User talk:Cumbey: Difference between revisions
RichardWeiss (talk | contribs) /* There is a dangerous character lurking on Wikipedia. He calls himself 'Squeakbox'. He commits unthinkable acts of vandalism. Besides utterly ruining the Javier Solana article, he maliciously van |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
He is very much a sycophant for Javier Solana. He chops, he misspells, he uses poor grammar, and then to add insult to injury accuses those he abuses of his very acts. In psychological terms, it is called PROJECTION!" He claims on his page to have flunked logic. Now that, I could believe! |
He is very much a sycophant for Javier Solana. He chops, he misspells, he uses poor grammar, and then to add insult to injury accuses those he abuses of his very acts. In psychological terms, it is called PROJECTION!" He claims on his page to have flunked logic. Now that, I could believe! |
||
==THERE IS NO CONSTANTINE CUMBEY== EXCEPT IN SQUEAKBOX'S DREAMS! |
|||
==WHO IS 'CONSTANTINE CUMBEY'? -- CERTAINLY NO NAME CONSTANCE E. CUMBEY HAS EVER USED!== |
|||
Well, Squeabox, I read your 'rantings'/writings on end time theories with great interest. If you think those are funny, check out Findhorn, Plant Devas, Luciferic Initiations, Antahkaranas", Rainbow Bridges, etc., Doctrine of Avatars, and the whole plenitude of so publicly expressed New Age beliefs. Makes orthodox Christian doctrine look pretty tame, doesn't it, Squeakbox? Unfortunately, I don't have all day to sit at a computer and edit. I have to practice law for a living. |
Well, Squeabox, I read your 'rantings'/writings on end time theories with great interest. If you think those are funny, check out Findhorn, Plant Devas, Luciferic Initiations, Antahkaranas", Rainbow Bridges, etc., Doctrine of Avatars, and the whole plenitude of so publicly expressed New Age beliefs. Makes orthodox Christian doctrine look pretty tame, doesn't it, Squeakbox? Unfortunately, I don't have all day to sit at a computer and edit. I have to practice law for a living. |
||
| Line 22: | Line 20: | ||
I have now put the document which I deleted, you reinserted and I redeleted from the Solana article into the Beast article. I have moved your bit about yourself to your User page [[User:Cumbey]] but if you don't want it there feel free to move it back here, or ask me to do so at [[User talk:SqueakBox]]. --[[User:SqueakBox|SqueakBox]] 21:31, Mar 3, 2005 (UTC) |
I have now put the document which I deleted, you reinserted and I redeleted from the Solana article into the Beast article. I have moved your bit about yourself to your User page [[User:Cumbey]] but if you don't want it there feel free to move it back here, or ask me to do so at [[User talk:SqueakBox]]. --[[User:SqueakBox|SqueakBox]] 21:31, Mar 3, 2005 (UTC) |
||
==User:68.61.150.80== |
|||
[[User:68.61.150.80|68.61.150.80]] [[Special:Contributions/ 68.61.150.80]] is Constantine Cumbey, as can be demonstrated by looking at the history of this page. She has regularly contributed to the article on [[Javier Solana]]. --[[User:SqueakBox|SqueakBox]] 22:27, Mar 3, 2005 (UTC) |
|||
==WHO IS 'CONSTANTINE CUMBEY'? -- CERTAINLY NO NAME CONSTANCE E. CUMBEY HAS EVER USED!== |
|||
Well, Squeabox, I read your 'rantings'/writings on end time theories with great interest. If you think those are funny, check out Findhorn, Plant Devas, Luciferic Initiations, Antahkaranas", Rainbow Bridges, etc., Doctrine of Avatars, and the whole plenitude of so publicly expressed New Age beliefs. Makes orthodox Christian doctrine look pretty tame, doesn't it, Squeakbox? Unfortunately, I don't have all day to sit at a computer and edit. I have to practice law for a living. |
Well, Squeabox, I read your 'rantings'/writings on end time theories with great interest. If you think those are funny, check out Findhorn, Plant Devas, Luciferic Initiations, Antahkaranas", Rainbow Bridges, etc., Doctrine of Avatars, and the whole plenitude of so publicly expressed New Age beliefs. Makes orthodox Christian doctrine look pretty tame, doesn't it, Squeakbox? Unfortunately, I don't have all day to sit at a computer and edit. I have to practice law for a living. |
||
| Line 40: | Line 34: | ||
I have prejudices, as we all do, but I do not bring them into my work at wikipedia. I would urge you to read [[NPOV|this]] about writing with a neutral viewpoint. Wikipedia is not a forum for people to express their opinions. It is an encyclopedia and therefore must remain impartial. Your changes to the [[Javier Solana]] article were obviously not coming from a neutral point of view, and have been reverted. Nobody cares re this article whether or not Solana is the Beast. It is a serious political article. If you want to document this 666 material you must do so at [[Number of the Beast (numerology)]] where they are interested in anything relating to the Beast and 666. Thanks for praying for me. Make sure it is a nice prayer. --[[User:SqueakBox|SqueakBox]] 15:43, Mar 3, 2005 (UTC) |
I have prejudices, as we all do, but I do not bring them into my work at wikipedia. I would urge you to read [[NPOV|this]] about writing with a neutral viewpoint. Wikipedia is not a forum for people to express their opinions. It is an encyclopedia and therefore must remain impartial. Your changes to the [[Javier Solana]] article were obviously not coming from a neutral point of view, and have been reverted. Nobody cares re this article whether or not Solana is the Beast. It is a serious political article. If you want to document this 666 material you must do so at [[Number of the Beast (numerology)]] where they are interested in anything relating to the Beast and 666. Thanks for praying for me. Make sure it is a nice prayer. --[[User:SqueakBox|SqueakBox]] 15:43, Mar 3, 2005 (UTC) |
||
I have now put the document which I deleted, you reinserted and I redeleted from the Solana article into the Beast article. I have moved your bit about yourself to your User page [[User:Cumbey]] but if you don't want it there feel free to move it back here, or ask me to do so at [[User talk:SqueakBox]]. --[[User:SqueakBox|SqueakBox]] 21:31, Mar 3, 2005 (UTC) |
|||
==User:68.61.150.80== |
|||
[[User:68.61.150.80|68.61.150.80]] [[Special:Contributions/ 68.61.150.80]] is Constantine Cumbey, as can be demonstrated by looking at the history of this page. She has regularly contributed to the article on [[Javier Solana]]. --[[User:SqueakBox|SqueakBox]] 22:27, Mar 3, 2005 (UTC) |
|||
==Reply to "Sockpuppet allegations"== |
|||
1. I don't even know what a sockpuppet is? |
|||
2. I have never used surrogates of any form on the web. |
|||
I don't now think you are using sockpuppets. Read about them [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet|here]]. |
|||
Read my conclusions on the Special talk page. |
|||
Can you tell me which of the IP addresses in the Detroit area are yours? (especially Allen Park, Rochester, Lake Orion and Detroit). Also did you make any edits from Jeffersonville, or from Toronto? If we can clarify which your edits were it would be helpful in elucidating the whole situation. I am not accusing you of being behind the vandalism except in in that the way the site was written made it a magnet for Beast believing vandals who liked the beast evidences you crammed the article with. |
|||
I am off to [[Guanaja]] for a few days in an hour but will continue with the case when I return, including improvements to the article based on Spanish material, and including getting Information From Answers.com to change your version for mine, and to get it off the German site where one of your Hungarian followers has helpfully translated it. Maybe it's in Hungarian too. I will check, and could recognise it by the word Solania. Also do remember I am accusing you of breaking wikipedia rules. That is no reason to insinuate unfounded and wild criminal allegations against me. --[[User:SqueakBox|SqueakBox]] 19:55, Mar 7, 2005 (UTC) |
|||
My question to you is "are you the originator of the Beast idea?" It's very imaginative, and has really taken off in the 9 years since you realised that he would make an excellent Beast candidate. Years ago someone had a similar idea about [[Haile Selassie]] that goes from strength to strength. Now and in the future all the Beast believers will be able to get better, clearer and more accurate information about Solana on which to form a judgement about his Beast candidacy. So I actually feel I have done you a great service by editing and organising the article, and look forward to researching and adding more information when I return. [[User:SqueakBox|SqueakBox]] 20:09, Mar 7, 2005 (UTC) |
|||
2005 (UTC) |
|||
My question to you is "are you the originator of the Beast idea"". It's quite imaginative, and I hope |
|||
Cumbey, you were wrong to assert that I wrote this ''The entire copy of the Javier Solana article has been added to the Number of the Beast (numerology) article. Because subtlety is not the hallmark of whoever is doing this. My money is on "bitter ex-girlfriend", but "big big fan of The Da Vinci Code" would not surprise me either.'' Check th record. It was an anonymous US user. I am not and hacve not been even passing through the USA in much longer than that, as I can prove.--[[User:SqueakBox|SqueakBox]] 05:25, Mar 7, 2005 (UTC) |
|||
==Page vandalism== |
|||
Do not vandalise my home page, sad woman. it is mine, you have no right to touch it, and you are now a vandalising troll as well as a POV monster.--[[User:SqueakBox|SqueakBox]] 15:15, Mar 10, 2005 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 03:07, 11 March 2005
There is a dangerous character lurking on Wikipedia. He calls himself 'Squeakbox'. He commits unthinkable acts of vandalism. Besides utterly ruining the Javier Solana article, he maliciously vandalized, this my own page. Then he went in unseemly manner to the Solana page and accused ME of vandalizing his page! He defied me to use my user name and then started a malicious and legally actionable campaign of imputing many, many user ID numbers to me. He is obviously afraid to use his real name. He has jumped in many times while I was writing, making me unable to finish my page without receiving a message that "somebody else started editing this page while you were editing . . ." He made demands to me on his page demanding I answer him there. When I attempted to do so, he cried like a little kid kicking somebody in the knees and then calling for his mommy! A real gentleman and scholar, he. Maybe that is the name his mother gave him!
He is very much a sycophant for Javier Solana. He chops, he misspells, he uses poor grammar, and then to add insult to injury accuses those he abuses of his very acts. In psychological terms, it is called PROJECTION!" He claims on his page to have flunked logic. Now that, I could believe!
Well, Squeabox, I read your 'rantings'/writings on end time theories with great interest. If you think those are funny, check out Findhorn, Plant Devas, Luciferic Initiations, Antahkaranas", Rainbow Bridges, etc., Doctrine of Avatars, and the whole plenitude of so publicly expressed New Age beliefs. Makes orthodox Christian doctrine look pretty tame, doesn't it, Squeakbox? Unfortunately, I don't have all day to sit at a computer and edit. I have to practice law for a living.
Constance E. Cumbey
cumbey@gmail.com
Javier Solana
Cumbey, well I am glad we have one thing in common;dogs. I lost my 9 year old dog Boddhi 15 months ago, and it broke my heart. Even though in comparison Squeak and Box are untrained monsters Box is a very special being.
Are you aware that normally people who work here put their information on their user page, and keep the User talk page for discussion.
I have prejudices, as we all do, but I do not bring them into my work at wikipedia. I would urge you to read this about writing with a neutral viewpoint. Wikipedia is not a forum for people to express their opinions. It is an encyclopedia and therefore must remain impartial. Your changes to the Javier Solana article were obviously not coming from a neutral point of view, and have been reverted. Nobody cares re this article whether or not Solana is the Beast. It is a serious political article. If you want to document this 666 material you must do so at Number of the Beast (numerology) where they are interested in anything relating to the Beast and 666. Thanks for praying for me. Make sure it is a nice prayer. --SqueakBox 15:43, Mar 3, 2005 (UTC)
I have now put the document which I deleted, you reinserted and I redeleted from the Solana article into the Beast article. I have moved your bit about yourself to your User page User:Cumbey but if you don't want it there feel free to move it back here, or ask me to do so at User talk:SqueakBox. --SqueakBox 21:31, Mar 3, 2005 (UTC)
Well, Squeabox, I read your 'rantings'/writings on end time theories with great interest. If you think those are funny, check out Findhorn, Plant Devas, Luciferic Initiations, Antahkaranas", Rainbow Bridges, etc., Doctrine of Avatars, and the whole plenitude of so publicly expressed New Age beliefs. Makes orthodox Christian doctrine look pretty tame, doesn't it, Squeakbox? Unfortunately, I don't have all day to sit at a computer and edit. I have to practice law for a living.
Constance E. Cumbey
cumbey@gmail.com
Javier Solana
Cumbey, well I am glad we have one thing in common;dogs. I lost my 9 year old dog Boddhi 15 months ago, and it broke my heart. Even though in comparison Squeak and Box are untrained monsters Box is a very special being.
Are you aware that normally people who work here put their information on their user page, and keep the User talk page for discussion.
I have prejudices, as we all do, but I do not bring them into my work at wikipedia. I would urge you to read this about writing with a neutral viewpoint. Wikipedia is not a forum for people to express their opinions. It is an encyclopedia and therefore must remain impartial. Your changes to the Javier Solana article were obviously not coming from a neutral point of view, and have been reverted. Nobody cares re this article whether or not Solana is the Beast. It is a serious political article. If you want to document this 666 material you must do so at Number of the Beast (numerology) where they are interested in anything relating to the Beast and 666. Thanks for praying for me. Make sure it is a nice prayer. --SqueakBox 15:43, Mar 3, 2005 (UTC)