Jump to content

User talk:Docu: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Docu (talk | contribs)
move old talk to page history (see history for prev. discussion)
→‎So.: new section
Line 8: Line 8:
*For bot related questions, see [[User talk:D6]].
*For bot related questions, see [[User talk:D6]].
----
----

== So. ==

Given the amount of charm, tact and diplomacy that Andy used, I can't imagine why you decided not to amend your signature.

However, there were several others on the [[WT:SIG]] page who expressed reasons why your sig is a bit off, and I'd like you to reconsider, please. No timestamp breaks archive bots, and no link makes it harder for newbies to talk to you. This would be no big deal in an ordinary editor, but you are an admin and there is a good chance that someone you have interacted with, but who is inexperienced, will have trouble finding you. So, how about doing the decent thing? I think you've made your point and had your fun, so please do reconsider now. <b>[[User Talk:JzG|Guy]]</b> <small>([[User:JzG/help|Help!]])</small> 15:44, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:44, 27 September 2008

Royal angelfish
Photograph credit: Diego Delso
Hello there, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you ever need editing help visit Wikipedia:How does one edit a page and experiment at Wikipedia:Sandbox. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Wikipedia:Naming conventions or how to format them visit our manual of style. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Wikipedia:Help or add a question to the Village pump. Cheers! --maveric149

  • For more talk, see "Page history".
  • For bot related questions, see User talk:D6.

So.

Given the amount of charm, tact and diplomacy that Andy used, I can't imagine why you decided not to amend your signature.

However, there were several others on the WT:SIG page who expressed reasons why your sig is a bit off, and I'd like you to reconsider, please. No timestamp breaks archive bots, and no link makes it harder for newbies to talk to you. This would be no big deal in an ordinary editor, but you are an admin and there is a good chance that someone you have interacted with, but who is inexperienced, will have trouble finding you. So, how about doing the decent thing? I think you've made your point and had your fun, so please do reconsider now. Guy (Help!) 15:44, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]