User talk:Cyrius/Archive/2007/2/: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 18:41, 14 September 2007

Archives:

Photon belt

I undid your revisions on this article. As far fetched as this claim is, it's still the claim that is proclaimed by some of the proponents of the photon belt belief. Taemyr 20:37, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Even USGS messed up

Understood, I was just following USGS initial reports, reporting a 7.7 and 7.5. T Rex | talk 02:12, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't help that its breaking news on a few channels either. T Rex | talk 02:14, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sparrowman980

He seems to be trying to follow the Please be a giant dick, so we can ban you non-policy. -- Cyrius|✎ 12:42, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah. He started off on Wikipedia with persistent copyright violations, moved on to incivility, then engaged in a bit of revert warring and templating the regulars. Now he's moved on to further edit warring and unleashed a few personal attacks. But I'm a nice guy. :) -- RG² 16:38, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Post-WWII Soviet occupation of Eastern Europe

It's enough to protect the page from moves, I agree. And honestly I don't think we even need a move protection; it is evident the only disputed move is the one done by Ghirlandajo - all others were a response to his controversial and undiscussed action (WP:POINT, anyone?).--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk} 21:14, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. Should we leave some message for him about this not being the most constructive editing action?--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk} 21:20, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your conduct is unseemly, indecent and disgusting

Well you said here that responding to the questions about your throwing shit on contributors behind their backs is "not in your interest" as you "have been advised". Nice "advisers" you've got over there.

Pity, no one advised you that the very behavior that prompted those questions was reprehensible. Having no guts to tell the editor in his face you take it to IRC and spread the horrific insults about people behind their backs thinking that their not seeing it is a convenience to display your demeanor without consequences. That may very much be so and confirms what I said earlier on about the IRC culture and the damage it produces for the Wikipedia. But still, I could not help but to say in your face that your conduct is disgusting. You may delete this comment for what I care as you did the last one. --Irpen 18:41, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 25: / Line 25: @@
 It's enough to protect the page from moves, I agree. And honestly I don't think we even need a move protection; it is evident the only disputed move is the one done by Ghirlandajo - all others were a response to his controversial and undiscussed action ([[WP:POINT]], anyone?).--<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|&nbsp;Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&nbsp;]]|[[User_talk:Piotrus|<font style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;">&nbsp;talk&nbsp;</font>]]</span></sub> 21:14, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
 :Indeed. Should we leave some message for him about this not being the most constructive editing action?--<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|&nbsp;Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&nbsp;]]|[[User_talk:Piotrus|<font style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;">&nbsp;talk&nbsp;</font>]]</span></sub> 21:20, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
+==Your conduct is unseemly, indecent and disgusting==
+Well you said [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ACyrius&diff=157894912&oldid=157877490 here] that responding to the questions about your throwing shit on contributors behind their backs is "not in your interest" as you "have been advised". Nice "advisers" you've got over there.
+Pity, no one advised you that the very behavior that prompted those questions was reprehensible. Having no guts to tell the editor in his face you take it to IRC and spread the horrific insults about people behind their backs thinking that their not seeing it is a convenience to display your demeanor without consequences. That may very much be so and confirms what I said earlier on about the IRC culture and the damage it produces for the Wikipedia. But still, I could not help but to say in your face that your conduct is disgusting. You may delete this comment for what I care as you did the last one. --[[User:Irpen|Irpen]] 18:41, 14 September 2007 (UTC)