User talk:Docu: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 17:35, 27 September 2008

Picture of the day

Greenbottle blue tarantula

Photograph credit: Didier Descouens

Hello there, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you ever need editing help visit Wikipedia:How does one edit a page and experiment at Wikipedia:Sandbox. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Wikipedia:Naming conventions or how to format them visit our manual of style. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Wikipedia:Help or add a question to the Village pump. Cheers! --maveric149

For more talk, see "Page history".
For bot related questions, see User talk:D6.

So.

Given the amount of charm, tact and diplomacy that Andy used, I can't imagine why you decided not to amend your signature.

However, there were several others on the WT:SIG page who expressed reasons why your sig is a bit off, and I'd like you to reconsider, please. No timestamp breaks archive bots, and no link makes it harder for newbies to talk to you. This would be no big deal in an ordinary editor, but you are an admin and there is a good chance that someone you have interacted with, but who is inexperienced, will have trouble finding you. So, how about doing the decent thing? I think you've made your point and had your fun, so please do reconsider now. Guy (Help!) 15:44, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I concur with Guy's remarks (redolent with charm, tact and diplomacy). Occuli (talk) 17:35, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 15:44, 27 September 2008 edit JzG (talk \| contribs) Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 155,019 edits →So.: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 17:35, 27 September 2008 edit undo Oculi (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 248,148 edits →So.: So Next edit →
Line 14:		Line 14:

	However, there were several others on the [[WT:SIG]] page who expressed reasons why your sig is a bit off, and I'd like you to reconsider, please. No timestamp breaks archive bots, and no link makes it harder for newbies to talk to you. This would be no big deal in an ordinary editor, but you are an admin and there is a good chance that someone you have interacted with, but who is inexperienced, will have trouble finding you. So, how about doing the decent thing? I think you've made your point and had your fun, so please do reconsider now. <b>[[User Talk:JzG\|Guy]]</b> <small>([[User:JzG/help\|Help!]])</small> 15:44, 27 September 2008 (UTC)		However, there were several others on the [[WT:SIG]] page who expressed reasons why your sig is a bit off, and I'd like you to reconsider, please. No timestamp breaks archive bots, and no link makes it harder for newbies to talk to you. This would be no big deal in an ordinary editor, but you are an admin and there is a good chance that someone you have interacted with, but who is inexperienced, will have trouble finding you. So, how about doing the decent thing? I think you've made your point and had your fun, so please do reconsider now. <b>[[User Talk:JzG\|Guy]]</b> <small>([[User:JzG/help\|Help!]])</small> 15:44, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

			:I concur with Guy's remarks (redolent with charm, tact and diplomacy). [[User:Occuli\|Occuli]] ([[User talk:Occuli\|talk]]) 17:35, 27 September 2008 (UTC)