or reverting obvious [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]]. Any edit that changes the ''meaning'' of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see [[Help:Minor edit]] for more information. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-minor --> [[User:Emir of Wikipedia|Emir of Wikipedia]] ([[User talk:Emir of Wikipedia|talk]]) 16:58, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] [[Wikipedia:Welcoming committee/Welcome to Wikipedia|Welcome to Wikipedia]]. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at [[:Talk:Ayodhya]], is considered [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines#EDIT|bad practice]], even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the [[Wikipedia:Welcoming committee/Welcome to Wikipedia|welcome page]] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-tpv1 --> [[User:Kautilya3|Kautilya3]] ([[User talk:Kautilya3|talk]]) 19:24, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Deleting other people's talk page comments is not OK. I have reverted this at [[:Talk:Sambhaji]]. There is an archive-bot - this will archive the comments when the time is right. Alternatively, you can archive them yourself - but if you do make this clear in the edit summary. Archive bots are generally better because they avoid controversy.<span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:10pt;color:#000000">--[[User:Toddy1| Toddy1]] [[User talk:Toddy1|(talk)]]</span> 19:58, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:32, 20 August 2020


wikilinking

Hi, abbasquadir its good to find that you are interested in editing Hyderabad related articles.

Please know that according to wikilinking (WL) policy and FA standards only in a single instance we can WL within entire article. I appreciate your enthusiasm in editing but please avoid multiple linking. Otherwise articles FA status will be removed by the GCE. Regards- Happy editing. :)--Omer123hussain (talk) 07:27, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi Omerhussain,
Sure, I will do accordingly hereafter. Thank you for your appreciation!

Regards, Abbasquadir (talk) 09:31, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Regarding Bajirao I

Please explain your recent edits on article Bajirao I and also regarding templates. Mahusha (talk) 09:57, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Please specify which edits you are referring to here :) Abbasquadir (talk) 10:07, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Controversial topic area alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Template:Z33 — Newslinger talk 19:21, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

About this edit--the book is published by Cambridge UP, one of the most important university presses in the world, not a book to be tagged with "better source needed". Thank you. Drmies (talk) 14:10, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

August 2020

Information icon Hi Abbasquadir! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Mir Osman Ali Khan that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 16:58, 15 August 2020 (UTC)